transport and DNS issues

2015-07-22 Thread Peter
Hi guys, I have recently switched from relayhost and smtp_fallback_relay to hash:/etc/postfix/transport method where I have a domain (mx-relay.internal) declared with multiple MX records which have different weights (mx10, mx11, mx12 and mx13). These servers do not have IN A record, but IN MX. T

Re: transport and DNS issues

2015-07-22 Thread Wietse Venema
Peter: > Hi guys, > > I have recently switched from relayhost and smtp_fallback_relay to > hash:/etc/postfix/transport method where I have a domain > (mx-relay.internal) declared with multiple MX records which have > different weights (mx10, mx11, mx12 and mx13). These servers do not have > IN A

sender_dependent_default_transport_maps for aliases?

2015-07-22 Thread Edgaras Lukoševičius
Hello, i have few outbound transports in master.cf like this: outbound1 unix - - n - - smtp -o syslog_name=outbound1 -o smtp_helo_name=reverse.do.main -o smtp_bind_address=X.X.X.X outbound2 unix - - n - -

Re: sender_dependent_default_transport_maps for aliases?

2015-07-22 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 05:01:48PM +0300, Edgaras Luko?evi?ius wrote: > Now I have some aliases in SQL `alias` table. Are these virtual(5) aliases or local aliases(5)? > By default when postfix > unpacks this alias and sees external recipient it will send email through > first primary IP address

Re: sender_dependent_default_transport_maps for aliases?

2015-07-22 Thread Edgaras Lukoševičius
All this is done to put users into our own "classes" (eg. spammers vs. non-spammers). Because there are clean and dirty IP pools and if we see that user *may be* abusing email (or any other) system we want to put them to "dirty" pool for some time. While this works with ordinary senders, it doe

Re: sender_dependent_default_transport_maps for aliases?

2015-07-22 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 05:55:04PM +0300, Edgaras Luko?evi?ius wrote: > All this is done to put users into our own "classes" (eg. spammers vs. > non-spammers). If your autheneticated submission user is spamming, suspend their ability to send outbound email. > Because there are clean and dirty IP

Re: sender_dependent_default_transport_maps for aliases?

2015-07-22 Thread Wietse Venema
Edgaras Luko?evi?ius: > All this is done to put users into our own "classes" (eg. spammers vs. > non-spammers). Because there are clean and dirty IP pools and if we see > that user *may be* abusing email (or any other) system we want to put > them to "dirty" pool for some time. While this works

missing COMPATIBILITY_README

2015-07-22 Thread Eray Aslan
COMPATIBILITY_README and its html version seems to be missing from the final installation. --- postfix-files 2014-06-25 20:06:00.0 + +++ postfix-files 2015-07-22 15:38:57.0 + @@ -274,6 +274,7 @@ $readme_directory/BASIC_CONFIGURATION_README:f:root:-:644 $readme

Re: sender_dependent_default_transport_maps for aliases?

2015-07-22 Thread Edgaras Lukoševičius
On 22/07/15 18:05, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 05:55:04PM +0300, Edgaras Luko?evi?ius wrote: All this is done to put users into our own "classes" (eg. spammers vs. non-spammers). If your autheneticated submission user is spamming, suspend their ability to send outbound ema

Re: sender_dependent_default_transport_maps for aliases?

2015-07-22 Thread Edgaras Lukoševičius
Thanks. On 22/07/15 18:49, Wietse Venema wrote: Edgaras Luko?evi?ius: All this is done to put users into our own "classes" (eg. spammers vs. non-spammers). Because there are clean and dirty IP pools and if we see that user *may be* abusing email (or any other) system we want to put them to "dir