http://officenouveau.co.za/egr/zvo.dwjjg
Hey List,
What is the most common solution to monitoring your postfix mailservers?
I use Icinga and Munin. Is there a good integration to these?
Best regards
Lars Nielsen
søn, 02 06 2013 kl. 12:14 -0300, skrev Mike:
> On 13-06-02 11:52 AM, Lars Nielsen wrote:
> > Hey List,
> >
> > What is the most common solution to monitoring your postfix mailservers?
> > I use Icinga and Munin. Is there a good integration to these?
> >
> That really depends on what you want to mon
On 2013-05-31 7:46 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2013-05-22 1:45 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
I would read the CHANGES file shipped with OpenSSL. They didn't
document the changes between 1.0.1d and 1.0.1e, but you can see the
changes between 1.0.1c and 1.0.1d.
I read them, but nothing ju
On 13-06-02 12:34 PM, Lars Nielsen wrote:
My primary use is to recieve emails for my domains. Next I want to relay
general emails for a limited amount of authenticated users.
Ok, so with step one, you're going to want to have another system send
email to a mailbox you host once every 'n' min
Lars Nielsen:
> s?n, 02 06 2013 kl. 12:14 -0300, skrev Mike:
> > On 13-06-02 11:52 AM, Lars Nielsen wrote:
> > > Hey List,
> > >
> > > What is the most common solution to monitoring your postfix mailservers?
> > > I use Icinga and Munin. Is there a good integration to these?
> > >
> > That really d
Le 02/06/2013 18:12, Wietse Venema a écrit :
Lars Nielsen:
s?n, 02 06 2013 kl. 12:14 -0300, skrev Mike:
On 13-06-02 11:52 AM, Lars Nielsen wrote:
Hey List,
What is the most common solution to monitoring your postfix mailservers?
I use Icinga and Munin. Is there a good integration to these?
On 06/02/2013 06:55 PM, Erwan David wrote:
Le 02/06/2013 18:12, Wietse Venema a écrit :
Lars Nielsen:
s?n, 02 06 2013 kl. 12:14 -0300, skrev Mike:
On 13-06-02 11:52 AM, Lars Nielsen wrote:
Hey List,
What is the most common solution to monitoring your postfix
mailservers?
I use Icinga and M
I'm getting a lot of connections that look like this:
submit/smtpd[62332]: connect from unknown[173.242.119.187]
submit/smtpd[62333]: connect from unknown[173.242.119.187]
submit/smtpd[62332]: setting up TLS connection from unknown[173.242.119.187]
submit/smtpd[62332]: unknown[173.242.119.187]: T
On 02 Jun 2013, at 15:24 , LuKreme wrote:
> I'm getting a lot of connections that look like this:
Never mind. I just noticed the difference between submit/smtpd and postfix/smtpd
Doh!
--
I WILL NOT SELL LAND IN FLORIDA Bart chalkboard Ep. 7F16
On 06/01/2013 08:53 AM, Jason Price wrote:
#smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks,
# reject_unauth_pipelining,
# reject_non_fqdn_recipient,
# reject_unknown_recipient_domain,
#
On 06/03/2013 12:44 PM, Peter wrote:
What you want instead is to move permit_mynetworks to the end of the
list and follow it by reject:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
reject_unauth_pipelining,
reject_non_fqdn_recipient,
reject_unknown_recipient_domain,
check_recipient_access = hash:/
I am using a custom milter in my postfix to implement policy
restrictions. If I want to quarantine a mail what should I return
The milter site explains a function called quarantine
https://www.milter.org/developers/api/smfi_quarantine
Do I just make a call to this function in the eom() and the
13 matches
Mail list logo
