Hi,
we have Postfix with LDAP backend , everything is working good but i think
we have some performance issues , but i can't sure :/ ( Our mailbox
folders are located Storage Drive mapped at Redhat Enterprise)
Every 5.0s: ./qshape.pl
Wed May 2
On 13-05-22 07:53 AM, Selcuk Yazar wrote:
Hi,
we have Postfix with LDAP backend , everything is working good but i
think we have some performance issues , but i can't sure :/ ( Our
mailbox folders are located Storage Drive mapped at Redhat Enterprise)
Have you looked at your logs to dete
On 2013-05-21 8:23 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
motty cruz skrev den 2013-05-21 02:04:
Does anybody have a script that work for autoresponders?
try the one in postfixadmin, note it does not reply to maillists blindly
Well... I had a lot of trouble with it responding to a lot of things
that i
Hi,
actually i forgot write additional info about our server, also we have
policyd deamon (cluebringer) , amavis(SpamAssasin, clamav) and dovecot .
when i looked up logs everything looking good for me :) . it flows like
waterfall . sometime when one e-mail comes from yahoo groups, it takes
minute
My daily run output (freebsd) sent this message (in part) for today.
Mail in submit queue:
-Queue ID- --Size-- Arrival Time -Sender/Recipient---
27FC0118B7AF 9831 Tue May 21 14:29:35 MAILER-DAEMON
(host eforward3.registrar-servers.com[38.101.213.199] said: 450 4.1.1
: Recipient a
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 01:53:15PM +0300, Selcuk Yazar wrote:
> we have Postfix with LDAP backend , everything is working good but i think
> we have some performance issues , but i can't sure :/ ( Our mailbox
> folders are located Storage Drive mapped at Redhat Enterprise)
>
>
> Every 5.0s: .
On 22 May 2013, at 7:36, LuKreme wrote:
My daily run output (freebsd) sent this message (in part) for today.
Mail in submit queue:
-Queue ID- --Size-- Arrival Time -Sender/Recipient---
27FC0118B7AF 9831 Tue May 21 14:29:35 MAILER-DAEMON
(host eforward3.registrar-servers.com[38.
I'm trying out postscreen and I have a couple of questions. First off, here's
my postscreen setup:
postscreen_access_list = permit_mynetworks
postscreen_blacklist_action = enforce
postscreen_dnsbl_action = enforce
postscreen_greet_action = enforce
postscreen_dnsbl_sites = zen.spamhaus.org*3
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 01:53:15PM +0300, Selcuk Yazar wrote:
>
> > we have Postfix with LDAP backend , everything is working good but i
> think
> > we have some performance issues , but i can't sure :/ ( Our mailbox
> > folders are locat
hello list,
i find error entries like these in my logs:
postfix/smtp[16790]: warning: TLS library problem:
16790:error:1408F10B:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_RECORD:wrong version
number:s3_pkt.c:340:
does that mean openssl or something is broken on my machine?
thanks
marko
Thank your suggestions, do you mind pointing to a source for vacation
script? I'm using FreeBSD
I tried to use Autoreply Software from here:
http://www.postfix.org/addon.html#autoreply
but one requires Java and the other works with LDAP, I don't have LDAP and
I'm not willing to use Java.
Thank y
On 5/22/2013 8:41 AM, Deeztek Support wrote:
> I'm trying out postscreen and I have a couple of questions. First
> off, here's my postscreen setup:
>
> postscreen_access_list = permit_mynetworks
> postscreen_blacklist_action = enforce
> postscreen_dnsbl_action = enforce
> postscreen_greet_action =
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 04:45:42PM +0300, Selcuk Yazar wrote:
> > >If your content filter is not very fast, bursts of mail will accumulate<
> > >while they are waiting to be scanned. Then the queue becomes empty.
> > >
> > >You may also have deferred mail that is retried periodically. You logs
>
Please don't top-post - response inline below...
On 2013-05-22 10:25 AM, motty cruz wrote:
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 4:11 AM, Charles Marcus
mailto:cmar...@media-brokers.com>> wrote:
On 2013-05-21 8:23 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
motty cruz skrev den 2013-05-21 02:04:
Do
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 03:57:49PM +0200, Marko Weber | ZBF wrote:
> I find error entries like these in my logs:
>
> postfix/smtp[16790]: warning: TLS library problem:
> 16790:error:1408F10B:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_RECORD:wrong version
> number:s3_pkt.c:340:
>
> does that mean openssl or somethin
Am 2013-05-22 17:54, schrieb Viktor Dukhovni:
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 03:57:49PM +0200, Marko Weber | ZBF wrote:
I find error entries like these in my logs:
postfix/smtp[16790]: warning: TLS library problem:
16790:error:1408F10B:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_RECORD:wrong version
number:s3_pkt.c:340:
On 2013-05-22 12:10 PM, Marko Weber | ZBF wrote:
i am on gentoo linux with openssl 1.0.1c.
Me too...
i remerge the openssl and restart postfix.
No need - you missed the significance of Viktor's 'no'...
