Sorry, I don't have time for this.
Wietse
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 02:00:14PM +, Dominic Raferd wrote:
> I am puzzling over why postfix fails to pass a response from gmail at
> the end of an outgoing transmission through to
> smtp_delivery_status_filter.
This is because, unlike the case with smtp_reply_filter, the
smtp_dsn_bounce_filt
Viktor Dukhovni:
> This is because, unlike the case with smtp_reply_filter, the
> smtp_dsn_bounce_filter applies only when a recipient is "done",
> that is, no further attempts to deliver the message to the recipient
> via a an alternate MX host or fallback will be attempted.
Thanks for spotting t
> On Jan 11, 2017, at 9:44 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> Thanks for spotting that. What about adding some text:
>
>Note: The smtp(8) and lmtp(8) delivery agents can make delivery
>attempts to multiple MX or A destinations. Unlike
>(smtp|lmtp)_reply_filter, the (smtp|lmtp)_delivery_st
On 11 January 2017 at 14:53, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
>> On Jan 11, 2017, at 9:44 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for spotting that. What about adding some text:
>>
>>Note: The smtp(8) and lmtp(8) delivery agents can make delivery
>>attempts to multiple MX or A destinations. Unlike
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 09:53:21AM -0500, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> > On Jan 11, 2017, at 9:44 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for spotting that. What about adding some text:
> >
> >Note: The smtp(8) and lmtp(8) delivery agents can make delivery
> >attempts to multiple MX or A de
On 11/01/17 15:44, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Thanks for spotting that. What about adding some text:
> Note: The smtp(8) and lmtp(8) delivery agents can make delivery
> attempts to multiple MX or A destinations. Unlike
> (smtp|lmtp)_reply_filter, the (smtp|lmtp)_delivery_status_filter
>
> On Jan 11, 2017, at 10:28 AM, Jan Ceuleers wrote:
>
> Should that be "final delivery attempt" instead of "last delivery
> attempt", to avoid any possible confusion caused by the fact that "last"
> could also mean "previous"?
All these terms are potentially confusing out of context. I think t
On 2017-01-10 (09:16 MST), Jan Ceuleers wrote:
>
> On 09/01/17 21:06, @lbutlr wrote:
>> 640K RAM ought to be enough for everybody.
>>> No even similar. The address space for 128bit is in the general
>>> neighborhood of the number of atoms in the universe.
>> Sorry, that's 256 bits. 128 bits is t
Excuse my ignorance, but isn't this whole discussion of "/128" based on
the assumption that this notation means a block of 2^128 addresses? And
isn't 2^128 the size of the entire IPv6 address space? There would be
nothing left over after designating a block of that size.
Doesn't "/128" mean
> Larry Kuenning kirjoitti 11.01.2017 kello 21:20:
>
> Excuse my ignorance, but isn't this whole discussion of "/128" based on the
> assumption that this notation means a block of 2^128 addresses? And isn't
> 2^128 the size of the entire IPv6 address space? There would be nothing left
> ove
Hi,
I plan on changing my postfix config from
smtpd_tls_exclude_ciphers = RC4, aNULL
smtpd_tls_mandatory_protocols = !SSLv3, !SSLv2
to
smtpd_tls_mandatory_protocols = !SSLv3, !SSLv2
smtpd_tls_exclude_ciphers = DES-CBC3-SHA, EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA, RC4, aNULL
I ran this
openssl ciphers -v ALL|grep
On 1/11/2017 3:27 PM, Fazzina, Angelo wrote:
> My questions:
>
> 1. can i turn up postfix debug level to see the actual cipher chosen
> when a mail server connects to my mail server ?
Yes, in main.cf set the smtpd_tls_loglevel and smtp_tls_loglevel to 1.
