On Wed, 10 May 2017 19:26:48 -0400 (EDT) Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Normally I would avoid a catch-all for the obvious reasons, but
> > we're undertaking a migration, and for a short period we want to
> > have the Postfix server relay to another MX server any messages
> > that it has no specific acti
Thanks so much for the information! Also, tempfail does work correctly. But
couple of questions though,
1. When default action is tempfail and the milter is unavailable, smtpd
sends 451 (Requested action aborted: error in processing). Wonder if there
is a way to send 421 (Service not available, cl
> On May 11, 2017, at 12:16 PM, Purushotham Nayak
> wrote:
>
> 2. I noticed that when the milter application exits, it sends FIN to smtpd
> but smtpd keeps the connection open in the CLOSE_WAIT state. When the client
> sends something new and smptd tries to send SMFIC_ABORT to the milter on t
> On May 11, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Andrew Beverley wrote:
>
> I've tried setting relay_domains and
> relay_recipient_maps accordingly, but what I failed to mention in my
> first email is that the domain in question is a virtual domain. As
> such, emails that I would like forwarded (in relay_domains
Combining milter restart with postfix reload sounds like a good suggestion.
Our milter restarts due on rare occasions due to upstream changes, but
combining it with postfix reload or postfix -> milter seems good solution.
Thanks very much for your input.
Thanks,
Purush
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 12:
Purushotham Nayak:
> Thanks so much for the information! Also, tempfail does work correctly. But
> couple of questions though,
>
> 1. When default action is tempfail and the milter is unavailable, smtpd
> sends 451 (Requested action aborted: error in processing). Wonder if there
> is a way to send
On Thu, 11 May 2017 12:30:11 -0400 Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
> > On May 11, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Andrew Beverley
> > wrote:
> >
> > I've tried setting relay_domains and
> > relay_recipient_maps accordingly, but what I failed to mention in my
> > first email is that the domain in question is a virtu