Thank you Wietse.
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 4:29 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Thomas kinghorn:
> > Good morning list.
> >
> > I hope someone can assist with a problem.
> >
> > We have a device which uses a GSM sim and a non-configurable device
> setting.
> > It is currently sending data relating to
Isn't this SRS SPF about? http://www.openspf.org/SRS
John Allen:
> Is there a way of negating a smtpd condition.
> For example if I were to apply c "check_sender_access sql_lookup" under
> submission in master.cf would it be possible to say something like
> !check_check_acess ... under smtpd restrctions
>
> The idea being that if example.com is all
Wietse Venema:
> John Allen:
> > Is there a way of negating a smtpd condition.
> > For example if I were to apply c "check_sender_access sql_lookup" under
> > submission in master.cf would it be possible to say something like
> > !check_check_acess ... under smtpd restrctions
> >
> > The idea bei
Sebastian Nielsen wrote:
> Another way, that is the preferred RFC way to do it, is to encapsulate the
> mail in a new message/rfc822 container, and adding Fwd: to the original
> subject of the outside container.
> (This is how most mail clients "forward" a message)
I can't speak to most of the re
On 4/13/2016 10:26 PM, Michael Nguyen wrote:
> So, I'm having an issue with "Bad Sender Address Syntax" errors. The
> errors are from a variety of formatted email address including some
> strange ones like . At first, I would
> shrug my shoulders to them but my customers started whining and they
>
16-04-14 9:16 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Wietse Venema:
John Allen:
Is there a way of negating a smtpd condition.
For example if I were to apply c "check_sender_access sql_lookup" under
submission in master.cf would it be possible to say something like
!check_check_acess ... under smtpd restrcti
The web.de domain has just published DANE TLSA records for its MX
hosts. This follows earlier "pilot" deployments with the smaller
mail.com and mail.de domains.
web.de. IN MX 100 mx-ha02.web.de. ; AD=1
_25._tcp.mx-ha02.web.de. IN TLSA 3 1 1
409c9e91a2a9f4d7881dbf0094b3839d4343a4a57d9bf55
Hello,
I'm running a FreeBSD 10.3 AMD64 system. I just upgraded Postfix from
2.11 to 3.1. I'm using Dovecot for Sasl authentication via mysql and
email storage via maildir.
The system can receive emails from the internet via port 25, (running
postscreen), and store them on disk using dovecot, no
On 4/14/2016 2:49 PM, David Mehler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm running a FreeBSD 10.3 AMD64 system. I just upgraded Postfix from
> 2.11 to 3.1. I'm using Dovecot for Sasl authentication via mysql and
> email storage via maildir.
>
...
> On the server side of things the submission/smtpd service gets t
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 03:49:32PM -0400, David Mehler wrote:
> # Set the smtputf8 option because the dovecot service was not working
> smtputf8_enable = no
> compatibility_level =
Do not dial up compatibility to 11. That's a bad idea, set it only
to the actual compatibility level of your m
On 14 Apr 2016, at 15:49, David Mehler wrote:
Lastly, related to antispam, currently I'm running MailScanner,
So you don't really care about your email?
There's a warning about the inherently risky and unsupported mechanism
MailScanner uses to get mail from Postfix at
http://www.postfix.org
12 matches
Mail list logo
