Hi Ben,
Certainly not reinventing the wheel.
It's more about classifying the importance of legitimate emails, like
the 'Priority' inbox from google, but open source.
It's common to receive emails from mailing lists without the appropriate
List-Id headers, therefore, recognising these kind of
Wietse and Viktor,
My boss thinks I posted too much detailed information in my original email
during our discussion
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.postfix.user/245050.
Can I edit my original message or withdraw my original message?
Thanks,
Carl
-Original Message-
From: owner-
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 01:30:58PM +, Xie, Wei wrote:
> Wietse and Viktor,
>
> My boss thinks I posted too much detailed information in my original email
> during our discussion
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.mail.postfix.user/245050.
>
> Can I edit my original message or withdraw my o
Can Postfix handle multiple IP addresses with individual certificates without having to start multiple
instances of Postfix?
Thanks all.
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 11:00:18AM -0400, Tech Support Department wrote:
> Can Postfix handle multiple IP addresses with individual certificates
> without having to start multiple instances of Postfix?
In master(5).cf each smtpd(8) service (bound to a particular IP
address) can be configured with
Hi everybody.
I´m receiving some e-mails coming from outside with the FROM pointing to
my local domain. This causes confusion on my antispam tools.
Ex: I received an e-mail from the internet with webmas...@iqm.unicamp.br
(which is my domain) as FROM. How can I make postfix to accept incoming
e-ma
On 04 Aug 2014, at 19:25, Andre Luiz Paiz wrote:
> I´m receiving some e-mails coming from outside with the FROM pointing to my
> local domain. This causes confusion on my antispam tools.
> Ex: I received an e-mail from the internet with webmas...@iqm.unicamp.br
> (which is my domain) as FROM. H
Quoting DTNX Postmaster :
On 04 Aug 2014, at 19:25, Andre Luiz Paiz
wrote:
I´m receiving some e-mails coming from outside with the FROM pointing
to my local domain. This causes confusion on my antispam tools.
Ex: I received an e-mail from the internet with
webmas...@iqm.unicamp.br (which is
why is "access denied" here reported?
smtpd_milters = unix:/run/clamav-milter/clamav-milter.socket
Aug 4 21:14:43 testserver postfix/submission/smtpd[12440]: connect from
local.rhsoft.net[62.178.103.85]
Aug 4 21:14:43 testserver postfix/submission/smtpd[12440]: warning: connect to
Milter serv
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 09:18:27PM +0200, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
> why is "access denied" here reported?
The "/run" directory is on many systems restricted to root.
Your permissions checks start one level lower and are tested
as "root".
> [root@testserver:~]$ stat /run/clamav-milter/
> File:
Maybe Apparmor/SELinux/alike blocking access to /run directory?
Enviado de Samsung Mobile
Mensaje original
De: li...@rhsoft.net
Fecha:04/08/2014 21:18 (GMT+01:00)
Para: Mailing-List postfix
Asunto: service unix:/run/clamav-milter/clamav-milter.socket: Permission
denied
Am 04.08.2014 um 21:49 schrieb Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 09:18:27PM +0200, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
>
>> why is "access denied" here reported?
>
> The "/run" directory is on many systems restricted to root.
> Your permissions checks start one level lower and are tested
> as "root
none of both is enabled
system is booted with selinux=0as kernel-param
Am 04.08.2014 um 22:08 schrieb Nicolás:
> Maybe Apparmor/SELinux/alike blocking access to /run directory?
>
> Mensaje original
> De: li...@rhsoft.net
> Fecha:04/08/2014 21:18 (GMT+01:00)
> Para: Mailing-List
interesting - it needs chmod 0666
MilterSocketMode 0666
interesting because the socket on all of my servers for
mysqld is /var/lib/mysql/mysqld_dbmail.sock and /var/lib/
in fact is mounted as readonly-namespace while postfix,
dovecot and httpd are talking with mysqld over it all the
time
Am 04.08
On 04 Aug 2014, at 20:45, Andre Luiz Paiz wrote:
> Quoting DTNX Postmaster :
>
>> On 04 Aug 2014, at 19:25, Andre Luiz Paiz wrote:
>>
>>> I´m receiving some e-mails coming from outside with the FROM pointing to my
>>> local domain. This causes confusion on my antispam tools.
>>> Ex: I receive
I was told that "The servers hostname and domain name will appear in all the incoming and outgoing email
headers." Why wouldn't this separation of IP addresses and certificates fix that, and is there any way to
solve that part of my privacy problem?
Thanks.
On 08/04/2014 11:09 AM, Viktor Duk
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 04:35:48PM -0400, Tech Support Department wrote:
> I was told that "The servers hostname and domain name will appear in all the
> incoming and outgoing email headers." Why wouldn't this separation of IP
> addresses and certificates fix that, and is there any way to solve th
On 08/04/2014 01:58 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> However, this is generally a waste of
> time, nobody cares what the server's banner or EHLO name says.
I care that EHLO contains something reasonable, or I will reject the
connection. But that's me.
(signed)
Bastard Mail Admin from Hell
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 02:30:50PM -0700, list wrote:
> On 08/04/2014 01:58 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> > However, this is generally a waste of
> > time, nobody cares what the server's banner or EHLO name says.
>
> I care that EHLO contains something reasonable, or I will reject the
> connection.
Am 04.08.2014 um 23:44 schrieb Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 02:30:50PM -0700, list wrote:
>> On 08/04/2014 01:58 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>>> However, this is generally a waste of
>>> time, nobody cares what the server's banner or EHLO name says.
>>
>> I care that EHLO contains so
20 matches
Mail list logo
