I am submitting the attached code (patches to some existing files and
two new files: dict_odbc.c and dict_odbc.h) which adds support for a new
dictionary type that uses unixODBC (www.unixodbc.org).
As noted in the past on this list, that could be useful in supporting
map types that don't have nati
On 25.04.2014 17:00, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> If anyone else on this list has a DNSSEC signed domain and adds MX
> host TLSA records, please feel free to drop me a note. I'll connect
> to your domain from my home network a few times a year to test DANE
> interoperability, you will not be exposed t
Hello,
I have been searching if SMTP protocol supports limiting the number of
recipients an MTA will accept and if there is any way to implement such a
setup in postix, but couldn't find a definitive answer. What I mean is
telling the other side not to send more than one rcpt, just like
default_de
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 03:00:42PM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> If anyone else on this list has a DNSSEC signed domain and adds
> MX host TLSA records, please feel free to drop me a note.
You helped me with that in this very thread back in December. :)
Those records are in place now for nodns4.
Forgot to mention:
Need to add some parameters to the make Makefiles command, namely HAS_ODBC and
the linking of the library with -lodbc, assuming the include files are in a
standard location.
make -f Makefile.init makefiles \
'CCARGS=-DHAS_ODBC
'AUXLIBS= -lodbc '
Hello,
Many thanks to all who replied.
Many suggestion are really helpful and we have been able to stop the
spammers for now.
Best regards
--
Marcin Szymonik
szymoni...@gmail.com
Mehmet Tolga Avcioglu:
> Hello,
>
> I have been searching if SMTP protocol supports limiting the number of
> recipients an MTA will accept [...] but couldn't find a definitive answer.
RFC 5321 defines the SMTP protocol. This requires that the server
can receive at least 100 recipients. This docum
Hello!
I’m running Postfix 2.11.0,1 on FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE-p1 inside of a jail.
The jail is bound to an alias of the hosts loopback interface lo0.
I stumbled onto this error message while sifting through /var/log/maillog:
Apr 13 03:01:06 mail postfix/smtp[22641]: 4F6CD41BB: to=,
relay=none, dela
Sebastian:
> Hello!
> I?m running Postfix 2.11.0,1 on FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE-p1 inside of a jail.
> The jail is bound to an alias of the hosts loopback interface lo0.
>
> I stumbled onto this error message while sifting through /var/log/maillog:
>
> Apr 13 03:01:06 mail postfix/smtp[22641]: 4F6CD41
*Hi folks !*
I have a small problem with my postfix configuration.
I'm trying to enable both SSL and TLS support and disable plain auth,
however i can only make one of them work at the same time.
If i enable SSL than TLS stops working, if i enable TLS, SSL stops working.
(the error i receive in ou
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 07:23:38AM -0700, vicafk wrote:
> I have a small problem with my postfix configuration.
> I'm trying to enable both SSL and TLS support and disable plain auth,
> however i can only make one of them work at the same time.
You're using dumbed-down MUA terminology. In mail c
Well, I tried this :
25 inet n - n - - smtpd -o smtpd_enforce_tls=yes -o
smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes -o
smtpd_client_restrictions=permit_sasl_authenticated,permit_mynetworks,check_
relay_domains,reject_unauth_destination,reject
587 inet n - n - - smtpd -o smtpd_enforce_tls=yes -o
smtpd_tls_security
Am 26.04.2014 18:04, schrieb Victor Faur:
> 25 inet n - n - - smtpd -o smtpd_enforce_tls=yes -o
> smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes -o
> smtpd_client_restrictions=permit_sasl_authenticated,permit_mynetworks,check_
> relay_domains,reject_unauth_destination,reject
> 587 inet n - n - - smtpd -o smtpd_enfor
why do you reply off-list and top-posting?
Am 26.04.2014 18:32, schrieb Victor Faur:
> Ok, I get it now. I left the wrapper on port 587 and used starttls on 465, I
> had no idea that the two don't mix
that's why you should start with reading the manuals before acting
> (ps, for port 25 I just co
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 06:40:02PM +0200, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
> Am 26.04.2014 18:32, schrieb Victor Faur:
> > Ok, I get it now. I left the wrapper on port 587 and used starttls on 465, I
> > had no idea that the two don't mix
That's backwards. Wrappermode should be off with port 587 and on
w
On 24/04/14 16:50, Wietse Venema wrote:
> List:
>> On 4/23/14, 3:24 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>> List:
Are there any plans or existing projects that support connecting Postfix
to a Cassandra cluster to execute CQL queries for table lookups? Or any
other NoSQL databases?
>>> If someo
Wietse:
> Typically, this means chroot is enabled on in master.cf but you
> don’t have the required files under /var/spool/postfix.
I checked my master.cf for this and as per default, none of my processes
runs chrooted.
> Please show how you tested name resolution from inside a jail.
> Use the "s
Sebastian:
[ Charset windows-1252 unsupported, converting... ]
> Wietse:
> > Typically, this means chroot is enabled on in master.cf but you
> > don?t have the required files under /var/spool/postfix.
>
> I checked my master.cf for this and as per default, none of my processes
> runs chrooted.
Pl
Wietse Venema:
> RFC 5321 defines the SMTP protocol. This requires that the server
> can receive at least 100 recipients. This document is available at
> no cost beyond that of a network connection. You should read it.
Thank you for the information. I usually do search for those before going
to
Am 27.04.2014 00:01, schrieb Mehmet Tolga Avcioglu:
> Wietse Venema:
>
> RFC 5321 defines the SMTP protocol. This requires that the server
> can receive at least 100 recipients. This document is available at
> no cost beyond that of a network connection. You should read it.
>
> Than
Mehmet Tolga Avcioglu:
> Wietse Venema:
>
> > RFC 5321 defines the SMTP protocol. This requires that the server
> > can receive at least 100 recipients. This document is available at
> > no cost beyond that of a network connection. You should read it.
>
> Thank you for the information. I usually
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 1:13 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Thank you for the information. I usually do search for those before going
> > to the lists, but googling "smtp rfc" didn't reveal the right one easily.
>
> When I type 'smtp rfc' into a google search window it suggests
> the following quer
Hi,
I have an email gateway that filters spam for third-parties.
I usually use fail2ban to reduce cases when particular IPs are flooding the
gateway and record Hits: 35-100 points, by injecting "SMTP REJECT/DEFER
explicit" to reduce the queue on the sender's side, help the exploited
ISP/ESP
Marius Gologan:
> Can I add, in any way, the sender ip on the postfix/smtp log line?
No.
You can extract the SMTP client IP address from Postfix logging
with the same queue ID. This works best when you enable long queue
IDs that never repeat.
# postconf -e "enable_long_queue_ids = yes"
Wietse Venema:
> Marius Gologan:
> > Can I add, in any way, the sender ip on the postfix/smtp log line?
>
> No.
>
> You can extract the SMTP client IP address from Postfix logging
> with the same queue ID. This works best when you enable long queue
> IDs that never repeat.
>
> # postconf -e
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 08:50:49PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Wietse Venema:
> > Marius Gologan:
> > > Can I add, in any way, the sender ip on the postfix/smtp
> > > log line?
> >
> > No.
> >
> > You can extract the SMTP client IP address from Postfix
> > logging with the same queue ID. This
I made a test (log below). The warning header appears in "cleanup" log line.
Not in the same line with the smtp client log, with Exchange rejection.
Apr 27 03:14:03 gateway postfix/cleanup[10319]: 76D2343520: warning: header
X-SMTP-Client-Addr: ip.add.re.ss from host.s-domain.com[ip.add.re.ss];
fr
27 matches
Mail list logo
