Found the sticky problem. There was a commented out line in “mydestination”
that continued to a second line, and that second line was not commented out.
like this…
#mydestination = $myhostname, localhost.$mydomain, localhost, $mydomain,
mail.$mydomain, www.$mydomain
Fixed, and now on
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 12:14:19PM +0200, Chris wrote:
> what happens, if reject_unverified_recipient is enabled, but the
> server of the relay domain isn't available?
The name of the restriction contains the answer. The recipient
address cannot be verified, so the mail is rejected. See:
http
Getting closer.
Now at least using the command line,
echo 'lists' | mail majordomo
I get this. It is actually looking to deliver it to the command line. =
But not yet...
Jul 7 08:48:21 zeus postfix/pickup[95164]: 2AF4137FD740: uid=3D501 =
from=3D
Jul 7 08:48:21 zeus postfix/cleanup[96311]: 2A
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 12:30:33PM +0100, postmas...@quantum-radio.net wrote:
> Getting closer.
But not understanding some basics.
> Now at least using the command line,
>
> echo 'lists' | mail majordomo
See "man mail" to learn how to use your mailx(1) client. Or, better
yet, as below, just s
On 7/7/2016 8:16 AM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
Note that your problem at this point has*nothing* to do with
majordomo. Switching to Mailman would not change anything.
I second this. I run both Mailman and Majordomo (on separate servers)
and the Postfix configuration is almost identical.
Hi list,
I am performing a migration from a legacy mail server to a new one. I am
afraid that due to "backward compatibility" I have to leave SASL
authentication available over an unencrypted channel.
However, I would like to find sooner or later clients that don't use
STARTTLS befoe authen
W dniu 2016-07-07 o 15:55, Marek Salwerowicz pisze:
Hi list,
I am performing a migration from a legacy mail server to a new one. I
am afraid that due to "backward compatibility" I have to leave SASL
authentication available over an unencrypted channel.
However, I would like to find sooner o
On 7/6/2016 6:55 PM, Homer Wilson Smith wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Jun 2016, Noel Jones wrote:
>> For the other possible combinations of bad DNS setup, you'll need to
>> use a policy service.
>
> OK, can you point me to RTFM for this?
>
Documentation:
http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_POLICY_README.ht
Marek Salwerowicz:
> However, I would like to find sooner or later clients that don't use
> STARTTLS befoe authentication.
>
> How can I configure postfix to see differences in logs?
Assuming that no sane client sends AUTH *before* sending STARTTLS,
all you need is to set "smtpd_tls_loglevel=1" i
W dniu 2016-07-07 o 19:04, Wietse Venema pisze:
Marek Salwerowicz:
However, I would like to find sooner or later clients that don't use
STARTTLS befoe authentication.
How can I configure postfix to see differences in logs?
Assuming that no sane client sends AUTH *before* sending STARTTLS,
all
10 matches
Mail list logo
