Hello,
I am using the recipient_canonical_maps as PCRE map in order to convert some
recipient e-mail addresses. I have it configured like this in my main.cf:
recipient_canonical_maps = pcre:/etc/postfix/recipient_canonical_domains
and use the following single entry:
/^newsletter(-.+)?@d
On 12.03.2014 18:16, Pete wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 05:28:38PM +0530, tejas sarade wrote:
>>
>>No. Not the hostname that client pretends, I am talking about valid DNS A
>>record throuch DNS lookup.
>>
>>I just want to creat and access control system where I will provide the
>>
On 3/13/2014 5:33 AM, ML mail wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using the recipient_canonical_maps as PCRE map in order to
> convert some recipient e-mail addresses. I have it configured like
> this in my main.cf:
>
> recipient_canonical_maps=
> pcre:/etc/postfix/recipient_canonical_domains
>
> a
Hi Noel,
That makes sense, thanks for your help.
I have now adapted the PCRE map with the following entry instead:
if /^newsletter(-.+)?@domain.com$/
newsletter-domaincom$1...@domain.com
endif
but it must be wrong as I get:
warning: pcre map /etc/postfix/recipient_canonical_domains, line 2: ign
Hi Sahil,
Thank you for the suggestion. I have ran "postfix set-permissions", but it
looks like the postdrop warning is still occurring on each message.
Thanks,
Joey
--
View this message in context:
http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/20-40-second-delays-Is-this-normal-tp65951p65964.html
Se
On 3/13/2014 6:48 AM, ML mail wrote:
> Hi Noel,
>
> That makes sense, thanks for your help.
>
> I have now adapted the PCRE map with the following entry instead:
>
> if /^newsletter(-.+)?@domain.com$/
> newsletter-domaincom$1...@domain.com
> endif
>
> but it must be wrong as I get:
> warning: p
Hi all, I need an advice about my mx-backup server
main mail server has many antispam system (amavis, spamassassin, etc.),
when an email bounced by these antispam, the email goes to mx-backup
server. mx-backup server keep email inside own queue.
So, do I need install amavis and other antispam sys
Am 13.03.2014 14:42, schrieb Pol Hallen:
> Hi all, I need an advice about my mx-backup server
>
> main mail server has many antispam system (amavis, spamassassin, etc.),
> when an email bounced by these antispam, the email goes to mx-backup
> server. mx-backup server keep email inside own queue.
Am 13.03.2014 14:46, schrieb li...@rhsoft.net:
> Am 13.03.2014 14:42, schrieb Pol Hallen:
>> Hi all, I need an advice about my mx-backup server
>>
>> main mail server has many antispam system (amavis, spamassassin, etc.),
>> when an email bounced by these antispam, the email goes to mx-backup
>> s
On 3/13/2014 8:42 AM, Pol Hallen wrote:
> Hi all, I need an advice about my mx-backup server
>
> main mail server has many antispam system (amavis, spamassassin, etc.),
> when an email bounced by these antispam, the email goes to mx-backup
> server. mx-backup server keep email inside own queue.
>
Greetings, All!
At this moment, I have a working prototype of our organization's mail server,
but I'm lacking some final touches on it, and would like to have some advice.
The server suite consists of
postfix
dovecot
PAM auth
OpenLDAP backend behind that one.
amavisd-new with it's own suite of
> There's evidence that some spammers reverse-sort MX records,
> intentionally sending to the backup MX first. Consequently, the
> backup MX /must/ have anti-spam controls identical to the primary.
>
> But consider if you truly need a backup MX. Most folks have dropped
> them because they're spam
Am 13.03.2014 21:08, schrieb Pol Hallen:
>> There's evidence that some spammers reverse-sort MX records,
>> intentionally sending to the backup MX first. Consequently, the
>> backup MX /must/ have anti-spam controls identical to the primary.
>>
>> But consider if you truly need a backup MX. Most
On 3/13/2014 3:08 PM, Pol Hallen wrote:
>
>> There's evidence that some spammers reverse-sort MX records,
>> intentionally sending to the backup MX first. Consequently, the
>> backup MX /must/ have anti-spam controls identical to the primary.
>>
>> But consider if you truly need a backup MX. Most
On 3/13/2014 2:43 PM, Andrey Repin wrote:
> Greetings, All!
>
> At this moment, I have a working prototype of our organization's mail server,
> but I'm lacking some final touches on it, and would like to have some advice.
>
> The server suite consists of
>
> postfix
> dovecot
> PAM auth
> OpenLD
I originally had a setup that was
postfix -lmtp:unix-socket-> dovecot
but to improve my setup I changed it to be
postfix -lmtp:unix-socket->dspam->dovecot
However there is one downside to that approach - I copy messages for my
self (and other accounts) back to alan+save...@chandlerfamily.org.
Greetings, Noel Jones!
Thank you for the reply, Noel.
I'm not seeing my own message sent to the list, is this normal?
>> At this moment, I have a working prototype of our organization's mail server,
>> but I'm lacking some final touches on it, and would like to have some advice.
>>
>> The server
On 3/13/2014 4:45 PM, Andrey Repin wrote:
> Greetings, Noel Jones!
>
> Thank you for the reply, Noel.
> I'm not seeing my own message sent to the list, is this normal?
Maybe the amavis-users list server is filtering your mail. I don't
recall seeing any from you either.
Note some mail systems, no
On Thu, 2014-03-13 at 06:26:10 -0700, jmct wrote:
> Thank you for the suggestion. I have ran "postfix set-permissions",
Was there any output? Did you run this command with superuser
priveledges?
> but it looks like the postdrop warning is still occurring on each
> message.
What, if anything, is
19 matches
Mail list logo
