On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 06:29:40PM -0600, @lbutlr wrote:
> Figured someone on the list would have an opinion on a very
> lightweight feature-poor IMAP client. It doesn't need to do
> much else but access a single IMAP account and be able to
> forward emails as attachments. Search would be good, bu
Every few hours I get bursts of these from random addresses -- always at
"poneytelecom.eu" (online.net)
Communicating with abuse@ online.net/poneytelecom.eu is a lost cause. They're
completely useless.
Is postscreen doing its "best" job here at reducing load? It's clearly not
passing the att
yodel...@yepmail.net:
> Every few hours I get bursts of these from random addresses -- always at
> "poneytelecom.eu" (online.net)
>
> Communicating with abuse@ online.net/poneytelecom.eu is a lost cause.
> They're completely useless.
>
> Is postscreen doing its "best" job here at reducing load
On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 11:28:02AM -0500, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> > Primary considerations are fast and as light on memory use
> > as possible and usable from a Mac (command-line is fine). I
> > know mutt can do IMAP but I don't think it can forward
> > messages as attachments though I am probably wron
On 09 Sep 2017, at 10:28, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 06:29:40PM -0600, @lbutlr wrote:
>> Figured someone on the list would have an opinion on a very
>> lightweight feature-poor IMAP client. It doesn't need to do
>> much else but access a single IMAP account and be able to
>> forwa
> On Sep 9, 2017, at 9:12 PM, @lbutlr wrote:
>
> I'll double check this, but as I recall when i tried to do this in mutt last
> it would only forward the body of the email and if I wanted to include all of
> the attachments (including HTML parts) I had to select them, and then the
> message r
