Le 16/06/2014 04:02, Viktor Dukhovni a écrit :
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:29:03AM +0900, Akihiro Koike wrote:
>
>> We are a registry operator of new generic top-level domain(gTLD).
>> Therefore we are interested in the impact of new gTLDs.
>> I'd like your thoughts on what kind of impact the appe
I tag it OT, as the comment is on the policy itself.
On Sun 15/Jun/2014 22:11:29 +0200 li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
> Am 15.06.2014 22:01, schrieb Eliezer Croitoru:
>> I Have been reading:
>> http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html
>> http://www.postfix.org/SMTPD_ACCESS_README.html
>> h
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-smtp-with-dane/
"In WG Last Call"
Any estimate on when this might become final Viktor?
After Google named & shamed Comcast for not having starttls, many
well-known services are now establishing RFC 3207 starttls support.
Additionally people are bec
Am 16.06.2014 09:45, schrieb Alessandro Vesely:
> I tag it OT, as the comment is on the policy itself.
>
> On Sun 15/Jun/2014 22:11:29 +0200 li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
>> Am 15.06.2014 22:01, schrieb Eliezer Croitoru:
>>> I Have been reading:
>>> http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.h
Serkan ?zen:
> When I redirect incoming mail that has 3 recipients to my script,
> I see that my script (it reads mail from stdin and creates file
> with the stream coming from stdin.) creates 3 files in total, one
> for each recipient. What I really want is that to create only one
> file.
In that
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:12:03AM +0200, Per Thorsheim wrote:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-smtp-with-dane/
> "In WG Last Call"
>
> Any estimate on when this might become final Viktor?
With any luck, around July IETF. The WG chairs are trying to
coordinate progress on both
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 09:12:18AM +0200, Erwan David wrote:
> I do not know whether there is a email server there, but dk. has a A
> record, thus user@dk might be a valid email address...
Though "technically" valid, it is in practice unusable. Almost
all senders will rewrite this to . Getting
On 16 Jun 2014, at 17:22, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 09:12:18AM +0200, Erwan David wrote:
>
>> I do not know whether there is a email server there, but dk. has a A
>> record, thus user@dk might be a valid email address...
>
> Though "technically" valid, it is in practice u
Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 09:12:18AM +0200, Erwan David wrote:
>
> > I do not know whether there is a email server there, but dk. has a A
> > record, thus user@dk might be a valid email address...
>
> Though "technically" valid, it is in practice unusable. Almost
> all senders w
