Antonio Tommasi:
> Hi to all
> i've postfix 2.9.3 on ubuntu server with sasl+pam authentication to send
> email.
> I've a mysql backhand to store users password.
> In this table i've a field that i use to prevent spam set to value
> 'Y' or 'N' to permit a user to send (Y value) or not to send (N
>
Hello list,
I need to put a SMTP relay between Internet and my company's mx (which
stores inboxes), in order to do some processing.
Current situation is that the mx receives messages directly from the
Internet, without hops inbetween; on the mx, postfix is configured to
retrieve allowed recipi
On Mon, 2 Sep 2013 22:14:42 +
Viktor Dukhovni articulated:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 03:03:36AM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 01:25:02AM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> >
> > > If Peer Heinlein would be kind enough to post
> > > the Exim version that exhibits th
Fabio Sangiovanni:
> Hello list,
>
> I need to put a SMTP relay between Internet and my company's mx (which
> stores inboxes), in order to do some processing.
> Current situation is that the mx receives messages directly from the
> Internet, without hops inbetween; on the mx, postfix is configur
On Sep 2, 2013, at 23:13, LuKreme wrote:
> For servers? Encrypting the drive on a always-on server seems a bit
> pointless. Once the machine is up and running, the drive is, as you said,
> unencrypted. However, if someone comes in to seize the machines, they will
> have to power them off and t
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 11:39:28AM -0700, FliedRice wrote:
> I do not know if this is just a strange coincidence or what, but now the
> google error has returned:
> Sep 3 10:22:03 boaz postfix/smtp[19614]: certificate verification failed
> for gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[74.125.142.26]:25: untrust
I do not know if this is just a strange coincidence or what, but now the
google error has returned:
Sep 3 10:22:03 boaz postfix/smtp[19614]: certificate verification failed
for gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[74.125.142.26]:25: untrusted issuer
/C=US/O=Equifax/OU=Equifax Secure Certificate Authority
I
Thanks Victor, but I believe it does have something to do with my servers
ability
to deliver email to Gmail, does it not?
http://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic/gmail/7QWAO_aunhc
This server has a newsletter program which sends a lot of email to Gmail,
it is important to comply with any nee
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 12:24:30PM -0700, FliedRice wrote:
> Thanks Victor, but I believe it does have something to do with my servers
> ability to deliver email to Gmail, does it not?
No, certificate verification is irrelevant. Gmail can't know
whether you verified their certificate or not.
>
Am 03.09.2013 21:41, schrieb Phil Pennock:
Hi,
> Debian used to patch, in their build system, the value passed to
> gnutls_dh_set_prime_bits() from 1024 to 2048. This is the value of the
> size of the DH parameters which is the "minimum considered acceptable".
> So Debian broke interop with "66
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 12:41:46PM -0700, Phil Pennock wrote:
> Okay, I have identified the root cause. The systems that need to be
> placated are older Debian installs, and the method should be broadly
> compatible.
>
> Debian used to patch, in their build system, the value passed to
> gnutls_d
11 matches
Mail list logo
