Re: mysql local_recipient_map

Paul R. Ganci: > I changed the line hosts = server-1.example.com to use an IP address > instead hosts = 192.168.1.200 and everything started working. Does > anyone know what I am missing in that it seems postfix did resolve the > IP address when communicating with the mysql database? The host l

Re: Mail deferred instead rejected

On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Wietse: > Fix the username lookup, so that Postfix can determine that > the user does not exist. > I found the problem in nssswitch, after removing the ldap everything start work also for the local

Re: postfix virtual domain walking

James B. Byrne wrote: > 3. If there is nothing that involves Postfix then something like what > you propose must be the case. Or someone has gone to some lengths to > scan for these addresses using our domain name as a search term. Every now and then I have seen indications in the mail logs of v

Re: postfix virtual domain walking

On 06/14/16 09:59, Kris Deugau wrote: > James B. Byrne wrote: >> 3. If there is nothing that involves Postfix then something like what >> you propose must be the case. Or someone has gone to some lengths to >> scan for these addresses using our domain name as a search term. > > Every now and the

Re: mysql local_recipient_map

On 06/14/2016 04:28 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: Paul R. Ganci: anyone know what I am missing in that it seems postfix did resolve the IP address when communicating with the mysql database? The host lookup is done by the MSQL library. That doesn't seem correct to me because with hosts = server-1.e

Re: mysql local_recipient_map

Paul R. Ganci: > On 06/14/2016 04:28 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > Paul R. Ganci: > >> anyone know what I am missing in that it seems postfix did resolve the > >> IP address when communicating with the mysql database? > > The host lookup is done by the MSQL library. > That doesn't seem correct to me

Re: global postfix sender whitelist

> Still didn't get any feedback. > Any thoughts about complete white list ? Noel Jones posted a follow-up to your question. But, if you did not receive that, then you won't receive this reply, either. Wietse

Re: global postfix sender whitelist

On 6/14/2016 9:22 AM, Вадим Бажов wrote: > Still didn't get any feedback. > Any thoughts about complete white list ? This was answered. http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.postfix.user/255986

Re: global postfix sender whitelist

On 6/14/2016 12:12 PM, Вадим Бажов wrote: > Didn't receive your answer due to our mailserver maintenance > schedule ( fail ! ;) ) > Thank you for explanations. > Have some questions though. > You say: > >> check_client_access checks either the IP address or the verified >> client hostname. This i

Re: simple greylisting by geoip? milter or policy server?

13. Jun 2016 17:54 by wie...@porcupine.org: > list...@tutanota.com> : >> But then I also read that that 'Policy delegation is now the preferred >> method >> for adding policies to Postfix.' > > Milter support was added later, because some things can't be done > with policy servers. Ok.  I wa

Re: simple greylisting by geoip? milter or policy server?

On 6/14/2016 4:06 PM, list...@tutanota.com wrote: > > Is there some way to integrate the GeoIP dbs with postscreen? No, at least not easily. > > Or for that case is the milter-greylist idea better? Yes, that will work fine for selective greylisting. -- Noel Jones

Re: simple greylisting by geoip? milter or policy server?

> On 6/14/2016 4:06 PM, list...@tutanota.com wrote: >> >> Is there some way to integrate the GeoIP dbs with postscreen? > > No, at least not easily. I would think it would be a Simple Matter of Programming, given a list of the countries and languages you trusted, to generate a list of all the one

sender_dependent_default_transport_maps ignored by smtpd

Hi, I think there is a bug in handling of sender_dependent_default_transport_maps within smtpd when default_transport is set to error:... I'm configuring postfix as follows using default_transport and sender_dependent_default_transport_maps to reject all external outgoing mail, unless the envelop

Re: simple greylisting by geoip? milter or policy server?

14. Jun 2016 15:01 by njo...@megan.vbhcs.org: >> Is there some way to integrate the GeoIP dbs with postscreen? > > No, at least not easily.   Ok.  That would be a nice function to have, in my own opinion. > Or for that case is the milter-greylist idea better? > Yes, that will work fine for

Re: sender_dependent_default_transport_maps ignored by smtpd

To be more specific: the check_recipient_rcpt_maps() function is called multiple places, but the call that fails in this case is in the one at the bottom of smtpd_check_rcpt(). On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Russell Yanofsky wrote: > Hi, > > I think there is a bug in handling of sender_dependen

Re: simple greylisting by geoip? milter or policy server?

On 14/06/16 23:31, list...@tutanota.com wrote: > > 14. Jun 2016 15:01 by njo...@megan.vbhcs.org > : > > Is there some way to integrate the GeoIP dbs with postscreen? > > > No, at least not easily. > > > > Ok. That would be a nice function to have, in

Re: simple greylisting by geoip? milter or policy server?

On 2016-06-14 02:28, list...@tutanota.com wrote: I am considering the installation of Greylisting with Postfix. I want it only for one condition, to greylist mail originating from certain countries. Hi, may be mtpolicyd is an option for you: https://www.mtpolicyd.org It is a modular policyd