On 15/09/2016 16:47, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 09:51:11AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Stephan Seitz:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 06:49:08AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
FYI, Postfix uses libmysqlclient. So what's up with not reading
the default config file?
Can it be the usua
Thank you!
The documentation seems a bit ambiguous on this topic. After reading
canonical(5) and the canonical_maps section of postconf(5), I think it's
not clear which of the processing orders, mentioned in the first email,
it actually uses. Would you like me to write a patch for this?
Ondr
canonical(5) section "TABLE SEARCH ORDER":
"With lookups from indexed files such as DB or DBM, or from
networked tables such as NIS, LDAP or SQL, patterns are tried
in the order as listed below:"
That really does what it says: try the first query. Try the second
query. And so o
It just doesn't seem very clear to me. And one of our customers even got
the wrong impression about the search order. I think a sentence like the
following could be dropped in there somewhere: "First, a match of
'user@domain' is searched for across all the listed tables in the order
the tables
On Thu Sep 15 2016 14:00:46 mro...@insiberia.net
said:
>
> But can anyone answer my question - what factors should I consider when
> increasing the limit in the 30-50MB range (or higher)? Are there drawbacks to
> doing this?
The main factor is that the limit used by most everyone is ab
As a new administrator of postfix I am not able to determine which of the two
orders is correct from the existing documentation. An additional sentence
would be very helpful. Perhaps, under canonical(5) section "TABLE SEARCH
ORDER": "Each pattern is looked for across the entire set of tables
