* Wietse Venema [2013-05-31 22:57]:
> After the confusion that Postfix 2.10 is not Postfix 2.1, maybe it
> is time to change the release numbering scheme.
Okay, perhaps this is a European view, but I never confused Postfix
2.1 with 2.10. Perhaps because here it would be 2,1 and 2,10 if they
were
Ram:
> I am using a custom milter in my postfix to implement policy
> restrictions. If I want to quarantine a mail what should I return
>
> The milter site explains a function called quarantine
> https://www.milter.org/developers/api/smfi_quarantine
>
> Do I just make a call to this function in
James Zee skrev den 2013-05-31 06:43:
reject_rhsbl_sender dsn.rfc-ignorant.org
http://www.rfc-ignorant.de/
--
senders that put my email into body content will deliver it to my own
trashcan, so if you like to get reply, dont do it
I recently upgraded from 2.9.5 to 2.10 and ever since I've been having
an intermittent problem with email sent from within my web framework
(Interchange - icdevgroup.org) not reaching its recipient. I usually
get an error message in Interchange's log when there's a postfix
problem but not with thi
Grant:
> I recently upgraded from 2.9.5 to 2.10 and ever since I've been having
> an intermittent problem with email sent from within my web framework
> (Interchange - icdevgroup.org) not reaching its recipient. I usually
> get an error message in Interchange's log when there's a postfix
> problem
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 04:45:41PM -0700, Grant wrote:
> I know this is incredibly vague, but can anyone hazard a guess as to
> what the problem might be?
L O G S
L 0 0 G G S
L 0 0 G GG S
L
