:-)
>> I'm reading http://www.postfix.org/MILTER_README.html and I'm still not
>> quite sure. Both are performed by cleanup. What determines the order:
>> which goes first and which goes then? I can't find any variable
>> determining this... :-( Is it pre-defined (what order?). Can I force
>> chan
> > Canonical maps replace headers or envelopes before the entire message
> > is received. Milters replace/add/delete envelope or content after
> > the entire message is received.
>
> I'm not quite sure if I understand the term you use: `before/after the
> entire message is received'. I'd really
On 06/03/2017 02:13 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>> Canonical maps replace headers or envelopes before the entire message
>>> is received. Milters replace/add/delete envelope or content after
>>> the entire message is received.
>>
>> I'm not quite sure if I understand the term you use: `before/after
Marek Kozlowski:
[ Charset ISO-8859-2 converted... ]
> On 06/03/2017 02:13 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >>> Canonical maps replace headers or envelopes before the entire message
> >>> is received. Milters replace/add/delete envelope or content after
> >>> the entire message is received.
> >>
> >> I'
On 3 June 2017 at 14:01, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Marek Kozlowski:
> [ Charset ISO-8859-2 converted... ]
> > On 06/03/2017 02:13 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > >>> Canonical maps replace headers or envelopes before the entire message
> > >>> is received. Milters replace/add/delete envelope or conten
Dominic Raferd:
> On 3 June 2017 at 14:01, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > Marek Kozlowski:
> > [ Charset ISO-8859-2 converted... ]
> > > On 06/03/2017 02:13 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > >>> Canonical maps replace headers or envelopes before the entire message
> > > >>> is received. Milters replace
I'm setting up a new server with the goal of using letsencrypt versus my self
signed cert. (I'm also going to try those SpamAssassin alternatives that
require less RAM.) So I will run two VPS for a period as I debug the new server.
That said, is there any way to implement email going to both ex
Hello,
We have a few forwarders where we need to change the "mail from" during the
SMTP stage. Nothing else has to change and I know that spam would be seen as
coming from our mail server if we forward it. This last part is acceptable
for us. On the mail server that we want to retire this is done
:-)
On 06/04/2017 07:58 AM, Mark Scholten wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We have a few forwarders where we need to change the "mail from" during the
> SMTP stage. Nothing else has to change and I know that spam would be seen as
> coming from our mail server if we forward it. This last part is acceptable
> f
> -Original Message-
> From: Marek Kozlowski [mailto:m.kozlow...@mini.pw.edu.pl]
> Sent: Sunday, June 4, 2017 8:04
> To: Mark Scholten; postfix-users@postfix.org
> Subject: Re: Changing "mail from"
>
> :-)
>
> On 06/04/2017 07:58 AM, Mark Scholten wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > We have a few
On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 08:04:14AM +0200, Marek Kozlowski wrote:
> On 06/04/2017 07:58 AM, Mark Scholten wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> We have a few forwarders where we need to change the "mail from"
>> during the SMTP stage. Nothing else has to change and I know that
>> spam would be seen as coming from
11 matches
Mail list logo
