On 4/12/2014 3:03 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
> but on the other what is that hard to have HELO/PTR/A matching?
This has been asked and answered multiple times on this list. The short
answer is that customers of some ISPs do not have control of rDNS. For
a more thorough discussion of this topic
Am 13.04.2014 10:34, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
> On 4/12/2014 3:03 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
>
>> but on the other what is that hard to have HELO/PTR/A matching?
>
> This has been asked and answered multiple times on this list. The short
> answer is that customers of some ISPs do not have contro
OK, nobody has anything to say on this?
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 1:13 AM, Thijssen wrote:
> We decided to create a special MX for just the bulk mailings within
> our IP-block, the datacentre network we maintain. Here's where my
> questions arise:
>
> The setup is as follows:
> - We have many serv
Am 13.04.2014 10:34, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
> On 4/12/2014 3:03 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
>
>> but on the other what is that hard to have HELO/PTR/A matching?
>
> This has been asked and answered multiple times on this list. The short
> answer is that customers of some ISPs do not have control
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 03:26:43PM +0200, Thijssen wrote:
> OK, nobody has anything to say on this?
The post contained a lot of misunderstanding, and it is difficult to
know where to begin, but I'll make at least an initial try.
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 1:13 AM, Thijssen wrote:
>
> > We decid
Thijssen:
> OK, nobody has anything to say on this?
>
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 1:13 AM, Thijssen wrote:
>
> > We decided to create a special MX for just the bulk mailings within
> > our IP-block, the datacentre network we maintain. Here's where my
> > questions arise:
> >
> > The setup is as fo
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 6:41 PM, alanef wrote:
> Many Thanks, I would like to add postscreen but it seems that is only
> available from 2.8.
>
> Currently I am on 2.6.6 (on Centos 6.5) and am struggling to find any
> repository with 2.8+ or and how-tos on upgrading. I'll keep looking.
>
>
Try Ce
On 12 Apr 2014, at 19:39, Rick Zeman wrote:
It's
an Apple server so it uses its own "goto fail" TLS library, and only
has an older version of openssl (0.9.8y) on it so I'm safe--from this,
at least.
Not even wrong. :)
The "goto fail" bug was in Apple's own TLS implementation named "Secure
Tr
When a user sends too many messages to bad addresses, it’s probably a spammer
using a compromised account. Other than a very messy reading and parsing of
the log files, is there a way to get postfix to tell me when a message has
bounced and who the sender was (perhaps a hook in the main.cf or s
Rob Tanner:
> When a user sends too many messages to bad addresses, it?s probably
> a spammer using a compromised account. Other than a very messy
> reading and parsing of the log files, is there a way to get postfix
> to tell me when a message has bounced and who the sender was
> (perhaps a hook
Hi. I set up an nginx imap/smtp proxy. I can see in the logs something
about the proxy not being able to send mail.
Apr 13 17:31:43 ns1 postfix/smtps/smtpd[29529]: warning: hostname
host.domain.com does not resolve to address 12.34.56.78: Name or service
not known
Apr 13 17:31:43 ns1 postfix/smtps
Hi. I set up an nginx imap/smtp proxy. I can see in the logs something about
the proxy not being able to send mail.
Apr 13 17:31:43 ns1 postfix/smtps/smtpd[29529]: warning: hostname
host.domain.com does not resolve to address 12.34.56.78: Name or service not
known
Apr 13 17:31:43 ns1 postfix/smtps
On 4/13/2014 8:38 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Am 13.04.2014 10:34, schrieb Stan Hoeppner:
>> On 4/12/2014 3:03 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
>>
>>> but on the other what is that hard to have HELO/PTR/A matching?
>>
>> This has been asked and answered multiple times on this list. The short
>> answ
On 04/12/2014 03:07 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Hi , anyone knows this rbl ?
>
> http://v4bl.org/about.html
My experience with them isn't very good. They brag about the large
number of IPs they have and keep adding to the list, but for a DNSRBL
quality is much more important than quantity. I
15 matches
Mail list logo
