Hi Viktor,
I have changed my configuration with your recommendation, but the Exchange
server behind the gateway is still receiving mails for us...@example.com
instead of user1@internal1.example.
Postfix Log:
postfix/smtp[15949]: 08F37AE307: to=,
orig_to=, relay=10.0.0.8[10.0.0.8]:25, delay=0.4
I have two mail servers.
One is an older release of Postfix and I’m building a replacement for that
server.
I did a test where I sent the same message to both servers.
In /etc/var/maillog on the one server, when the incoming message is being
delivered, I see the hostname connect.
On the new
On 04/25/2017 01:19 PM, robert.wo...@robertwolfe.org wrote:
> On 2017-04-25 01:54, martijn.list wrote:
>
>> I need to configure a smart host for Exchange Online (Office 365), i.e.,
>> all email sent with Exchange Online should be relayed through an
>> external Postfix server (smarthost). O365 allo
On 4/25/2017 7:36 AM, Michael Segel wrote:
> I have two mail servers.
> One is an older release of Postfix and I’m building a replacement for that
> server.
>
> I did a test where I sent the same message to both servers.
>
> In /etc/var/maillog on the one server, when the incoming message is
Hi
I have configured one line in postfix main.cf (after configure each line I
check /var/log/mail.err):
smtpd_tls_dh1024_param_file = /etc/postfix/dh2048.pem
After setup above line I have error in above log file (these 4 lines
looped):
Apr 25 14:08:09 serwer-1 dovecot: imap-login: Error: SSL: Stac
Hi, I have the transport_maps with hash to specify where serve messages will be
redirect.
Can I save in header a result of the query in transport_maps each mail ?
Example:
1) A client mail sent a mail(thunderbird)
2) My postfix will autentic with Active Directory
3) After mail go to a transport
> On Apr 25, 2017, at 10:49 AM, Luis Miguel Flores dos Santos
> wrote:
>
> Hi, I have the transport_maps with hash to specify where serve messages will
> be redirect.
> Can I save in header a result of the query in transport_maps each mail ?
No. The Postfix queue file is becomes effectively
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 07:26:38AM +, Dennis Weber wrote:
> I have changed my configuration with your recommendation, but the Exchange
> server behind the gateway is still receiving mails for us...@example.com
> instead of user1@internal1.example.
Please post your configuration as explained i
FSCK ME!
Yeah, that solved the issue.
So… why would that cause the issue?
Normally I’d leave this to the experts while I focus on my day job, but since
this is my SOHO domain, I have to ask these questions which of course 3 months
from now, I’ll forget and have to do it all over again.
Do I wa
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 04:06:04PM +, Michael Segel wrote:
> Normally I�d leave this to the experts while I focus on my day job, but
> since this is my SOHO domain, I have to ask these questions which of course
> 3 months from now, I�ll forget and have to do it all over again.
> Do I want to e
Thanks a lot Viktor!
I wanted to make this to segment the wich server the message will be delivered
because I have the problem:
Today I have 10 mail server and I have created a proxy for the domain to
coexist between them. And create a postfix to clients connect and send message
(Previous mail
Victor can I use "Postfix After-Queue Content Filter" to insert new header
based in a query ?
De: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org em nome
de Luis Miguel Flores dos Santos
Enviado: terça-feira, 25 de abril de 2017 13:33:39
Para: Postfix users
Assunto: Re: Write
> On Apr 25, 2017, at 1:35 PM, Luis Miguel Flores dos Santos
> wrote:
>
> Victor can I use "Postfix After-Queue Content Filter" to insert new header
> based in a query ?
Wrong question. You should not have to do this at all. Why do you have
a proxy that cannot do mail routing between Postf
> On Apr 25, 2017, at 10:15 AM, Poliman - Serwis wrote:
>
> I have configured one line in postfix main.cf (after configure each line
> I check /var/log/mail.err):
For *Postfix* errors.
> smtpd_tls_dh1024_param_file = /etc/postfix/dh2048.pem
This is a reasonable Postfix setting, presumably you
Sorry my English is very poor.
I'll try describe it better now:
I have 10 mail server and 9 are smartermail an 1 exchange, and same domains can
exist in each one but don't mail account. An example I have a domain
EXAMPLE.COM created in two plataforms:
migue...@example.com --> smartermail01.dom
I’m setting up my first mail server.
