transport_maps, custom script and 'too many hops'

2014-05-15 Thread mancyb...@gmail.com
Hi All! I've created a simple PHP script that recognizes mail delivery errors ("Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender") and does a number of things on a database (100% legit traffic I swear, I work for an ISP and hate spam / abuses as much as you do :|) I've added it to transport_maps so it proces

Re: Berkeley DB6 and Postfix

2014-05-15 Thread Robert Sander
On 12.05.2014 08:14, Wietse Venema wrote: > There is no db6 port on my FreeBSD9 laptop, so I'll try to install > one from the future. I remember that Mark Martinec mentioned a license change in Berkeley DB version 6 to the Affero GPL that forces Amavis to switch to LMDB. The additional provision

Delivery problem in 2.12

2014-05-15 Thread Birta Levente
Hi I use postfix 2.12-20140223 with virtual domains and users and dovecot LDA. Now, if I upgrade to 20140508 or 20140406 (I haven't other snapshot downloaded), with all received mails I got warning: process /usr/libexec/postfix/pipe pid 2078 killed by signal 11. I even tried to downgrade and i

ZIP file attachments

2014-05-15 Thread James B. Byrne
Be aware that DMARC reports are always zipped. P.S. I get the digest version of this list. It there a policy reason why all of the digest messages have their Date, From and Subject headers stripped? I ask because I never encountered this situation before and it makes replying to individuals or m

Re: Berkeley DB6 and Postfix

2014-05-15 Thread Mark Martinec
Robert Sander wrote: I remember that Mark Martinec mentioned a license change in Berkeley DB version 6 to the Affero GPL that forces Amavis to switch to LMDB. The additional provision requires that the complete source code be made available to any network user of the AGPL-licensed work https://en

Re: Delivery problem in 2.12

2014-05-15 Thread Wietse Venema
Birta Levente: > Hi > > I use postfix 2.12-20140223 with virtual domains and users and dovecot LDA. > Now, if I upgrade to 20140508 or 20140406 (I haven't other snapshot > downloaded), with all received mails I got warning: process > /usr/libexec/postfix/pipe pid 2078 killed by signal 11. Pleas

[PATCH] Re: Delivery problem in postfix-2.12-20140316 -- 20140508

2014-05-15 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 03:32:22PM +0300, Birta Levente wrote: > with all received mails I got warning: process > /usr/libexec/postfix/pipe pid 2078 killed by signal 11. diff --git a/src/pipe/pipe.c b/src/pipe/pipe.c index d63aca8..954fecf 100644 --- a/src/pipe/pipe.c +++ b/src/pipe/pipe.c @@ -13

Re: Berkeley DB6 and Postfix

2014-05-15 Thread Quanah Gibson-Mount
--On May 15, 2014 at 4:31:05 PM +0200 Mark Martinec wrote: Robert Sander wrote: I remember that Mark Martinec mentioned a license change in Berkeley DB version 6 to the Affero GPL that forces Amavis to switch to LMDB. The additional provision requires that the complete source code be made

Re: Logging TLS info as part of mail transactions

2014-05-15 Thread Andreas Schulze
Hello Wietse, as promised, I like to reply to this question ... Viktor Dukhovni: For an SMTP client per-record log entry I'd suggest a very condensed format: smtp[pid]: QUEUE-ID: to=, [orig_to=,] [security=none|passive|active,] in which "passive" prot

Re: Berkeley DB6 and Postfix

2014-05-15 Thread Jerry
On Thu, 15 May 2014 09:47:37 -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount stated: >--On May 15, 2014 at 4:31:05 PM +0200 Mark Martinec > wrote: > >> Robert Sander wrote: >>> I remember that Mark Martinec mentioned a license change in Berkeley DB >>> version 6 to the Affero GPL that forces Amavis to switch to LMDB.

Re: Whitelisting individual addresses with postscreen

2014-05-15 Thread /dev/rob0
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 11:35:59AM -0400, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote: > On Wed, 14 May 2014 10:09:19 -0500 > Noel Jones wrote: > > On 5/14/2014 9:59 AM, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote: > > > It looks like hotmail is on two DNSBLs and postscreen is > > > blocking them. I would like to offer my users a way to

Re: If you specify $myorigin, isn't that supposed to be appended to unqualified recipients?

2014-05-15 Thread /dev/rob0
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 05:27:26PM -0500, deoren wrote: > On 2014-05-13 14:46, /dev/rob0 wrote: > >On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 02:15:48PM -0500, deoren wrote: > >>If I send an email to 'root' and $myorgin is set to $mydomain > >>(which is also set properly), shouldn't 'root' be qualified as > >>root@$m

nobody@localhost: Sender address rejected: need fully-qualified address

2014-05-15 Thread Ian Evans
Noticed a few of these in my logs: May 15 23:22:51 carson postfix/smtpd[6768]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from localhost[127.0.0.1]: 504 5.5.2 : Sender address rejected: need fully-qualified address; from= to= proto=ESMTP helo= I'm assuming this is some daemon or something trying to send some report/n

Re: nobody@localhost: Sender address rejected: need fully-qualified address

2014-05-15 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:32:33PM -0400, Ian Evans wrote: > Noticed a few of these in my logs: > > May 15 23:22:51 carson postfix/smtpd[6768]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from > localhost[127.0.0.1]: 504 5.5.2 : Sender address > rejected: need fully-qualified address; from= > to= proto=ESMTP helo= >

Re: nobody@localhost: Sender address rejected: need fully-qualified address

2014-05-15 Thread Ian Evans
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:32 PM, Ian Evans wrote: > Noticed a few of these in my logs: > > May 15 23:22:51 carson postfix/smtpd[6768]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from > localhost[127.0.0.1]: 504 5.5.2 : Sender address > rejected: need fully-qualified address; from= > to= proto=ESMTP helo= > > I'm ass

Re: Berkeley DB6 and Postfix

2014-05-15 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 12.05.2014 00:18, schrieb Jerry: > I have been using Postfix on an old FreeBSD server for years without > problems. I just updated to a new machine and installed the latest version > of FreeBSD along with Berkeley DB6. I wanted to install the newest version > of Postfix available in the ports sy

Re: Berkeley DB6 and Postfix

2014-05-15 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 16.05.2014 01:27, schrieb Jerry: > Using version 6 on a FreeBSD machine is not really a necessity anyway. All I > wanted to do was eliminate having multiple version numbers of the same > program on my machine. In any case, unless the FreeBSD port maintainer > chooses to modify the Postfix port

Re: [PATCH] Re: Delivery problem in postfix-2.12-20140316 -- 20140508

2014-05-15 Thread Birta Levente
On 15/05/2014 18:17, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 03:32:22PM +0300, Birta Levente wrote: with all received mails I got warning: process /usr/libexec/postfix/pipe pid 2078 killed by signal 11. diff --git a/src/pipe/pipe.c b/src/pipe/pipe.c index d63aca8..954fecf 100644 --- a/s