delaying mail before passing to next hop

2014-11-13 Thread btb
hi- short version: i have an mx which, after doing the initial handling [postscreen, etc] of messages arriving from the internet, relays mail to another computer for content filtering [amavis/spamassassin]: relay_transport = lmtp-filter:[mfa.example.com]:lmtp-filter-external after a message ha

Re: delaying mail before passing to next hop

2014-11-13 Thread Robert Schetterer
Am 13.11.2014 um 18:14 schrieb b...@bitrate.net: > hi- > > short version: > i have an mx which, after doing the initial handling [postscreen, etc] of > messages arriving from the internet, relays mail to another computer for > content filtering [amavis/spamassassin]: > > relay_transport = lmtp-

PCRE question

2014-11-13 Thread J.
Why does this text match the pcre? As I read it, there must be a line break after the underscores to match, but it's matching. Does . match linebreaks?: Text: "For Testing Only: __ xxx From: My Name To: any one " PCRE rule: /*[\s\n\r]*(.*) (.*)@

Re: PCRE question

2014-11-13 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 10:08:54AM -0800, J. wrote: > PCRE rule: > /*[\s\n\r]*(.*) (.*)@test.com/ REJECT testing > Why does this text match the pcre? As I read it, there must be > a line break after the underscores to match, Actually, no, because the [\s\n\r]* matches an

Re: PCRE question

2014-11-13 Thread Erwan David
Le 13/11/2014 19:08, J. a écrit : > Why does this text match the pcre? As I read it, there must be a line > break after the underscores to match, but it's matching. Does . match > linebreaks?: > > Text: > "For Testing Only: __ xxx > > From: My Name > To: any one " > >

Re: delaying mail before passing to next hop

2014-11-13 Thread Noel Jones
On 11/13/2014 11:14 AM, b...@bitrate.net wrote: > hi- > > short version: > i have an mx which, after doing the initial handling [postscreen, etc] of > messages arriving from the internet, relays mail to another computer for > content filtering [amavis/spamassassin]: > > relay_transport = lmtp-f

Preventing sendmail -f option

2014-11-13 Thread Mehmet Tolga Avcioglu
Is there a way to prevent sendmail -f option from being used to change the envelope sender address? Thanks -- Mehmet

white list

2014-11-13 Thread Ruben Safir
WHat are some suggsted methods of whitelisting with postfix. I am throwing in the flag and want to prevent email to me without my specific permision, and to bounce the rest. Ruben -- So many immigrant groups have swept through our town that Brooklyn, like Atlantis, reaches mythological propor

Re: Preventing sendmail -f option

2014-11-13 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 12:01:56AM +0200, Mehmet Tolga Avcioglu wrote: > Is there a way to prevent sendmail -f option from being used to change the > envelope sender address? However pickup(8) records the user's uid in the Received header. Not allowing local submission from remote senders would

Re: PCRE question

2014-11-13 Thread J.
Thanks. I guess I'll have to dig into the SA rules for that then. From: Viktor Dukhovni To: postfix-users@postfix.org Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 10:17 AM Subject: Re: PCRE question On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 10:08:54AM -0800, J. wrote: > PCRE rule: > /_

Re: white list

2014-11-13 Thread Wietse Venema
Ruben Safir: > WHat are some suggsted methods of whitelisting with postfix. > > I am throwing in the flag and want to prevent email to me without my > specific permision, and to bounce the rest. This does exactly what you ask, but you probably need more. /etc/postfix/main.cf: smtp_sender_r

Re: delaying mail before passing to next hop

2014-11-13 Thread LuKreme
On Nov 13, 2014, at 1:02 PM, Noel Jones wrote: > This is exactly why greylisting was invented. Have you tried that? Greylisting has a host of problems of its own though. Even with a dedicated mail admin who is really trying to keep up on all the mail coming in, you *will* lose mail with greyli

Re: delaying mail before passing to next hop

2014-11-13 Thread btb
On Nov 13, 2014, at 15.02, Noel Jones wrote: > > On 11/13/2014 11:14 AM, b...@bitrate.net wrote: >> hi- >> >> short version: >> i have an mx which, after doing the initial handling [postscreen, etc] of >> messages arriving from the internet, relays mail to another computer for >> content filte

Re: delaying mail before passing to next hop

2014-11-13 Thread btb
> On Nov 13, 2014, at 13.00, Robert Schetterer wrote: > > Am 13.11.2014 um 18:14 schrieb b...@bitrate.net: >> hi- >> >> short version: >> i have an mx which, after doing the initial handling [postscreen, etc] of >> messages arriving from the internet, relays mail to another computer for >> con

Release date of Postfix 3.0?

2014-11-13 Thread Patrik Båt
Hello! Is there a set release date for Postfix 3.0, or is it released when its "done"? - Patrik signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature