Hi,
I have a virtual_alias_maps with a pcre entry like
/^(info|contact|etc)@/ localuser
and it delivers i...@anydomain.com to localuser even though
'anydomain.com' is not in virtual_alias_domains, is that normal?
* Louis-David Mitterrand :
> Hi,
>
> I have a virtual_alias_maps with a pcre entry like
>
> /^(info|contact|etc)@/ localuser
>
> and it delivers i...@anydomain.com to localuser even though
> 'anydomain.com' is not in virtual_alias_domains, is that normal?
Yes.
--
[*] sys4 AG
http://s
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:42:07AM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Louis-David Mitterrand :
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a virtual_alias_maps with a pcre entry like
> >
> > /^(info|contact|etc)@/ localuser
> >
> > and it delivers i...@anydomain.com to localuser even though
> > 'anydomain.com'
On 10/23/2013 10:57 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
[snip]
The problem turns out to be that RedHat's patch did not prune the
list of curves advertised by the TLS client! They're going to
update the code to only advertise secp{256,384}r1, which will make
connections to gmx.de work again (but without E
Am 24.10.2013 11:11, schrieb Patrick Lists:
> On 10/23/2013 10:57 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> [snip]
>> The problem turns out to be that RedHat's patch did not prune the
>> list of curves advertised by the TLS client! They're going to
>> update the code to only advertise secp{256,384}r1, which w
On 10/24/2013 11:15 AM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
Am 24.10.2013 11:11, schrieb Patrick Lists:
On 10/23/2013 10:57 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
[snip]
The problem turns out to be that RedHat's patch did not prune the
list of curves advertised by the TLS client! They're going to
update the code to
* Louis-David Mitterrand :
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:42:07AM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > * Louis-David Mitterrand :
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have a virtual_alias_maps with a pcre entry like
> > >
> > > /^(info|contact|etc)@/ localuser
> > >
> > > and it delivers i...@anydomain.com t
Roland de Lepper:
> Hi ,
>
> The connection between Postfix and the archive is over SMTP.
>
> In my example with the smtpd_milter, will the email also go to the hold
> queue if only one archive connection is down?
That depends on how the archive receive its mail. Does POSTFIX
send the mail to th
Louis-David Mitterrand:
> Hi,
>
> I have a virtual_alias_maps with a pcre entry like
>
> /^(info|contact|etc)@/ localuser
>
> and it delivers i...@anydomain.com to localuser even though
> 'anydomain.com' is not in virtual_alias_domains, is that normal?
RTFM:
NAME
virtual - Postf
Dominik George wrote:
> if i would be you i would *not* use "v=spf1 mx ~all"
> here you go for ipv6
>
> > http://www.openspf.org/SPF_Record_Syntax#ip6
>
> Jeez, I don't believe it. The problem is that the mx mechanism simply
> only enumerates A records of MXs. That's broken ...
Wietse wrote:
> Tha
Roland de Lepper:
> The connection between Postfix and the archive is over SMTP.
>
> In my example with the smtpd_milter, will the email also go to the hold
> queue if only one archive connection is down?
Wietse:
> That depends on how the archive receive its mail. Does POSTFIX
> send the mail to t
On 10/24/2013 08:39 AM, Roland de Lepper wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> The connection between Postfix and the archive is over SMTP.
>
> In my example with the smtpd_milter, will the email also go to the hold
> queue if only one archive connection is down?
> Or will it deliver the email to the archive which i
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 07:59:46AM +0200, Tobias Reckhard wrote:
> > Support for public key fingerprints was added in Postfix 2.9, ...
>
> This is stated at the beginning of the section dealing with
> fingerprints. Further down, where the actual openssl commands are noted,
> there is no such not
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:49:43AM +0200, Louis-David Mitterrand
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:42:07AM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > * Louis-David Mitterrand
> > :
> > > I have a virtual_alias_maps with a pcre entry like
> > >
> > > /^(info|contact|etc)@/ localuser
> > >
> > >
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:00:00AM -0500, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> > Is there a better way?
