First off I apologize if this message is delivered twice: The
first version I sent doesn't appear to have reached the list.
-
Dear list,
this is a follow-up on the interoperability issues between
Windows 2003 servers and OpenSSL ver
It sounds as if you want something like SPF and a policy daemon. Just
google it.
Hi,
I run a moderately busy mail server (postfix + dovecot + amavis).
Every day, during peak times (around 10am to 2pm), we see delays in
the delivery of mail (both incoming and outgoing) of around 5 to 10
minutes. I appreciate this isn't a big delay, but I'm getting
frustrated trying to figure ou
Peter Smith:
> Amavis + SpamAssassin + ClamAV are being used for scanning mail
> (incoming only). Again, this would be a likely source of delay, but
> amavis never reaches its max connections (we typically only see half
> this figure). I've also enabled verbose logging in amavis, and it
> never tak
Hi,
I have an issue with the postfix vacation responder that makes no sense to
me and since I'm not a mail expert, I'm hoping this might make sense to
somebody.
We are using postfix 2.5.9, postfix admin 2.3.2 .
My boss was going on vacation so I setup the "set vacation" message while
she was awa
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 09:24:39AM +0200, Philipp Gesang wrote:
> The system was patched appropriately and capable of making 3DES
> connections. It did, however fail to accept connections without
> tweaking due to the multitude of additional cipher suites
> available in OpenSSL 1.0.1g.
Were the p
-<| Quoting Viktor Dukhovni , on Thursday,
2014-04-24 13:15:54 |>-
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 09:24:39AM +0200, Philipp Gesang wrote:
>
> > The system was patched appropriately and capable of making 3DES
> > connections. It did, however fail to accept connections without
> > tweaking due to the m
People use phones with our e-mail setup. ( There are only a few
dinosaurs using a desktop for communication).
On 23/04/2014 11:14 PM, John Griessen wrote:
On 04/23/2014 08:30 PM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
If you are using Postfix, you will find the recipes in "The Book of
Postfix" which is worth b
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 04:05:54PM +0200, Philipp Gesang wrote:
> > Were the patches in question for Exchange 2003 or for Microsoft's
> > Schannel SSL/TLS library?
>
> According to the client the entire system was on the latest
> patchlevel. I'm afraid I can't be more specific than that.
That's
On 4/23/14, 3:24 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
List:
Are there any plans or existing projects that support connecting Postfix
to a Cassandra cluster to execute CQL queries for table lookups? Or any
other NoSQL databases?
If someone has a plan, then they are welcome to implement it!
For a simple ex
List:
> On 4/23/14, 3:24 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > List:
> >> Are there any plans or existing projects that support connecting Postfix
> >> to a Cassandra cluster to execute CQL queries for table lookups? Or any
> >> other NoSQL databases?
> > If someone has a plan, then they are welcome to imp
On 23/04/2014 7:43 PM, John Griessen wrote:
On 04/23/2014 04:07 PM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
Another approach to reduce SPAM would be to use fail2ban for a
"reasonable" period to shut out IP addresses for a "reasonable"
period that are sending a "lot" of SPAM in a "short" period.
Hi,
Are you mean
On 4/24/2014 7:31 AM, Charles Richard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have an issue with the postfix vacation responder that makes no
> sense to me and since I'm not a mail expert, I'm hoping this might
> make sense to somebody.
>
> We are using postfix 2.5.9, postfix admin 2.3.2 .
>
> My boss was going on v
Hi. Long time user of postfix here wanting to discuss Anvil.
In IPv4, the max number of sessions per remote site is pretty much
limited by the scarcity of IPv4 together with 65535 source port numbers.
So individual remote sites were limited in what they could do by the
underlying infrastructur
Ray Hunter:
> Can Anvil store enough state to be able to track (and filter) a DoS
> attack or resource depletion attack from an individual IPv6 site, whilst
> still being able to provide service to other remote sites, and not
> hogging the host machines resources entirely?
Anvil currently does
Am 24.04.2014 20:40, schrieb Ray Hunter:
> The parameters would be:
> single attacker with access to a few /64's or /48's of address space.
> Not trying to fend off a distributed million-node botnet.
> mail server with 100Mbps full-duplex Internet connection = 5
> sessions per second approx (10
I was looking for a way to skip the content_filter for connections to
localhost. Looking at http://www.postfix.org/FILTER_README.html I found
that the only way was to configure each interface in the master.cf
file. So what I had was the following line in my main.cf
content_filter = smtp-amavis:[
On 4/24/2014 8:21 PM, Tim Hogan wrote:
> I was looking for a way to skip the content_filter for connections to
> localhost. Looking at http://www.postfix.org/FILTER_README.html I found
> that the only way was to configure each interface in the master.cf
> file. So what I had was the following lin
18 matches
Mail list logo
