AW: header_checks not working

2015-03-13 Thread Krinninger, Reinhold
Hello, thanks for all the fast(!) and interesting responses. I'm trying to use this proposal, looks for me to be best solution: > Simplify... >/^From: .*root@itu-smtp2\.br\.de/ WARN >/^From: .*@itu-smtp2\.br\.de/ REJECT invalid hostname in From: header >> >> /^From: .*\@.*/ WARN >/^From: / W

Different smtp_helo_name depending on IP version

2015-03-13 Thread Mike Cardwell
I'd like to send a different "smtp_helo_name" depending on if the outgoing connection is IPv6 or IPv4. Is this possible in Postfix? I just want my forward dns/reverse dns/helo to all match, but I have less control over my RDNS than I need in order to do this and so I'm wondering if I can get a qui

Bandwidth choke issue between remote offices and SMPT server.

2015-03-13 Thread jayesh shinde
Title: netCORE is present at eTail Asia, CeBIT, ClickzLive & 3rd Email Marketing Summit netCORE is present at

Re: Tracking down www-data email sender

2015-03-13 Thread Javier Alonso
Hi, The best you can do is use a sendmail wrapper like this https://github.com/onlime/sendmail-wrapper But if you want track it down, check the webserver log for this subdomain. It will help you. In addition you should check if the website is infected. Malware detect: https://www.rfxn.com/proje

Re: Bandwidth choke issue between remote offices and SMPT server.

2015-03-13 Thread Noel Jones
On 3/13/2015 5:18 AM, jayesh shinde wrote: > Hi , > > I am facing problem of bandwidth choke issue between remote location > and SMPT server. > Please giude for below. Want to know how the other busy servers are > handling such issues. > > scenario :-- > - > 1) I have centralize high

Re: Bandwidth choke issue between remote offices and SMPT server.

2015-03-13 Thread lst_hoe02
Zitat von jayesh shinde : Hi , I am facing problem of bandwidth choke issue between remote location and SMPT server. Please giude for below. Want to know how the other busy servers are handling such issues. scenario  :-- - 1) I have centralize high traffic SM

Re: Different smtp_helo_name depending on IP version

2015-03-13 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 09:51:59AM +, Mike Cardwell wrote: > I'd like to send a different "smtp_helo_name" depending on if the outgoing > connection is IPv6 or IPv4. Is this possible in Postfix? Not at present. > FWIW, in Exim I would do this by adding something like this to my > smtp transp

RE: Bandwidth choke issue between remote offices and SMPT server.

2015-03-13 Thread Michael Fox
I am facing problem of bandwidth choke issue between remote location and SMPT server. Please giude for below. Want to know how the other busy servers are handling such issues. Jayesh, this is what QoS/prioritization are for on your routers. The specifics will depend on what type of router/

Re: SMTP AUTH issue

2015-03-13 Thread Emmanuel Fusté
Le 11/03/2015 16:54, Emmanuel Fusté a écrit : Le 11/03/2015 16:39, Viktor Dukhovni a écrit : On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 01:41:00PM +0100, Emmanuel Fust? wrote: Hello, On a heavy i/o loaded Postfix (2.11.0) server, i've got this behavior: 535 5.7.8 Error: authentication failed: Connection lost t

master.cf service documentation

2015-03-13 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Hi, I've been looking for documentation about what the various services in master.cf do. I can't seem to find any documentation for that. I can guess what a few of those do because the command they run is documented. But it's not always clear what it means exactly. >From examples I've seen, it

Re: SMTP AUTH issue

2015-03-13 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 05:14:24PM +0100, Emmanuel Fust? wrote: > >>You could try the patch below and report your results (presumably > >>for Dovecot). It would be nice to have confirmation for Cyrus > >>also. > > > >Will test and report the result asap. > > Ok work as expected ! Thank you. > > B

Re: SMTP AUTH issue

2015-03-13 Thread Emmanuel Fusté
Le 13/03/2015 17:14, Emmanuel Fusté a écrit : Le 11/03/2015 16:54, Emmanuel Fusté a écrit : Le 11/03/2015 16:39, Viktor Dukhovni a écrit : On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 01:41:00PM +0100, Emmanuel Fust? wrote: Hello, On a heavy i/o loaded Postfix (2.11.0) server, i've got this behavior: 535 5.7.8

Asymmetric mail limits?

2015-03-13 Thread Brainslug
Hi, my mail server is configured to accept incoming email for local users and to relay outbound email to an off-site mail server. Is it possible to configure postfix to accept all incoming email regardless of size but decline all outgoing email exceeding a predefined size limit? If I set message_

Re: Asymmetric mail limits?

2015-03-13 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 01:46:07PM -0700, Brainslug wrote: > Is it possible to configure postfix to accept all incoming email regardless > of size but decline all outgoing email exceeding a predefined size limit? You'll need to use separate smtpd(8) listener for the outbound mail and an associate

Re: postscreen vs. fail2ban

2015-03-13 Thread Istvan Prosinger
Hi Wietse, One benefit of using fail2ban (for me) is a definitely cleaner mail log for these cases. Regards, Istvan On 12.3.2015 2:30, Wietse Venema wrote: Michael Fox: I haven't implemented postscreen yet, but plan to. So this question is for the postscreen experts here. As I understand