Hello,
First, sorry for my english, I try to explain my problem
I had a spam Attack on my postfix relay from my webserver.
A bad script on the webserver send a lot of spam but some goods mails are on
the middle.
I corrected the web site, clean the mailqueue and now, there are 240 good mails
Hi,
postfix removes status message information from a file. mail -s 'stat"
m...@example.com < stat.txt
sends blank message, verified stat.txt file has log information.
this is happening since yesterday, i just reinstalled php, i didn’t make any
changes to postfix configuration.
Pleas
Am 07.08.2014 um 13:22 schrieb Ramesh:
> postfix removes status message information from a file
no it don't
and even if without logs nobody could help
> mail -s 'stat" m...@example.com < stat.txt
> sends blank message, verified stat.txt file has log information.
well try that command in a shel
It appears that Google Gmail is going to continue adding support for RFC
6530. I'm not sure if that implies that they will implement RFC 6531,
but it seems that way.
http://gmailblog.blogspot.nl/2014/08/a-first-step-toward-more-global-email.html
On 30-12-13 18:36, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Wietse:
Oh never mind, just read this message.. ;)
On 06-08-14 13:46, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
> * Wietse Venema [2014-07-15 19:33]:
>> Proudly presenting Postfix SMTPUTF8 support! Below is text from
>> the RELEASE_NOTES file for postfix-2.12-20140715, to be uploaded
>> later today.
>
> Aaand Google h
It is not a problem with quotes, all these days it was working fine, since
yesterday receiving messages without content.
I don't know where went wrong in the server.
Thanks,
Ramesh
On Thursday, 7 August 2014 5:06 PM, "li...@rhsoft.net" wrote:
Am 07.08.2014 um 13:22 schrieb Ramesh:
>
Am 07.08.2014 um 19:23 schrieb Ramesh:
> It is not a problem with quotes, all these days it was working fine,
> since yesterday receiving messages without content.
1. you showed a shell command that had broken quoting,
and apparently from a shell that does not properly complain about mixing
quotes
first:
* don't post in HTML
* don't reply-all on lists
* don't top-post
* provide useful informations - "don't work" is not useful
http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html#beprecise
Am 07.08.2014 um 19:23 schrieb Ramesh:
> It is not a problem with quotes
what you posted has *surely* a
Hello,
I would like to strip received headers and change the helo_name for
outgoing e-mail fone _one_ transport for _one_ recipient domain.
Everything else I want to leave as it is. What is the best way to obtain
that, should I use a second instance with the helo_name and
header_checks in place and
Am 07.08.2014 um 22:27 schrieb Marius Gologan:
> I’m getting a lot of spam from the domains listed below.
>
> Since the list is keep growing, I blocked the associated NS (using
> check_sender_ns_access) which seems an extreme
> measure to me.
>
> Do you have a better suggestion?
* greylisting
Am 07.08.2014 um 22:27 schrieb Marius Gologan:
> List 2: Domains redirecting http traffic to google.com via http redirect, not
> DNS nor IP
who do you think you are?
let google to the same in your direction and look how far you get
As I said, the list is growing with new domains every few minutes:
greylist - not dealing with bots or scripts.
PTR - not helping. Spam must be blocked proactively. Domains, MXs, IPs, PTR
are new with every new domain.
One of the spammer is definitely not stupid (NS: *.ns.cloudflare.com).
-
Someone who investigates and tries own ideas before bothering others.
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] On Behalf Of li...@rhsoft.net
Sent: Thursday, August 7, 2014 11:33 PM
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Spam bloc
redirect *your unwanted traffic* to a not involved 3rd
party is not an idea - it is plain stupid and that is
a polite answer!
Am 07.08.2014 um 22:47 schrieb Marius Gologan:
> Someone who investigates and tries own ideas before bothering others.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-postfix
On 8/7/2014 3:24 PM, Thomas Glanzmann wrote:
> Hello,
> I would like to strip received headers and change the helo_name for
> outgoing e-mail fone _one_ transport for _one_ recipient domain.
> Everything else I want to leave as it is. What is the best way to obtain
> that, should I use a second ins
Those domains belong to the sender/spammer. He is the one redirecting the
traffic via http, not DNS (cname/host) which could gave me an advantage.
Please ignore my request.
Thank you.
Marius.
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
[mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.or
Hello Noel,
> Note: stripping Received: headers is generally considered bad practice
> since it removes important tracking and debug information. Some
> anti-spam engines will penalize mail with no Received: headers.
I don't like it either but I want to hide the originating system.
> Your maste
17 matches
Mail list logo
