Hi,
I've been getting the below messages for quite some time now, and I
also get them on postqueue -p. What can I do about it?
When I look at postqueue -p, the ID is 44C5E220E91 and when I do a grep, I get
44C5E220E91: to=,
relay=alt1.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[173.194.70.27]:25, delay=96931,
de
Hi,
> [...] The user you are trying to contact is receiving mail at a rate
> that prevents additional messages from being delivered. [...]
I do not see what's so unclear about that?
Google thinks that the recipient receives an unusual amount of mail.
It's either the recipient's or Google's fault
Muzaffer Tolga Ozses:
> Hi,
>
> I've been getting the below messages for quite some time now, and I
> also get them on postqueue -p. What can I do about it?
>
> When I look at postqueue -p, the ID is 44C5E220E91 and when I do a grep, I get
...
> The google search and the above link says it's on g
18.12.2013 15:03, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
I've tryig to use after-queue content filter as described in FILTER_README.
How could I pass the authentication information (i.e. was initial
message sent by authenticated user or not) when re-injecting message
using sendmail? The problem is that further
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 04:54:02PM +0400, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
> 18.12.2013 15:03, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
> >I've tryig to use after-queue content filter as described in
> >FILTER_README.
I'd recommend that you take a look at amavisd-new.
> >How could I pass the authentication information (i.e
On these days where theft of credentials of legitimate e-mail server users
in order to send spam checking the MAIL FROM: using
smtpd_reject_unlisted_sender would be a helping Postfix feature.
Perhaps it is a misunderstanding from my side about the actual meaning of
parameter smtpd_reject_unlisted_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 20-12-13 20:54, Bernardo Pons wrote:
> On these days where theft of credentials of legitimate e-mail
> server users in order to send spam checking the MAIL FROM: using
> smtpd_reject_unlisted_sender would be a helping Postfix feature.
>
> Perhap
Bernardo Pons:
> On these days where theft of credentials of legitimate e-mail server users
> in order to send spam checking the MAIL FROM: using
> smtpd_reject_unlisted_sender would be a helping Postfix feature.
>
> Perhaps it is a misunderstanding from my side about the actual meaning of
> param