On Wed, March 1, 2017 11:13 am, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> That resolver is having problems that I don't see:
>
>
> $ dig +nocd -t mx surfacetreatment.be
> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 23879
> ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 4, ADDITIONAL: 2
> ;surfacetreat
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 09:50:55PM +1100, Voytek wrote:
> BUT, I'm not getting BOTH MX and NS, like in your dig, though, get them
> individually with 't' option
Name servers may include or not, according to various local policy
settings, the Authority section appropriate to an answer. When you
us
Recently configured postfix to use the dovecot lda as I wanted to use
sieve. Got that working a few days ago but noticed that I wasn't getting
any emails to aliases. Checked the logs and saw messages like:
Mar 1 08:19:59 carson postfix/lmtp[16949]: 0DCD22016BE: to=<
sa...@example.com>, relay=cars
Good day everyone. I have a quick question about a milter that I'm using.
I'm running Postfix 3.x. The milter is called SNFMilter and it uses a Unix
socket instead of inet. My question is a general question about milters. Is
there a way to bypass a milter for authenticated senders who are sending o
* Linda Pagillo :
> Good day everyone. I have a quick question about a milter that I'm using.
> I'm running Postfix 3.x. The milter is called SNFMilter and it uses a Unix
> socket instead of inet. My question is a general question about milters. Is
> there a way to bypass a milter for authenticated
:-)
I'm searching for a Sender Rewriting Scheme tool well integrated with
postfix. postsrsd seems nice and generally works nice however it causes
some problems if canonicals for all four addresses are used - it
operates on the same `sender_canonical_classes' and
`recipient_canonical_classes' setti
I have only one smtpd_milter and no non_smtpd_milters. The one milter I'm
using is called SNFMilter. It's an anti-spam milter that I use from Arm
Research. I have a configuration file called SNFMilter.xml and in the
main.cf I have the following line: smtpd_milters = unix:/path/to/socket
Forgive me
* Linda Pagillo :
> I have only one smtpd_milter and no non_smtpd_milters. The one milter I'm
> using is called SNFMilter. It's an anti-spam milter that I use from Arm
> Research. I have a configuration file called SNFMilter.xml and in the
> main.cf I have the following line: smtpd_milters = unix:/
Thank you for this Patrick. My problem is, I want to disable the milter for
outgoing authenticated email on those ports, not enable the milter for
them. Also.. I want the milter to still run on non-authenticated email. For
example... u...@domain.com is a valid user on the server. They want to send
* Linda Pagillo :
> Thank you for this Patrick. My problem is, I want to disable the milter for
> outgoing authenticated email on those ports, not enable the milter for
> them. Also.. I want the milter to still run on non-authenticated email. For
> example... u...@domain.com is a valid user on the
Thank you so much Patrick. I sincerely appreciate your help with this.
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
> * Linda Pagillo :
> > Thank you for this Patrick. My problem is, I want to disable the milter
> for
> > outgoing authenticated email on those ports, not enable the
> On Mar 1, 2017, at 8:42 AM, Ian Evans wrote:
>
> Mar 1 08:19:59 carson postfix/lmtp[16949]: 0DCD22016BE:
> to=, relay=carson.example.com[private/dovecot-lmtp],
> delay=0.07, delays=0.01/0.01/0/0.04, dsn=5.1.1, status=bounced (host
> carson.example.com[private/dovecot-lmtp] said: 550 5.1.1
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 2:47 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
>
> > On Mar 1, 2017, at 8:42 AM, Ian Evans wrote:
> >
> > Mar 1 08:19:59 carson postfix/lmtp[16949]: 0DCD22016BE: to=<
> sa...@example.com>, relay=carson.example.com[private/dovecot-lmtp],
> delay=0.07, delays=0.01/0.01/0/0.04, dsn=5.1.1,
:-)
Not a postfix issue in fact... Forgive me, please!
I've found something like this: http://www.onyxbits.de/gnarwl/ So old so
abandoned, there is surely no forum/list/support/help on it. Is there -
by accident - anyone who used it and have integrated it with postfix?
Thanks in advance!
Best re
> On Mar 1, 2017, at 3:20 PM, Ian Evans wrote:
>
> virtual_mailbox_base = /home/vmail
> virtual_mailbox_domains = example.com
> virtual_mailbox_limit = 0
> virtual_mailbox_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/vmaps
> virtual_transport = lmtp:unix:private/dovecot-lmtp
The virtual_mailbox_maps table is NOT a
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
>
> > On Mar 1, 2017, at 3:20 PM, Ian Evans wrote:
> >
> > virtual_mailbox_base = /home/vmail
> > virtual_mailbox_domains = example.com
> > virtual_mailbox_limit = 0
> > virtual_mailbox_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/vmaps
> > virtual_transport =
Hello,
I'm wanting to insert an email signature in all outgoing email
messages. Is altermime still the best way of doing this or is there
another path?
Thanks.
Dave.
> On Mar 1, 2017, at 4:14 PM, Ian Evans wrote:
>
> Okay...lack of caffeine and hospital distraction is probably not the best
> time to be doing this,
>
> Created /etc/virtual with:
>
> example.com this-text-is-ignored
Lose the above line. The domain is not a virtual alias domain,
i
On Mar 1, 2017 4:30 PM, "Viktor Dukhovni"
wrote:
> On Mar 1, 2017, at 4:14 PM, Ian Evans wrote:
>
> Okay...lack of caffeine and hospital distraction is probably not the best
time to be doing this,
>
> Created /etc/virtual with:
>
> example.com this-text-is-ignored
Lose the above line.
I was prompted from reading a recent post to check whether my postscreen
set up was picking up Spamhaus responses. Quick grep through my logs
confirmed that it was not. Seems I am in a bit of Bind (sorry for the
pun). If I use Google's DNS I dont get a response from zen.spamhaus.org.
If I use m
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 10:00:28PM +, Robert Sharp wrote:
> I was prompted from reading a recent post to check whether my
> postscreen set up was picking up Spamhaus responses. Quick grep
> through my logs confirmed that it was not. Seems I am in a bit
> of Bind (sorry for the pun). If I use
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 05:49:35PM -0600, /dev/rob0 wrote in
haste, and now at leisure, corrects:
> I'm more familiar with BIND, and this will do it:
>
> # mv /etc/named.conf /etc/named.conf.distrib
# touch /etc/named.conf
> # echo "nameserver 127.0.0.1" > /etc/resolv.conf
> # named
A named.
On Wed, March 1, 2017 10:45 pm, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 09:50:55PM +1100, Voytek wrote:
Andrew,
> Why are you setting +nocd?
ahmm, I saw it in Viktor's post, and, copied it..oops
> It looks like you're still seeing a SERVFAIL for the MX record, at
> least in what you po
Hi everyone. In mail.log file I have many lines like below:
Mar 2 06:53:30 vps342401 postfix/smtps/smtpd[14642]: SSL_accept error from
house.census.shodan.io[89.248.172.16]: -1
Mar 2 06:53:30 vps342401 postfix/smtps/smtpd[14642]: warning: TLS library
problem: error:1408A10B:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_
* Poliman - Serwis :
> Hi everyone. In mail.log file I have many lines like below:
> Mar 2 06:53:30 vps342401 postfix/smtps/smtpd[14642]: SSL_accept error from
> house.census.shodan.io[89.248.172.16]: -1
> Mar 2 06:53:30 vps342401 postfix/smtps/smtpd[14642]: warning: TLS library
> problem: erro
25 matches
Mail list logo
