Thanks for the detailed replies. Yes we had the feeling that this task would
be non trivial to put it mildly. We need to decide how we will proceed based
on the this info. Again Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Problem-with-TLS-and-multiple-emails-ove
Pedro David Marco:
> Hi!
> I am doing recipient address verification with reject_unverified _recipient
> and it works pretty well, but i havenoticed that when the sending IP is the
> same as the vrfy probing IP address, then this restriction is not applied.
> does it make sense?
> i have this
Hello,
I couldnt find this on the internet and is was thinking, the postfix list wil
know this.
Customer send email which are rejected by my server. I thinks that is
correctly rejected.
Now i digged into this and i found the following but i dont know if this is
allowed by RFC.
To
On 12/15/2016 8:56 AM, L.P.H. van Belle wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I couldnt find this on the internet and is was thinking, the postfix
> list wil know this.
>
> Customer send email which are rejected by my server. I thinks that
> is correctly rejected.
>
>
>
> Now i digged into this and i f
> On 15 Dec 2016, at 14:56, L.P.H. van Belle wrote:
>
> Now the thing i dont get.
>
> 1) if both ipnumbers have a hostname, why do i see : unknown[1.2.3.4]
Your starting assumption is wrong or mistaken. If the postfix logs are saying
"unknown[1.2.3.4]” it means reverse lookups of tha
Hello Noel/Jim,
Thank you for the replies.
Ok, thats clear, so multple A are allowed but i thing its the way around here.
I'll explain bit more.
I did run also that way, one host multiple ip's but both ip's has a different
helo name to match a/ptr and mx records with it.
But this
> On 15 Dec 2016, at 16:01, L.P.H. van Belle wrote:
>
> Hello Noel/Jim,
>
> Thank you for the replies.
If you’re going to continue hiding the actual names and addresses, don’t bother
posting followups. As far as I know, nobody on this list is a mind reader.
How do you expect anyone to hel
> On Dec 15, 2016, at 9:56 AM, L.P.H. van Belle wrote:
>
> I couldnt find this on the internet and is was thinking, the postfix list wil
> know this.
> Customer send email which are rejected by my server. I thinks that is
> correctly rejected.
>
> Now i digged into this and i found the fo
Thanks Wietse but the sending IP is not listed in $mytetworks...
---Pedro.
From: Wietse Venema
To: Postfix users
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2016 1:15 PM
Subject: Re: Recipient verification with sending IP equal to probe IP
Pedro David Marco:
> Hi!
> I am doing recipient address
Pedro David Marco:
> Thanks Wietse but the sending IP is not listed in $mytetworks... ?
Given your smtpd_mumble_restrictions rule, permit_mynetworks allows
a client to skip the reject_unverified_whatever check.
Oh, and of course this check does not apply at all for mail
that is received with the
On 12/15/2016 10:01 AM, L.P.H. van Belle wrote:
...
> I looks to me and incorrect implementation, what do you guys think.
...
All this is allowed, legal, and unsurprising.
Not everything that is allowed is wise. Ideally, each host (or each
connection on a multi-homed host) should have its own uni
I am a longtime sendmail sysadmin who has seen the writing on the wall.
I have been persuaded to learn Postfix.
I have 2 rented servers: one running sendmail (for a while, works fine)
and the other running Postfix (going through the learning curve)/./
My VPS provider (1and1.com) gives me the
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 02:23:02PM -0600, Ramon F Herrera wrote:
> I have 2 rented servers: one running sendmail (for a while, works fine) and
> the other running Postfix (going through the learning curve)/./
Two servers, potentially two firewall policies.
> My VPS provider (1and1.com) gives me
Hai,
First sorry to have the ips and name anonymized, i had to do that.
I cant expose details until i first talked to the company in question.
Thas a moral thing to do in my believe.
And i need to be sure that i tell the right info when i do that.
The "helo=" space was a copy past error, sorry
When an SMTP server publishes a TLSA record, will DANE enforcing SMTP
servers refuse to connect if the TLSA record matches the certificate but
the certificate has expired?
15 matches
Mail list logo