Dear All
Now I have setup email system in my host.
I am able to receive the mail.
But when I try to send mail I get below error
*SMTP Error (-1): Connection to server failed.*
I am sure, port SMTPD is running at 587 (I can do telnet).
Then I checked the error log, I see
*postfix/submission/s
Am 22.10.2014 um 10:49 schrieb Austin Einter:
Then I checked the error log, I see
/*postfix/submission/smtpd[1629]: connect from localhost[127.0.0.1]
postfix/submission/smtpd[1629]: lost connection after UNKNOWN from
localhost[127.0.0.1]*/
I am not sure, why postfix is refusing connection even
This issue was resolved by changing port to 465. Not sure why 587 do not
work.
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 2:39 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
>
> Am 22.10.2014 um 10:49 schrieb Austin Einter:
>
>> Then I checked the error log, I see
>>
>> /*postfix/submission/smtpd[1629]: connect from localhost[127.0.
Am 22.10.2014 um 11:53 schrieb Austin Einter:
This issue was resolved by changing port to 465. Not sure why 587 do not
work.
because you need to understand that 587 is STARTTLS and 465 is not and
so you need the correct client configuration for the port
https://www.fastmail.fm/help/technic
On Wednesday, October 22, 2014, 4:53:35 AM, Austin wrote:
> This issue was resolved by changing port to 465. Not sure why 587 do not work.
When using port 587, the e-mail client has to send STARTTLS to
establish a connection. Check to see if your e-mail client has such a
setting.
Using
Dear All
Now I am able to send receive mail from my domain.
Now I wanted to create new email accounts using below command.
useradd -s /sbin/nologin username
passwd username
User is added to machine.
Next I tried to login to that account from my mail client, it fails.
When I checked /var/mail f
Salvatore Palazzolo:
> Dear Wietse.
> We already discuss about a TLS question a lot of months ago.
> I have now an other question for you.
> Is it possible avoid that if my Postfix send an email to an External Domain
> which is required to be encrypt in TLS, the email is kept in deferred queue?
>
I just want to know how new email accounts are created.
When I create a new user, by default I expect a mail file should be created
in /var/mail/ or /var/mail/domain folder. Is not it the case? Kindly let
me know, what is the right procedure to create a new mail account for
postfix+dovecot email
Austin Einter:
> I just want to know how new email accounts are created.
This is the POSTFIX mailing list. Postfix does not manage accounts.
Accounts are managed with DOVECOT.
Wietse
> When I create a new user, by default I expect a mail file should be created
> in /var/mail/ or /var/mai
The basic idea is to permit more than one action in an access(5) or
header_checks(5) table lookup result or SMTPD policy response:
A few examples to clarify:
/etc/postfix/access:
# The new multi-action form.
1.2.3.4 { prepend header text... } other actions...
/etc/postfix/header_checks:
Am 22.10.2014 um 15:49 schrieb Wietse Venema:
The basic idea is to permit more than one action in an access(5) or
header_checks(5) table lookup result or SMTPD policy response:
A few examples to clarify:
/etc/postfix/access:
# The new multi-action form.
1.2.3.4 { prepend header text.
li...@rhsoft.net:
> what i would love is more than one lookup key like specify a action for
> a pair "sender rcpt action" what would it make really easy do define
> whitelists and blacklists in access tables
>
> @postfix.org @rhsoft.net OK
> @example.org @rhsoft.net REJECT
> a...@example.org li.
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 04:00:14PM +0200, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
> What I would love is more than one lookup key, for example to specify an
> action for a sender/recipient pair. This would it make really easy to
> define whitelists and blacklists in access tables
For now, this can be done with
Am 22.10.2014 um 16:22 schrieb Viktor Dukhovni:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 04:00:14PM +0200, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
What I would love is more than one lookup key, for example to specify an
action for a sender/recipient pair. This would it make really easy to
define whitelists and blacklists in
I'm running Postfix 2.11 and I'm having some issues with the
check_sender_access parameter. Currently my configuration for sender
restrictions is the following:
smtpd_sender_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks
check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/valid_senders
reje
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 07:41:22PM +0100, Nicol?s wrote:
The claim in the subject line is simply implausible. Such major
problems in access(5) processing would not go unnoticed.
> smtpd_sender_restrictions =
> permit_mynetworks
> check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/valid
El 22/10/2014 a las 19:47, Viktor Dukhovni escribió:
Mail that passes these two conditions is either sent from a client
that matches "permit_mynetworks" (checks logs or Received headers for
client IP) or from an *envelope sender* address that is not blocked
by that table.
Ok, this would explai
Hi,
This weekend a MySQL server which backends a couple of postfix servers went
down for a couple of hours without anyone noticing and I'm looking to setup
some monitoring so that it doesn't go unnoticed again in future.
I thought a good start would be a look though the syslogs for entries wi
steve:
> 1) Is it right that a 'table lookup problem' is only a warning and
> not a critical event? In my setup I would feel it was a critical
> event and I would guess it would be in most peoples setups if
> they've gone to the trouble of using a SQL backend.
That depends on the purpose of the ta
Hi,
Thankyou for taking the time to reply.
All maps on my setup are MySQL backed. I have no local mail as such. All
domains are virtual (I think that's the correct postfix terminology?)
# postconf | grep mysql
debug_peer_list = proxy:mysql:/usr/local/etc/postfix/mysql/debug_peer_list.cf
myn
steve:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Thankyou for taking the time to reply.
>
> All maps on my setup are MySQL backed. I have no local mail as such. All
> domains are virtual (I think that's the correct postfix terminology?)
>
> # postconf | grep mysql
>
[lotsa maps]
> > That depends on the purpose of the
Original Message
Subject: Re: Re-2: Fw: table lookup problems warnings and not critical?
(22-Oct-2014 22:16)
From:wie...@porcupine.org
To: postfix-us...@spectrumcs.net
> steve:
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thankyou for taking the time to reply.
> >
> > All maps on my
On 10/22/2014 2:45 PM, steve wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> This weekend a MySQL server which backends a couple of postfix servers went
> down for a couple of hours without anyone noticing and I'm looking to setup
> some monitoring so that it doesn't go unnoticed again in future.
>
There are really o
To go hand-in-hand with the Postfix support for Internationalized Email,
the new version 2.10.0 of amavisd mail content filter was released
today.
So now that we have it covered at an MTA and at a content filter stages,
it's perhaps time to step up the heat on developers of mail clients
and IMA
Mark Martinec:
> To go hand-in-hand with the Postfix support for Internationalized Email,
> the new version 2.10.0 of amavisd mail content filter was released
> today.
Thanks, Mark.
Wietse
> So now that we have it covered at an MTA and at a content filter stages,
> it's perhaps time to
According to the tutorial you followed you don't need to make a system
user for them to get mail. Just add them to the sql database. The
mailbox location is specified in /etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-mail.conf with
mail_location = /path/to/mailbox
On 10/22/2014 07:41 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Austin E
26 matches
Mail list logo
