Hello,
I am doing greylisting in smtpd_client_restrictions and later
a policy server check in smtpd_recipient_restrictions (postconf
included below). smtpd_delay_reject is on (the default).
The weird behaviour I am seeing is that despite a greylisting match
(4xx) in sender restrictions, the recip
Hello,
I'll have a project to send 300-400k emails a day from a new IP address
with one server. This can build up a signifficant mail queue on the
server.
We have several similar solutions already working but this time the idea
is to have me do this on a VPS (no SSD drives involved), h
* Istvan Prosinger :
> Hello,
>
> I'll have a project to send 300-400k emails a day from a new IP
> address with one server. This can build up a signifficant mail queue
> on the server.
> We have several similar solutions already working but this time the
> idea is to have me do this on a VPS (no
Em 13/11/15 08:09, Patrick Ben Koetter escreveu:
* Istvan Prosinger :
Hello,
I'll have a project to send 300-400k emails a day from a new IP
address with one server. This can build up a signifficant mail queue
on the server.
We have several similar solutions already working but this time the
id
Em 13/11/15 08:09, Patrick Ben Koetter escreveu:
* Istvan Prosinger :
Hello,
I'll have a project to send 300-400k emails a day from a new IP
address with one server. This can build up a signifficant mail queue
on the server.
We have several similar solutions already working but this time the
id
On 2015-11-13 12:53, Leonardo Rodrigues wrote:
Em 13/11/15 08:09, Patrick Ben Koetter escreveu:
* Istvan Prosinger :
Hello,
I'll have a project to send 300-400k emails a day from a new IP
address with one server. This can build up a signifficant mail queue
on the server.
We have several simila
On 13 November 2015 at 07:51, Istvan Prosinger wrote:
>
> The point here is that at the start of this, a temporary deferred mail
> queue will build up signifficantly pushing most of the load on the file
> system, and the idea is to speed up the queue processing to prevent killing
> the server (ex
On 11/13/15 04:44, Istvan Prosinger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'll have a project to send 300-400k emails a day from a new IP address
> with one server. This can build up a signifficant mail queue on the
> server.
> We have several similar solutions already working but this time the idea
> is to have
On 12 Nov 2015, at 21:41, Chris Boylan wrote:
In the process of converting from courier to postfix. Test
configuration
receives email fine except from google (gmail) which drops us without
really
complaining:
Substantial abridgment for relevance follows...
Nov 12 20:00:41 mail0 postfix/s
I'd rather not have the conversation(s) here on the Postfix list, but I've
received two update requests to Stan Hoeppner's fqrdns.pcre file, which
many of us are using (I volunteered to host the file on GitHub after Stan
went offline).
I'd like to invite Postfix users to chime in on the GitHub dis
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 09:12:54PM +1300, martin f krafft wrote:
> I am doing greylisting in smtpd_client_restrictions and later
> a policy server check in smtpd_recipient_restrictions (postconf
> included below). smtpd_delay_reject is on (the default).
Greylisting typically generates a "defer_if
So: you've got a connection, a plaintext EHLO and reply, STARTTLS
command and complete setup of a strong TLS session, another EHLO & reply
inside the TLS session, but then:
> Nov 12 20:00:41 mail0 postfix/smtpd[24249]: smtp_get: EOF
> Nov 12 20:00:41 mail0 postfix/smtpd[24249]: match_hostname:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 08:41:43PM -0600, Chris Boylan wrote:
> In the process of converting from courier to postfix. Test configuration
> receives email fine except from google (gmail) which drops us without really
> complaining:
>
> Nov 12 20:00:41 mail0 postfix/smtpd[24249]: initializing the
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
On Behalf Of Viktor Dukhovni
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2015 11:10
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: new deployment fails to receive email from "just" gmail
successfully
On Thu, Nov
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 12:03:51PM -0600, Chris Boylan wrote:
> > > In the process of converting from courier to postfix. Test configuration
> > > receives email fine except from google (gmail) which drops us without
> > > really
> > > complaining:
> > >
> > > Nov 12 20:00:41 mail0 postfix/smtp
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
On Behalf Of Viktor Dukhovni
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2015 12:13
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: new deployment fails to receive email from "just" gmail
successfully
On Fri, Nov
also sprach Viktor Dukhovni [2015-11-14 05:43
+1300]:
> > I am doing greylisting in smtpd_client_restrictions and later
> > a policy server check in smtpd_recipient_restrictions (postconf
> > included below). smtpd_delay_reject is on (the default).
>
> Greylisting typically generates a "defer_if
On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 08:03:41AM +1300, martin f krafft wrote:
> > > postgrey[27226]: action=greylist, reason=new, client_name=unknown,
> > > client_address=120.28.68.66, sender=reconnoitering...@bk.ru,
> > > recipient=new-...@pobox.madduck.net
> >
> > Replies with "defer_if_permit".
I got two options that I know of. Signifficantly shortening the queue
lifetime, or (not) losing the queue from the RAM disk.
Just trying to measure which is worse (or to hear something new for me)
On 13.11.2015 16:17, Phil Stracchino wrote:
On 11/13/15 04:44, Istvan Prosinger wrote:
Hello,
I'
We deliver tens of millions per server per day using SSD spools...
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:18 AM Istvan Prosinger
wrote:
> I got two options that I know of. Signifficantly shortening the queue
> lifetime, or (not) losing the queue from the RAM disk.
> Just trying to measure which is worse (or
Ok. As I mentioned, SSD is not an option on this project. Only RAM or
Raid 10 (shared with other VPSes)
On 13.11.2015 20:56, Ken Simpson wrote:
We deliver tens of millions per server per day using SSD spools...
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:18 AM Istvan Prosinger mailto:ist...@prosinger.net>> wrot
On 11/13/15 14:17, Istvan Prosinger wrote:
> I got two options that I know of. Signifficantly shortening the queue
> lifetime, or (not) losing the queue from the RAM disk.
> Just trying to measure which is worse (or to hear something new for me)
If you lack disk space for the queue, the server in
On 13 Nov 2015, at 13:44, Chris Boylan wrote:
There is no port number in the log messages you reference. How do I
interpret
what's there as a port 587 connection rather than a port 25
connection?
This log line:
Nov 12 20:00:41 mail0 postfix/smtpd[24249]: send attr ident =
submission:209.85
23 matches
Mail list logo
