G'day,
I've been running sendmail for years with cyrus and realtime address
checking to (supposedly!) stop backscatter, but it seems to be broken,
so it's probably a good time to migrate to postfix (been putting off for
years ...)
This document isn't very helpful :
http://www.postfix.org/CY
Am 01.02.2015 um 08:59 schrieb Carl Brewer:
>
> G'day,
> I've been running sendmail for years with cyrus and realtime address
> checking to (supposedly!) stop backscatter, but it seems to be broken,
> so it's probably a good time to migrate to postfix (been putting off for
> years ...)
>
> This d
> On Jan 31, 2015, at 8:59 PM, Bill Cole
> wrote:
>
> I do not use that rejection criteria but instead use
> reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname,
I do use that, and have for a long time.
> which only requires that a PTR exists. On other systems I manage, I mostly DO
> use reject_unknown_
On Jan 31, 2015, at 9:29 PM, Bill Cole
wrote:
> Which doesn't mean you don't have some other Postfix binaries lurking...
Good point.
There are files in /usr/sbin/ and in /usr/local/sbin/ and it appears that the
command directory is set to the latter, which appears to be 2.10.5
Seeing what bre
On Jan 31, 2015, at 7:15 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 05:16:33PM -0700, LuKreme wrote:
>
>> The start was just date stamp info and PID:
>>
>> Jan 31 01:52:10 mail postfix/smtpd[62297]: warning: TLS library problem:
>> error:14094412:SSL routines:SSL3_READ_BYTES:sslv3 ale
Am 01.02.2015 um 10:01 schrieb LuKreme:
On Jan 31, 2015, at 9:29 PM, Bill Cole
wrote:
Which doesn't mean you don't have some other Postfix binaries lurking...
Good point.
There are files in /usr/sbin/ and in /usr/local/sbin/ and it appears that the
command directory is set to the latter,
Hi,
I searched allover the docs, but could not find information, if the smtp-client
of Postfix can do the PIPELIING extension.
I have two Postfix instances on the same host. One is MX-out and the other one
is a MSA for clients. The MSA uses dane-only, while the server has the
fingerprint of th
On 1/02/2015 7:21 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
and where is your postfix conf..?
read i.e
http://de.postfix.org/httpmirror/postconf.5.html#smtpd_reject_unlisted_recipient
as well as other setup examples and conf stuff
I checked the server from another server, not telnet'ing from localhost
On 01 Feb 2015, at 10:13, LuKreme wrote:
> On Jan 31, 2015, at 7:15 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 05:16:33PM -0700, LuKreme wrote:
>>
>>> The start was just date stamp info and PID:
>>>
>>> Jan 31 01:52:10 mail postfix/smtpd[62297]: warning: TLS library problem:
>>>
Hi,
We are using zimbra 8.0. My postfix is allowing to send email without
password authentication. Although this is for inter-domain but still it
should ask for password.
I am in trouble.
Kindly advise some solution.
Regards,
Vishal Agarwal
Christian R??ner:
> I searched allover the docs, but could not find information, if
> the smtp-client of Postfix can do the PIPELIING extension.
Have you tried "man 8 smtp"?
Wietse
SMTP(8)SMTP(8)
NAME
smtp - Postfix
LuKreme:
> >> $ postfix reload
> >> postfix/postlog: fatal: bad string length 2 > 1: recipient_delimiter = +_
> >> postsuper: fatal: bad string length 2 > 1: recipient_delimiter = +_
> >> mail /etc/postfix] $ postconf recipient_delimiter mail_version
> >> recipient_delimiter = +_
> >> mail_version
> Am 01.02.2015 um 13:58 schrieb Wietse Venema :
>
> Christian R??ner:
>> I searched allover the docs, but could not find information, if
>> the smtp-client of Postfix can do the PIPELIING extension.
>
> Have you tried "man 8 smtp“?
