On 17.08.17 14:22, Søren Peter Skou wrote:
>I have Local users and users with forwards.
how do they forward?
Using virtual_alias_maps - Lookup into a database, that returns the field
alias as destination (alias due to a backend expecting that particular
fieldname). If there is more than one for
Realized that my usage of "local" for my users, is wrong terminology, they are
all virtual users.
[...]
> You haven't posted whole master nor whole xMTPDeliver (pastebin, please).
> Both can contain something that causes multiple deliveries.
Pastebin coming up 😊
main.cf : https://pastebin.com/rQ
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 14:08 Tom Browder wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 1:13 PM, Tom Browder
> wrote:
> > In another thread we discussed having TLS but no SASL.
> >
> > I have tried the latest experimental Postfix and have dropped back to
> > using v3.2.2.
>
> Please disregard, this "problem"
Hi,
Slight repost from earlier, with answered questions removed. I still had these
open, if anyone can shed any light that would be great.
I have setup postfix recently on my AWS instance and things work pretty well. I
can read (dovecot) and sent (postfix) and all works well. I experienced some
We solved this problem by enabling postscreen on port 26, and forwarding port
25 on the ELB to port 26 on the instance, with Proxy Protocol enabled.
This allows our local clients to connect as normal via port 25 direct to the
instance, and remote incoming mail to be processed by postscreen.
In spite of its old age, I use the "Postfix" book by Kyle Dent for ease of
basic reference. I am now stepping through configuration and I can't find
whether the postfix commands should be executed as root or the postfix user.
I think it should be as root, but would appreciate an expert opinion.
T
On 18/08/17 22:57, Tom Browder wrote:
> In spite of its old age, I use the "Postfix" book by Kyle Dent for ease
> of basic reference. I am now stepping through configuration and I can't
> find whether the postfix commands should be executed as root or the
> postfix user.
>
> I think it should be a
Tom Browder skrev den 2017-08-18 12:57:
I think it should be as root, but would appreciate an expert opinion.
if its not root, it would be a fail on its own
Thanks.
+1
On 18.08.2017 12:57, Tom Browder wrote:
> I can't find whether the postfix commands should be executed as root
> or the postfix user.
"The postfix commands" is ambiguous. While launching Postfix needs to
be done as root, other functions can be performed by other users. For
example, authorized_flu
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 06:41 Ralph Seichter
wrote:
> On 18.08.2017 12:57, Tom Browder wrote:
>
> > I can't find whether the postfix commands should be executed as root
> > or the postfix user.
>
> "The postfix commands" is ambiguous. While launching Postfix needs to
> be done as root, other func
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 10:57:35AM +, Tom Browder wrote:
> In spite of its old age, I use the "Postfix" book by Kyle Dent for ease of
> basic reference. I am now stepping through configuration and I can't find
> whether the postfix commands should be executed as root or the postfix user.
>
>
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 8:24 AM, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
...
> The "postfix" user is an unprivileged service account (think of it
> as a Postfix-specific "nobody" account) used to run internal services
> at low-privilege (optionally chrooted with root permissions revoked).
> While it is possible to
I'm reading about some conflicting opinions of the spf record (via a
TXT record) and wonder if there is a consensus view among the postfix
developers.
Thanks.
-Tom
What's the conflicting opinion ?
Sent from my iPhone
> On 18 Aug 2017, at 16:25, Tom Browder wrote:
>
> I'm reading about some conflicting opinions of the spf record (via a
> TXT record) and wonder if there is a consensus view among the postfix
> developers.
>
> Thanks.
>
> -Tom
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Alef Veld wrote:
> What's the conflicting opinion ?
Looking at a Wikipedia article:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sender_Policy_Framework
But i guess spf is here to stay.
Thanks.
-Tom
On 08/18/17 11:33, Tom Browder wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Alef Veld wrote:
>> What's the conflicting opinion ?
>
> Looking at a Wikipedia article:
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sender_Policy_Framework
I fail to see anything in that article that would reach the level of a
Hi,
I was unaware of the controversy. I can tell you that for the specific example
given :
(For example, a person who uses their home ISP's SMTP servers to send mail with
their work email as the address.)
I was for years tagging and delivering on SPF failures with my appliances. Just
recently
17 matches
Mail list logo
