DNSBLOG and whitelisted domains

2017-01-09 Thread @lbutlr
Only hosts with scores that exceed the postscreen_dnsbl_threshold get logged with their scores, and not IPs that reach the postscreen_dnsbl_whitelist_threshold, is that correct? I certainly don’t see anything like a DNSBL rank for whitelisted domains. Am I missing it? -- Apple broke AppleScr

Re: DNSBLOG and whitelisted domains

2017-01-09 Thread Florian Piekert
Am 09.01.2017 um 13:14 schrieb @lbutlr: > Only hosts with scores that exceed the postscreen_dnsbl_threshold get logged > with their scores, and not IPs that reach the > postscreen_dnsbl_whitelist_threshold, is that correct? > > I certainly don’t see anything like a DNSBL rank for whitelisted dom

Re: DNSBLOG and whitelisted domains

2017-01-09 Thread @lbutlr
> On 09 Jan 2017, at 05:17, Florian Piekert wrote: > > Am 09.01.2017 um 13:14 schrieb @lbutlr: >> Only hosts with scores that exceed the postscreen_dnsbl_threshold get logged >> with their scores, and not IPs that reach the >> postscreen_dnsbl_whitelist_threshold, is that correct? >> >> I cer

Re: DNSBLOG and whitelisted domains

2017-01-09 Thread Wietse Venema
@lbutlr: > Only hosts with scores that exceed the postscreen_dnsbl_threshold get = > logged with their scores, and not IPs that reach the = > postscreen_dnsbl_whitelist_threshold, is that correct? > > I certainly don=E2=80=99t see anything like a DNSBL rank for whitelisted = > domains. Am I missin

Re: DNSBLOG and whitelisted domains

2017-01-09 Thread @lbutlr
On 09 Jan 2017, at 07:59, Wietse Venema wrote: > @lbutlr: >> Only hosts with scores that exceed the postscreen_dnsbl_threshold get = >> logged with their scores, and not IPs that reach the = >> postscreen_dnsbl_whitelist_threshold, is that correct? >> >> I certainly don=E2=80=99t see anything lik

Re: Avoiding spam blacklists

2017-01-09 Thread @lbutlr
On 29 Dec 2016, at 03:53, Peter wrote: > Linode assigns a single static IPv6 /128 That seems like incorrect behavior. 2^64 is 1.8 10E19 addresses. There is absolutely no reason to mask to 128bits, it's absurd. (1.8x10E19 is enough address space for every single person on the planet to have two

Re: Avoiding spam blacklists

2017-01-09 Thread Jan Ceuleers
On 09/01/17 16:58, @lbutlr wrote: > (1.8x10E19 is enough address space for every single person on the planet to > have two and a half billion IPs to themselves). 640K RAM ought to be enough for everybody.

Re: Avoiding spam blacklists

2017-01-09 Thread @lbutlr
On 09 Jan 2017, at 10:50, Jan Ceuleers wrote: > On 09/01/17 16:58, @lbutlr wrote: >> (1.8x10E19 is enough address space for every single person on the planet to >> have two and a half billion IPs to themselves). > 640K RAM ought to be enough for everybody. No even similar. The address space for

Re: Avoiding spam blacklists

2017-01-09 Thread @lbutlr
> On 09 Jan 2017, at 12:28, @lbutlr wrote: > > On 09 Jan 2017, at 10:50, Jan Ceuleers wrote: >> On 09/01/17 16:58, @lbutlr wrote: >>> (1.8x10E19 is enough address space for every single person on the planet to >>> have two and a half billion IPs to themselves). >> 640K RAM ought to be enough f