Yes
> Wietse
>
> SMTP(8)
On Sun, 1 Feb 2015 18:26:18 +0530, Vishal Agarwal stated:
> We are using zimbra 8.0. My postfix is allowing to send email without
> password authentication. Although this is for inter-domain but still it
> should ask for password.
1) Don't use HTML email. Gmail has an option for TEXT. Use it when
>> RFC 2821 (SMTP protocol)
>> --==>> RFC 2920 (SMTP Pipelining) <<==—
>
> Ok, I missed that, but…
Ok, just looked at the RFC. I thought, it required a initial command, but it
doesn’t ;-) Simply start pipelining, …
Thanks
Christian
--
Bachelor of Science Informatik
Erlenwiese 14, 36304 Al
Christian R??ner:
> > ...
> > RFC 1651 (SMTP service extensions)
...
> > --==>> RFC 2920 (SMTP Pipelining) <<==?
...
>
> ? do I need an option to enable it, or does Postfix use it
> automatically, if announced by the server?
Instead of reading the RFC for you on the mailing list, I reco
Dear Sir,
Pl find the below.
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
always_add_missing_headers = yes
always_bcc = xx...@xxx.
bounce_notice_recipient = postmaster
bounce_queue_lifetime = 6h
broken_sasl_auth_clients = yes
command_directory = /opt/zimbra/postfix/sbin
config_directory = /opt/zimb
On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 02:13:46AM -0700, LuKreme wrote:
> > Which confirms that the problem is with your SMTP server as expected.
>
> It does?
Sorry, confirms that the problem is observed on the server side.
The evidence to conclude which side is not there. However, both
Postfix and OpenSSL ar
On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 07:07:42PM +0530, Vishal Agarwal wrote:
> bounce_queue_lifetime = 6h
> maximal_queue_lifetime = 1d
Too short. The RFC recommended time is 5 days. Don't set these
shorter than 2 days, allowing sites 1 day to notice a problem and
another day to fix it.
> message_size_limi
Although I do not see any signs of backscatter in my mail logs. Is there a
way of testing to ensure that I am not a potential source of backscatter?
On 01 Feb 2015, at 03:13 , li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
> if you build software from source build native packages for your OS, that
> cleans up things and avoids the system pulling the OS vendors version which
> conflicts with something below /usr/local
I normally do that, but in this case I was upgr
On 01 Feb 2015, at 05:41 , DTNX Postmaster wrote:
> By the way, CA-signed certificates start at less than $10/year, so if you
> ever do run into an issue which might be resolved by getting one, and your
> configuration isn't too complex, I would suggest spending that little bit of
> money.
>
>
Am 01.02.2015 um 22:26 schrieb LuKreme:
On 01 Feb 2015, at 05:41 , DTNX Postmaster wrote:
By the way, CA-signed certificates start at less than $10/year, so if you ever
do run into an issue which might be resolved by getting one, and your
configuration isn't too complex, I would suggest spe
On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 10:32:53PM +0100, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
> just make it once in your lifetime, create a template for default params and
> a script with minimal maintainance like for hash-method and keylength - the
> script below in any case builds a self signed PEM with key and cert as we
Am 01.02.2015 um 23:15 schrieb Viktor Dukhovni:
On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 10:32:53PM +0100, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
just make it once in your lifetime, create a template for default params and
a script with minimal maintainance like for hash-method and keylength - the
script below in any case bui
On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 11:42:30PM +0100, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
> >For MSAs offering service to Joe Public, sure you'll want a CA-issued
> >cert.
>
> I only referred to "the interval between expiry is long enough that I get to
> learn everything over from first principles every time I have to r
delivery status notification
filters, to work-in-progress support for internationalized email
addresses.
The experimental release Postfix-3.1-20150201 contains the same
code as the Postfix 3.0 stable release candidate.
Wietse
Hi Victor,
Thanks a lot for all the problems marked out in my postfix config file
I will incorporate a those all and test further.
Regards,
Vishal Agarwal
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 11:41 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 07:07:42PM +0530, Vishal Agarwal wrote:
>
>> bounce_queue
28 matches
Mail list logo
