Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 09:18:44AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > > When the concurrency limit for "[addr]:port" permits, the queue
> > > manager would call smtp(8) again (with the original delivery request
> > > and the list of already used addresses, and smtp(8) would attem
> On Oct 2, 2017, at 7:13 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
>> An SMTP nexthop corresponds to an unknown
>> (to the queue manager) set of destination MX hosts. Lots of domains
>> have various google, outlook.com, ... MX hosts, but there's no way
>> to know this without doing the MX lookup first. How
Wietse Venema:
> Viktor Dukhovni:
> > On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 09:18:44AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >
> > > > When the concurrency limit for "[addr]:port" permits, the queue
> > > > manager would call smtp(8) again (with the original delivery request
> > > > and the list of already used address
On 10/1/2017 8:15 PM, MRob wrote:
Hello, short of Per-Recipient Data Responses (PRDR) becoming standard,
may I ask how administrators are faking it? I understand you can
temp-fail all but the first rcpt-to, but how to do this in Postfix?
Does it require a custom milter? Surely there must be a p
On 10/2/2017 10:04 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 10/1/2017 8:15 PM, MRob wrote:
>> Hello, short of Per-Recipient Data Responses (PRDR) becoming
>> standard, may I ask how administrators are faking it? I understand
>> you can temp-fail all but the first rcpt-to, but how to do this in
>> Postfix?
On 10/2/2017 11:14 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_recipient_limit
I don't think we are talking about the same thing. If I set this to 1,
I would expect a 5xx for an email with more than one recipient. Do you
know for sure?
Regards,
KAM
I installed Postifx on OpenLeap 42.3 openSuse.
Firstly, I had issue that domain with record was not found and I
defined in main.cf that
inet_protocols=ipv4
After that I tried to send mail but neither mail was received nor I I have
got in /var/spool/postofix/defer report that message is deferre
On 10/2/2017 10:17 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 10/2/2017 11:14 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
>> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_recipient_limit
> I don't think we are talking about the same thing. If I set this to
> 1, I would expect a 5xx for an email with more than one recipient.
> Do
On 10/2/2017 11:47 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
Yes, for sure. Extra recipients will get a 4xx response.
Note this may*severely* delay deliveries, depending on the sender's
retry policy. If a message arrives with 100 recipients, the sender
will need to retry 99 times, which will likely take a very lo
> On Oct 2, 2017, at 11:47 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
>
> Note this may *severely* delay deliveries, depending on the sender's
> retry policy. If a message arrives with 100 recipients, the sender
> will need to retry 99 times, which will likely take a very long time.
It violates SMTP standards. In
On 02 Oct 2017, at 09:29, Vedran Vucic wrote:
> I installed Postifx on OpenLeap 42.3 openSuse.
> Firstly, I had issue that domain with record was not found and I defined
> in main.cf that
> inet_protocols=ipv4
records are for IPv6
> After that I tried to send mail but neither mail was
It has now been confirmed by the mailman3 team that the map generation for
the regexp files in mailman is incomplete. They are working on a solution.
For those interested, see my post here:
https://gitlab.com/mailman/mailman/issues/401.
Hi,
Ready to pull my hair out herei have a server running 2.6 and everything
works fine.
Trying to build new server with postfix 2.10.1
I have my postconf -n and postfix logs of my test email. This data is from
the new 2.10.1 box.
Do you need anything else ?
Oct 2 14:23:43 mta5 postfix/sm
[Please use plain text next time. Thanks]
On 10/2/2017 1:31 PM, Fazzina, Angelo wrote:
>
> Oct 2 14:24:43 mta5 postfix/smtp[13114]: connect to
> uconn-mail-onmicrosoft-com.mail.protection.outlook.com[207.46.163.106]:25:
> Connection timed out
"connection timed out" almost always means some sort
On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 06:31:07PM +, Fazzina, Angelo wrote:
> smtpd[13106]: 6359630038E5: client=angelo.uits.uconn.edu[137.99.80.129]
> cleanup[13111]: 6359630038E5:
> message-id=<39f07e3f-c6fe-642b-26b3-8964efda4...@appmail.uconn.edu>
> qmgr[13103]: 6359630038E5: from=, size=648,
> nrcpt=1
Hello,
I have two questions regarding the “mynetworks_style” parameter in main.cf.
In man I see that the “subnet” option for “mynetworks_style” is listed as being
supported in Postfix < 3.0. Does this mean that post-Postfix 3.0 this option
is deprecated ?
I also note that the “subnet” option
Hi,
For this part :
“On Linux, this works correctly only with interfaces specified with the
ifconfig command”
I think they are saying you can find valid interface names using the ifconfig
command.
The new way in RHEL 7 is "ip addr" replaces "ifconfig".
This:
does that mean that network sett
Hi, sorry if I posted in non-plain text format, did not know that was an issue.
Will watch for it next time.
I have gone through 2 guys in security/networking department today and was able
to finally prove it was firewall and not my postfix config being "wrong".
I even turned off SELinux and ip
New server, new IP address, same domain name?
Could be that you're dealing with DNS transition delays. Check the TTLs on
your domain records!
Original message From: "Fazzina, Angelo"
Date: 10/2/17 1:24 PM (GMT-07:00) To:
njo...@megan.vbhcs.org, postfix-users@postfix.org Subj
> On Oct 2, 2017, at 4:17 PM, Fazzina, Angelo wrote:
>
> Hi,
> For this part :
>
> “On Linux, this works correctly only with interfaces specified with the
> ifconfig command”
>
> I think they are saying you can find valid interface names using the ifconfig
> command.
> The new way in RHEL 7
On 03/10/17 09:09, J Doe wrote:
> In man I see that the “subnet” option for “mynetworks_style” is
> listed as being supported in Postfix < 3.0. Does this mean that
> post-Postfix 3.0 this option is deprecated ?
The full line in the docs you're referencing is:
(default: Postfix >= 3.0: host, Postf
Hello I just finished setting up FreeIPA with Dovecot + Postfix + Saslauthd.
I can easily access to mails using imap via dovecot with gssapi
authentication and postfix also delivering mails very well. But I cannot
send email from postfix using gssapi authentication (plain and login
authentication w
> On Oct 2, 2017, at 7:27 PM, Peter wrote:
>
>> With ifconfig being deprecated on Linux, does that mean that network
>> settings specified with newer commands that replace ifconfig will not
>> work ?
>
> I'm not entirely sure, but I would venture to say that it means that
> ifconfig libraries a
23 matches
Mail list logo