I’ve installed Postfix, configured a few options, and can send mail
successfully. I have two addresses, one IPv4 and one IPv6, and I’ve set up
my SPF record to my IPv4, which is the one I’d like to use to send emails.
The problem is that Postfix refuses to send
On 25 April 2017 at 21:19, Tumbleweed wrote:
> I’m setting up my first mail server.
>
> I’ve installed Postfix, configured a few options, and can send mail
> successfully. I have two addresses, one IPv4 and one IPv6, and I’ve set up
> my SPF record to my IPv4, which is the one I’d like to use to
Wow, that was easy.
But… why does inet_protocols work when inet_interfaces fails?
Anyway, thanks!
> On Apr 25, 2017, at 16:44, Dominic Raferd [via Postfix]
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 25 April 2017 at 21:19, Tumbleweed <[hidden email]
> > wrote:
> I’m setting up my first mail server.
>
> I’ve ins
How likely is it for a DNS to have SRV records for such things as smtp.
imap ...
I know that a dumb ? but I am try to guesstimate how big an dewy eyed
optomist I am being in hoping that they are common practise.
>
>> On Apr 6, 2017, at 5:02 PM, G. Schlisio wrote:
>>
>> I wonder if it is possible to have one cert per port postfix is serving
>> on, eg one for 25 and one for 587.
>
> Yes.
>
>master.cf:
> submission inet ... smtpd
>-o smtpd_tls_cert_file=$mua_tls_cert_file
>-o smtp
> On Apr 25, 2017, at 4:59 PM, G. Schlisio wrote:
>
>> It is also possible to avoid DANE TLSA changes while rolling over
>> Let's Encrypt keys:
>>
>>
>> http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/WoSign-StartCom-CA-in-the-news-td86436.html#a86444
>> https://community.letsencrypt.org/t/new-certbo
On 4/25/2017 4:57 PM, John wrote:
How likely is it for a DNS to have SRV records for such things as
smtp. imap ...
I know that a dumb ? but I am try to guesstimate how big an dewy eyed
optomist I am being in hoping that they are common practise.
In my experience, very rare, not even sure what I
>> Thank you for your hints and sorry for the late followup. busy and stuff.
>> thank you for your suggestions, I was aware of the csr-option but wanted
>> to avoid this, since it does not well automate with certbot.
>
> Sine "--csr" is a certbot option I am surprised to hear you say that
> "it do
Hi Viktor,
thank you a lot for your time and effort!
I have now activated the verbose option on my smtp and trivial-rewrite and was
analyzing the connection log.
Maillog of outgoing mail through the gateway:
http://webertec.net/fileshare/maillog_incoming.txt
Maillog of incoming mail through th
> On Apr 25, 2017, at 5:31 PM, Dennis Weber wrote:
>
> Hi Viktor,
>
> thank you a lot for your time and effort!
>
> I have now activated the verbose option on my smtp and trivial-rewrite and
> was analyzing the connection log.
You made the incoming stmpd(8) verbose, but all the interesting s
b...@bitrate.net:
> is there a way to add a postscreen score/summary header to accepted
> messages? the logs are great, but this could be helpful in reviewing
> messages and making improvements to the configuration.
I think it would be wrong to add headers that report results for
tests that weren
John:
> How likely is it for a DNS to have SRV records for such things as smtp.
> imap ...
> I know that a dumb ? but I am try to guesstimate how big an dewy eyed
> optomist I am being in hoping that they are common practise.
The SMTP standard RFC 5322 require MX and A lookups but no SRV lookups
> On Apr 25, 2017, at 8:08 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> The SMTP standard RFC 5322 require MX and A lookups but no SRV lookups.
There is an SRV specification for MUAs in https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6186
The security picture for this is rather dire at present, and is largely
unsupported by M
On 04/25/2017 11:10 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 4/25/2017 4:57 PM, John wrote:
How likely is it for a DNS to have SRV records for such things as
smtp. imap ...
I know that a dumb ? but I am try to guesstimate how big an dewy eyed
optomist I am being in hoping that they are common practise.
Yes I have freshly generated dh2048.pem. It's new server and I try to
secure him. Should this line be uncommented? (I commented it out because of
above errors) I wrote these errors here, becouse they are related to this
one line from postfix.
2017-04-25 20:09 GMT+02:00 Viktor Dukhovni :
>
> > On
30 matches
Mail list logo
