On an Ubuntu Server 12.04 system with Dovecot 2.0.19 I am having some
trouble with the Dovecot passwords. I am finding this in the logs when
I unsuccessfully try to log in:
Jul 07 08:13:25 auth-worker: Debug:
pam(u...@somedomain.com,212.
179.241.14): lookup service=dovecot
Jul 07 08:13:25 auth-wor
Note that testing in Telnet fails the password as well, both when
specifying the user without a domain and with a domain:
$ telnet mail.someDomain.com 143
Trying x.x.x.x...
Connected to mail.someDomain.com.
Escape character is '^]'.
* OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID EN
On Sun, 7 Jul 2013 11:29:55 +0300, Dotan Cohen
wrote:
> On an Ubuntu Server 12.04 system with Dovecot 2.0.19 I am having some
>
> $ /usr/bin/doveadm pw -u u...@somedomain.com -s DIGEST-MD5
> Enter new password: # Here I have typed "12345"
> {DIGEST-MD5}f4e442b0dec5009eaa8b9b4104923edc
> $ printf "
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Mark Alan wrote:
> The best place for this question is the Dovecot mailing list.
>
Wow, Mark, you're right! I'm sorry, I've been googling at this for
quite a while and my judgement must be impaired!
> That said, as a hint you should look at:
> http://wiki2.dovec
Hi all :-) I using notify classes:
notify_classes = bounce, 2bounce, data, delay, policy, protocol, resource,
software
postmaster receives correct "alert" emails
I'd like have also a notify when a local user send an email and there's an
error (something like remote smtp does not run - for purpos
> As it is now, no user, not even root, can override their own wildcard
> bind with a more specific bind. And that is a bug.
thanks all for help! :-)
I uncannily solved put "may" rather than "encrypted"
Pol
On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 06:20:00PM +0200, Pol Hallen wrote:
> Hi all :-) I am using notify classes:
Are you running a small personal MTA serving just yourself and perhaps
just a few more people? If so, perhaps this is OK.
> notify_classes = bounce, 2bounce, data, delay, policy, protocol, resour
Hi all, I have a question about notify_classes as well, so I figured I'd
jump in here and ask.
Mine is set to notify_classes = resource because it can't be left blank or
it will turn in to notify_classes = resource, software I believe (the
default), I would rather not get any notification emails.
On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 01:09:13PM -0400, AFCommerce LLC wrote:
> Mine is set to notify_classes = resource because it can't be left blank or
> it will turn in to notify_classes = resource, software I believe (the
> default)
This is inaccurate. Just set:
notify_classes =
and make sure y
Ok awesome, I must have misunderstood the docs about it setting blank as
the default, thank you very much!
Paul
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 01:09:13PM -0400, AFCommerce LLC wrote:
>
> > Mine is set to notify_classes = resource because it can't
> Are you running a small personal MTA serving just yourself and perhaps
> just a few more people? If so, perhaps this is OK.
yes
> My recommendation is to set "notify_classes = " (empty)
ok
> Postfix has a delay_warning_time parameter. This warning is correctly
> sent at most once per messag
On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 09:16:50PM +0200, Pol Hallen wrote:
> > Postfix has a delay_warning_time parameter. This warning is correctly
> > sent at most once per message.
>
> thanks! how known if my message is real sent from my smtp server? Setting
> delay_warning_time parameter to 5m (i.e.) I rec
Hello all
Not clued up on postfix at all so thought I would ask here.
I have primary and secondary MX servers, but my secondary server is on
cable. My primary server is on the backbone.
How can I configure my primary server to accept connections/mail from the
secondary server but still refuse co
Fred Zinsli:
> Hello all
>
> Not clued up on postfix at all so thought I would ask here.
>
> I have primary and secondary MX servers, but my secondary server is on
> cable. My primary server is on the backbone.
>
> How can I configure my primary server to accept connections/mail from the
> secon
On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 08:02:53PM -0400, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> > > > > > > When sending several mails in succession, failure and
> > > > > > > success seem to alternate (i.e. exactly one failed
> > > > > > > handshake, then a successful one, then a failed one again,
> > > > > > > etc.). And
15 matches
Mail list logo