>
> Nested, if/endif:
>
> if /@example\.(com|net|org)$/
> /^(info|contact|etc)@ localuser@mydestination.domain
> endif
This is all silly, the list of virtual alias domains is known, use
a Makefile to g
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:00:00AM -0500, /dev/rob0 forgot to
terminate a PCRE expression:
> if /@example\.(com|net|org)$/
> /^(info|contact|etc)@ localuser@mydestination.domain
> endif
if /@example\.(com|net|org)$/
/^(info|contact|etc)@/ localuser@mydestination.domain
endif
--
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:04:08AM -0500, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:00:00AM -0500, /dev/rob0 forgot to
> terminate a PCRE expression:
> > if /@example\.(com|net|org)$/
> > /^(info|contact|etc)@ localuser@mydestination.domain
> > endif
>
> if /@example\.(com|net|or
Hello
Continuing on my "secured" email server graal I would like to test SMTP +
TLS exchange of emails
the volume will be very low for testing purpose only and I will be the only
user when I will suceeded to setup my server :-)
My eternal gratitude If anyone knows such server that could be used
* BONNET, Frank [2013-10-24 17:54]:
> Hello
>
> Continuing on my "secured" email server graal I would like to test SMTP +
> TLS exchange of emails
>
> the volume will be very low for testing purpose only and I will be the only
> user when I will suceeded to setup my server :-)
>
> My eternal gr
ok thanks for the tips
Envoyé de mon iPhone.
Le 24 oct. 2013 à 18:02, Sebastian Wiesinger
a écrit :
> * BONNET, Frank [2013-10-24 17:54]:
>> Hello
>>
>> Continuing on my "secured" email server graal I would like to test SMTP +
>> TLS exchange of emails
>>
>> the volume will be very low for te
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Roland,
My proposed solution was a milter that runs locally on the postfix
box, and communicates with both archive boxes so the milter is able to
act on errors in both archive boxes. I did some reading on the
product, and it seems that the milter
On 2013.10.22 09.56, Noel Jones wrote:
On 10/22/2013 8:41 AM, btb wrote:
On 2013.10.21 17.54, Noel Jones wrote:
On 10/21/2013 3:53 PM, btb wrote:
i have a scenario in which certain email is sent using envelope
senders that contain host names that are known only on the local
lan/network, and un
On 24 Oct 2013, at 04:39 , Wietse Venema wrote:
> Louis-David Mitterrand:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a virtual_alias_maps with a pcre entry like
>>
>> /^(info|contact|etc)@/ localuser
>>
>> and it delivers i...@anydomain.com to localuser even though
>> 'anydomain.com' is not in virtual_alias_
On 10/24/2013 2:47 PM, btb wrote:
> On 2013.10.22 09.56, Noel Jones wrote:
>> On 10/22/2013 8:41 AM, btb wrote:
>>> On 2013.10.21 17.54, Noel Jones wrote:
On 10/21/2013 3:53 PM, btb wrote:
> i have a scenario in which certain email is sent using envelope
> senders that contain host nam
Hello,
I'm not tring to do virtual domains. Just trying to get it to work with just
one domain. This time, I used this guide:
https://help.ubuntu.com/12.04/serverguide/postfix.html
I can telnet to my machine just fine on port 25.
I tried to send an e-mail from my address on mail.com to my own
On 10/24/2013 11:20 PM, LuKreme wrote:
On 24 Oct 2013, at 04:39 , Wietse Venema wrote:
Louis-David Mitterrand:
Hi,
I have a virtual_alias_maps with a pcre entry like
/^(info|contact|etc)@/ localuser
and it delivers i...@anydomain.com to localuser even though
'anydomain.com' is not
Am 25.10.2013 00:50, schrieb Tim Legg:
> I tried to send an e-mail from my address on mail.com to my own machine to
> test it out. It bounced. Below is the
> tail of my mail.log
>
> postfix/smtpd[12344]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from mout.gmx.net[74.208.4.201]:
> 554 5.7.1 : Relay
> access deni
Tim Legg:
> postfix/smtpd[12344]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
> mout.gmx.net[74.208.4.201]: 554 5.7.1 : Relay
> access denied; from= to=
> proto=ESMTP helo=
> postfix/smtpd[12344]: disconnect from mout.gmx.net[74.208.4.201]
>
> I read about this error on other forums, but I had no idea what
> they
28 matches
Mail list logo
