Re: socket: malformed response

2015-11-20 Thread Wietse Venema
Viktor Dukhovni: > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 03:26:27PM -0800, Vicki Brown wrote: > > > The only program that uses /usr/local/cutedge/postfix/etc is.. postfix. > > Well, the real Postfix uses /etc/postfix, as evidenced by the errors > logged by postdrop(1). Whatever is asking sendmail(1) and postd

Re: socket: malformed response

2015-11-20 Thread Wietse Venema
Wietse Venema: > Viktor Dukhovni: > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 03:26:27PM -0800, Vicki Brown wrote: > > > > > The only program that uses /usr/local/cutedge/postfix/etc is.. postfix. > > > > Well, the real Postfix uses /etc/postfix, as evidenced by the errors > > logged by postdrop(1). Whatever is

Re: 100 Recipient Limit

2015-11-20 Thread Matt Bayliss
On 18 November 2015 at 16:18, Wietse Venema wrote: > > This ends with: > > Nov 18 10:28:52 mailserver postfix/smtpd[31664]: < unknown[1.1.1.1]: > RCPT TO: > ... > Nov 18 10:28:52 mailserver postfix/smtpd[31664]: > unknown[1.1.1.1]: > 250 2.1.5 Ok > ... > Nov 18 10:28:52 mailse

Re: 100 Recipient Limit

2015-11-20 Thread Wietse Venema
Wietse: > Note that the last RCPT TO command was not delivered to Postfix. I > therefore suspect that you have some anti-malware system that breaks > connections when a client sends suspicious email. Matt Bayliss: > I checked the hardware firewall config, which does have a threat detection > & shu

Re: 100 Recipient Limit

2015-11-20 Thread Bill Cole
On 18 Nov 2015, at 10:34, Matt Bayliss wrote: [4] TCP stream decoded acket capture of above session http://pastebin.centos.org/36261/ The first line there which should be a SMTP greeting banner is instead: 220 That matches what I see when telnetti

Re: body_checks syntax for multi line?

2015-11-20 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:44:25AM -0800, Terry Barnum wrote: > I'm trying to be a little more specific in a body_check to reject certain > spoofed spam. I have it currently working when searching for just a single > line but would like to learn how to expand the search to multiple lines. Not pos

Re: body_checks syntax for multi line?

2015-11-20 Thread Wietse Venema
Viktor Dukhovni: > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:44:25AM -0800, Terry Barnum wrote: > > > I'm trying to be a little more specific in a body_check to reject certain > > spoofed spam. I have it currently working when searching for just a single > > line but would like to learn how to expand the search

body_checks syntax for multi line?

2015-11-20 Thread Terry Barnum
I'm trying to be a little more specific in a body_check to reject certain spoofed spam. I have it currently working when searching for just a single line but would like to learn how to expand the search to multiple lines. The spam looks like (modified to prevent being rejected by the body_checks

message size limits

2015-11-20 Thread Chris Boylan
Looking at message_size_limit and mailbox_size_limit, if I want to allow internal users the ability to send 100M emails it seems like 1) applies to all messages both in-bound and out-bound and 2) I'll need to increase mailbox_size_limit to what factor of message_size_limit?

Re: message size limits

2015-11-20 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 05:42:13PM -0600, Chris Boylan wrote: > Looking at message_size_limit and mailbox_size_limit, if I want to allow > internal users the ability to send 100M emails it seems like 1) applies to all > messages both in-bound and out-bound Your internal users can use an MSA and m