This is nothing to worry about *unless* you are getting a significant
number of these
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 12:15:24PM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2013-05-22 12:10 PM, Marko Weber | ZBF wrote:
> >i am on gentoo linux with openssl 1.0.1c.
>
> Me too...
>
> >i remerge the openssl and restart postfix.
>
> No need - you missed the significance of Viktor's 'no'...
>
> This
On 2013-05-22 12:19 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
1.0.1c has some known issues, you should use 1.0.1e.
Hmmm... generally, gentoo is very good at keeping up with security or
critical functionality issues. 1.0.1c has been stable for quite some
time. Maybe they have added patches to address whatev
--On Wednesday, May 22, 2013 12:30 PM -0400 Charles Marcus
wrote:
On 2013-05-22 12:19 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
1.0.1c has some known issues, you should use 1.0.1e.
Hmmm... generally, gentoo is very good at keeping up with security or
critical functionality issues. 1.0.1c has been stable
thank you soo much Charles,
I was able to download that script you pointed in the last email,
now this maybe dumb questions but I would like to deploy this script on the
spam filter level before reaching our imap/pop server. At the spam filter
level I don't have a database for users,
I was hopin
On 2013-05-22 12:38 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Wednesday, May 22, 2013 12:30 PM -0400 Charles Marcus
wrote:
On 2013-05-22 12:19 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
1.0.1c has some known issues, you should use 1.0.1e.
Hmmm... generally, gentoo is very good at keeping up with security or
c
Hi,
The guidelines for setting up postfix with dovecot SASL recommends setting
the file permissions on /var/spool/postfix/private/auth to 660. Yet all the
other sockets in the .../private directory have 666 permissions. Does it
matter ? They are all owned by postfix:postfix and the parent dire
On 22 May 2013, at 11:02, Noel Jones wrote:
so, the RBLs are getting utilized by postscreen before it even hits
the smtp service. So, am I right to assume that the
reject_rbl_client lines in my smtpd_recipient_restrictions are no
longer needed?
No, not needed. But some folks like to leave t
I've set up dovecot to provide SASL for postfix and as far as I can
tell everything is working correctly. However, when I do a ehlo localhost
I don't see it announcing anything about AUTH :
Connected to localhost.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 xxx.yyy.QueensU.CA ESMTP Postfix
ehlo localhost
2
Again - please do not top-post. If you don't know what that means,
google is your friend.
On 2013-05-22 12:42 PM, motty cruz wrote:
thank you soo much Charles,
I was able to download that script you pointed in the last email,
You're welcome.
now this maybe dumb questions but I would like to
--On Wednesday, May 22, 2013 1:17 PM -0400 Charles Marcus
wrote:
On 2013-05-22 12:38 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Wednesday, May 22, 2013 12:30 PM -0400 Charles Marcus
wrote:
On 2013-05-22 12:19 PM, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
1.0.1c has some known issues, you should use 1.0.1e.
Hmm
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 01:33:35PM -0400, Peter Skensved wrote:
> The guidelines for setting up postfix with dovecot SASL recommends setting
> the file permissions on /var/spool/postfix/private/auth to 660.
This socket is created by Dovecot.
> Yet all the other sockets in the .../private directo
Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 01:33:35PM -0400, Peter Skensved wrote:
>
> > The guidelines for setting up postfix with dovecot SASL recommends setting
> > the file permissions on /var/spool/postfix/private/auth to 660.
>
> This socket is created by Dovecot.
>
> > Yet all the other s
On 5/22/2013 12:42 PM, Peter Skensved wrote:
> I've set up dovecot to provide SASL for postfix and as far as I can
> tell everything is working correctly. However, when I do a ehlo localhost
> I don't see it announcing anything about AUTH :
>
> Connected to localhost.
> Escape character is '^
On 22 May 2013, at 13:42, Peter Skensved wrote:
I've set up dovecot to provide SASL for postfix and as far as I can
tell everything is working correctly. However, when I do a ehlo
localhost
I don't see it announcing anything about AUTH :
Connected to localhost.
Escape character is '^]'.
220
On 5/22/2013 10:13 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 04:45:42PM +0300, Selcuk Yazar wrote:
>
If your content filter is not very fast, bursts of mail will accumulate<
while they are waiting to be scanned. Then the queue becomes empty.
You may also have deferr
On 5/22/2013 10:02 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
...
> Secondly, remember postscreen is intended as a quick-and-simple
> zombie killer, its only purpose is to reduce the workload on the
> more complex filters further downstream.
This fact is not emphasized often enough.
Many people forget the intended pu
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 03:00:44PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> > You'll probably find occasional
> > latency sending messages through the content filter. If that's a
> > problem, tune the content filter to remove DNS lookups or raise
> > its concurrency. If the content filter is using all avai
On 5/22/2013 4:04 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 03:00:44PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
>>> You'll probably find occasional
>>> latency sending messages through the content filter. If that's a
>>> problem, tune the content filter to remove DNS lookups or raise
>>> its conc
35 matches
Mail list logo