Higher levels of logging will flood you
Viktor Dukhovni:
>
> > On Jan 11, 2017, at 9:44 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for spotting that. What about adding some text:
> >
> >Note: The smtp(8) and lmtp(8) delivery agents can make delivery
> >attempts to multiple MX or A destinations. Unlike
> >(smtp|lmtp)_reply_fi
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 04:43:47PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Viktor Dukhovni:
> >
> > > On Jan 11, 2017, at 9:44 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks for spotting that. What about adding some text:
> > >
> > >Note: The smtp(8) and lmtp(8) delivery agents can make delivery
> > >
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 09:27:25PM +, Fazzina, Angelo wrote:
> I plan on changing my postfix config from
> smtpd_tls_exclude_ciphers = RC4, aNULL
> smtpd_tls_mandatory_protocols = !SSLv3, !SSLv2
>
> to
>
> smtpd_tls_mandatory_protocols = !SSLv3, !SSLv2
> smtpd_tls_exclude_ciphers = DES-CBC3-
*Really?* No one has dealt with this issue? Thats astonishing.
I would have expected this to have been done many times, to the point where
it might even get documented on the Postfix web site (but I can't find it if
it is).
I may have to abandon this project and look for some other tool, but I
On 1/11/2017 4:33 PM, jdehnert wrote:
> *Really?* No one has dealt with this issue? Thats astonishing.
No one knows what your issue is.
To report a problem with postfix, please see
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
In particular, be sure to include "postconf -n" output and unedited
Noel Jones-2 wrote
> On 1/11/2017 4:33 PM, jdehnert wrote:
>> *Really?* No one has dealt with this issue? Thats astonishing.
>
> No one knows what your issue is.
Hmm, I thought I was clear with my post, but I guess I was not clear enough.
I should have posted the postconf -n output, but I was
I can't speak for anyone else, but your original post doesn't seem to have made
it to the list.
The one that came in an hour ago to which Noel replied had no details, and it
had a "re:" in the subject line indicating it was part of a thread containing
other messages but none of the other messag
On 2017-01-11 (12:20 MST), Larry Kuenning wrote:
>
> Excuse my ignorance, but isn't this whole discussion of "/128" based on the
> assumption that this notation means a block of 2^128 addresses?
No, a /128 is a single IP out of the 2^128 block space. Just like a single IPv4
is a /32, while a “
Kevin Miller wrote
> I can't speak for anyone else, but your original post doesn't seem to have
> made it to the list.
>
> The one that came in an hour ago to which Noel replied had no details, and
> it had a "re:" in the subject line indicating it was part of a thread
> containing other messages
Does it have to be authenticated? Assuming that your users receive internet
mail on the office365 box, you could just set the postfix host to send on port
25. You can limit what it will relay to mail from your internal subnets so it
isn't an open relay and it can pass anything from your printe
Only problem I had with office 365 is old postfix version in CentOS 6
repos. After building newer version all worked as it should.
чт, 12 янв. 2017 г. в 2:43, jdehnert :
> Kevin Miller wrote
> > I can't speak for anyone else, but your original post doesn't seem to
> have
> > made it to the list.
Kevin Miller wrote
> Does it have to be authenticated? Assuming that your users receive
> internet mail on the office365 box, you could just set the postfix host to
> send on port 25. You can limit what it will relay to mail from your
> internal subnets so it isn't an open relay and it can pass a
Igor Golubkov wrote
> Only problem I had with office 365 is old postfix version in CentOS 6
> repos. After building newer version all worked as it should.
I'm running this in a Centos 7.2 system, but the Postfix version is a rather
old 2.10.1
Would moving up to Postfix 3.1 help?
I hate breaking
On 12/01/17 13:14, jdehnert wrote:
> I'm running this in a Centos 7.2 system, but the Postfix version is a rather
> old 2.10.1
>
> Would moving up to Postfix 3.1 help?
>
> I hate breaking the package manager by installing from source, but if 3.1
> can resolve my issues I will give it a try.
No n
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 03:33:40PM -0700, jdehnert wrote:
> *Really?* No one has dealt with this issue? Thats astonishing.
>
> I would have expected this to have been done many times, to the point where
> it might even get documented on the Postfix web site (but I can't find it if
> it is).
>
Hello,
TL;DR:
I need to setup different configuration for two different relays... and
I can't see if this is possible and how to do it.
I have a Postfix problem and very limited internet access (I've just
subscribed to the mailing list but I'm not sure if I'll be able to
download all the messag
I hV
On 12 January 2017 at 05:59, Carles Pina i Estany wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> TL;DR:
> I need to setup different configuration for two different relays... and
> I can't see if this is possible and how to do it.
>
>
> I have a Postfix problem and very limited internet access (I've just
> subscribed
30 matches
Mail list logo
