use outlook connect to postfix on ubuntu 16.04 will fail, it seemed tls
established, and can connect to imap success, but send test mail will fail,
if use roundcube without tls, can log imap and smtp, and send recevive mail
successfully,here is log:
Sep 10 18:40:01 xiedeacc postfix/smtpd[5536]: An
please, use a real MUA to send mail so it does not wrap lines pasted from
configuration and logs.
On 10.09.17 04:05, xiedeacc wrote:
Sep 10 18:40:01 xiedeacc postfix/smtpd[5536]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
unknown[122.226.185.66]: 554 5.7.1 : Client host
rejected: Access denied; from= to=
proto=
Alpine (formerly PINE) does all of this and a lot more:
https://www.washington.edu/alpine/
Thunderbird is also a good option if you want a GUI, but not so light on
memory.
You may want to check out Mulberry as well. It's quite old but was one
of the best IMAP clients of its time:
http://MulberryM
it's really a real mua, it's dovecot
--
Sent from: http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Postfix-Users-f2.html
xiedeacc skrev den 2017-09-10 16:44:
it's really a real mua, it's dovecot
no
Sent from: http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Postfix-Users-f2.html
this is a real mua
ironical ?
xiedeacc:
> Sep 10 18:40:01 ... 554 5.7.1 : Client host
> rejected: Access denied
This is blocked by a 'reject' action in smtpd_client_restrictions or
by a 'reject' result in a check_client_access lookup table.
Suggestion: simply your rules and add things until things break.
Then you know what
maybe I misunderstood what's MUA, I will try to change configurations
tommorow, for in a inet envirament, my postfix will send a wrong certs for
unkown reason ,this really bother me, not localhost, but inet, and in inet,
nginx will sent wrong certs too, I cannot find the reason
--
Sent from: htt
On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 04:05:02AM -0700, xiedeacc wrote:
> Sep 10 18:40:01 xiedeacc postfix/smtpd[5536]: Anonymous TLS connection
> established from unknown[122.226.185.66]: TLSv1 with cipher
> ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)
TLS encrypts the channel, but does not typically authenticate the
On 09 Sep 2017, at 21:31, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> "mime_forward = yes" is not a new Mutt feature, it has been around for at
> least a decade, however, it is likely still not the default, you have to
> turn it on.
After looking, even with that setting mutt still sends emails as inline instead
of
On 10 Sep 2017, at 15:52, @lbutlr wrote:
> But this has gone down the rabbit hole enough, I guess.
> On 10 Sep 2017, at 07:25, Alan Dobkin wrote:
>>
>> Alpine (formerly PINE) does all of this and a lot more:
>> https://www.washington.edu/alpine/
Sorry, fat fingers. I had completely forgotten a
I just upgraded my server from Debian old-stable (jessie) to stable
(stretch) - and with it came an update to Postfix 3.1.4.
(Quick note: I typically send from my workstation, 'shere-khan', by way
of an ssh tunnel. That domain name will pop up.)
Following the upgrade, I can't seem to process mai
On 09 Sep 2017, at 11:19, yodel...@yepmail.net wrote:
> I'm just wondering if there's any throttling or something else to here?
This is only a "problem" because you are looking at it.
Yes, there are lots of log lines, but all they show is that this person is
being kept out of your mail server ne
On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 03:52:14PM -0600, @lbutlr wrote:
> On 09 Sep 2017, at 21:31, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> > "mime_forward = yes" is not a new Mutt feature, it has been around for at
> > least a decade, however, it is likely still not the default, you have to
> > turn it on.
>
> After looking
On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 03:01:54PM -0700, Dennis Carr wrote:
> postfix/local[2049]: warning: cannot find alias database owner for
> hash:/var/lib/mailman/data/aliases(0,lock|no_regsub|no_proxy|no_unauth|
> fold_fix|utf8_request): No such file or directory
The database file "hash:/var/lib/mailman
Dennis Carr:
> Sep 10 14:55:41 bast
> postfix/local[2049]: warning: cannot find alias database owner for
> hash:/var/lib/mailman/data/aliases(0,lock|no_regsub|no_proxy|no_unauth|
> fold_fix|utf8_request): No such file or directory
Postfix was unable to look up the password file entry for the user
On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 06:27:19PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > hash:/var/lib/mailman/data/aliases(0,lock|no_regsub|no_proxy|no_unauth|
> > fold_fix|utf8_request): No such file or directory
>
> Postfix was unable to look up the password file entry for the user
> that owns the file /var/lib/ma
On 10 Sep 2017, at 16:11, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> MUAs should be able to allow users to save "inline" attachments,
MUAs *should* do many things they do not do. Especially the more popular ones,
which seem to have the least features.
--
Apple broke AppleScripting signatures in Mail.app, so no
Wietse Venema wrote
> Dennis Carr:
>> Sep 10 14:55:41 bast
>> postfix/local[2049]: warning: cannot find alias database owner for
>> hash:/var/lib/mailman/data/aliases(0,lock|no_regsub|no_proxy|no_unauth|
>> fold_fix|utf8_request): No such file or directory
>
> Postfix was unable to look up the pa
dennisthetiger wrote
> Solved it by using master.cf.proto as master.cf; it seemed to be trying to
> use a chroot environment that wasn't properly configured. Now I have a
> general server configuration issue throwing SMTP 451 4.3.5 for any mail
> coming in from outside or through my ssh tunnel on
On Sep 10, 2017, at 6:25 PM, dennisthetiger
wrote:
> Victor, Wietse, if I ever see you in real life, I should buy you a
> $beverage. =D Thanks, gentlemen.
I probably owe each of them a case or two.
--
Apple broke AppleScripting signatures in Mail.app, so no random signatures.
> On Sep 10, 2017, at 8:01 PM, @lbutlr wrote:
>
>> MUAs should be able to allow users to save "inline" attachments,
>
> MUAs *should* do many things they do not do. Especially the more popular
> ones, which seem to have the least features.
http://blog.lance.tw/posts/2013/08/24/attach-mails-as
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 04:16:04AM CEST, "@lbutlr" said:
> On Sep 10, 2017, at 6:25 PM, dennisthetiger
> wrote:
> > Victor, Wietse, if I ever see you in real life, I should buy you a
> > $beverage. =D Thanks, gentlemen.
>
> I probably owe each of them a case or two.
>
I think it would be bad
22 matches
Mail list logo
