Hi Patrick,
Am 2013-05-17 00:20, schrieb Patrick Ben Koetter:
Marko,
* Marko Weber | ZBF :
hello,
i set in amavid.conf : $final_bad_header_destiny = D_PASS;
but in logs i see this lines;
May 16 23:22:11 mail amavis[15703]: (15703-13) Passed BAD-HEADER-1
{RelayedOpenRelay,Quarantined}, [***.*
Hi Patrick,
i did it like described in your blog. (bit changed for my structure)
@local_domains_maps = (
".$mydomain",
read_hash('/etc/postfix/lookups/hash/virtual_domains_amavis')
); # list of all local domains
#
### weber stop
the result in logfile is now:
May 17 09:57:05 mail amavis[15982
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 07:48:24PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> /dev/rob0:
> > In the time since I've been running this, I saw the first thing
> > that might be seen as a problem: dnsblog timing out on one of
> > the DNSBL lookups:
> >
> > May 16 21:51:44 harrier postfix/postscreen[29502]: CONNEC
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:26:13PM -0500, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> > Increasing the greet-wait to 10+ seconds could result in
> > legitimate clients hanging up, so I would not recommend that.
>
> Do we have any testing to validate this? I'm pretty sure I recall
> from a few years back on the old origi
* Marko Weber | ZBF :
>
> Hi Patrick,
> i did it like described in your blog. (bit changed for my structure)
>
> @local_domains_maps = (
> ".$mydomain",
> read_hash('/etc/postfix/lookups/hash/virtual_domains_amavis')
> ); # list of all local domains
> #
> ### weber stop
>
> the result in logfil
postfi...@fuckaround.org skrev den 2013-05-16 14:10:
fuckaround postfix/local[5595]: ADDFD758237:
to=,
relay=local, delay=0.06, delays=0.03/0.01/0/0.02, dsn=5.1.1,
status=bounced (unknown user: "fred")
useradd fred
fred is not yet an unix user :=)
--
senders that put my email into body cont
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 05:53:47PM +, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:26:13PM -0500, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> Wietse:
> > > Increasing the greet-wait to 10+ seconds could result in
> > > legitimate clients hanging up, so I would not recommend that.
> >
> > Do we have any testing
/dev/rob0:
>
> I guess this says that postscreen_dnsbl_action fires at the end of
> the greet pause when postscreen_dnsbl_threshold is met, but
> postscreen_dnsbl_whitelist_threshold is not calculated. Here's the
[begin background material]
I mis-understood how postscreen works (I do not cons
Marko Weber | ZBF:
> hello ,
>
> i find many of these in my mail.log:
>
> May 16 14:27:33 mail opendkim[2926]: 119CA2FB20: s=dktest
> d=porcupine.org SSL error:04091068:rsa routines:INT_RSA_VERIFY:bad
> signature
>
> is my openssl broken or something else glitchy? or does this mean the
> dkim
Wietse Venema:
> Marko Weber | ZBF:
> > hello ,
> >
> > i find many of these in my mail.log:
> >
> > May 16 14:27:33 mail opendkim[2926]: 119CA2FB20: s=dktest
> > d=porcupine.org SSL error:04091068:rsa routines:INT_RSA_VERIFY:bad
> > signature
> >
> > is my openssl broken or something else gli
Wietse Venema:
> I can change postscreen to also use partial scores for whitelisting
> of non-DNS tests, and thereby make whitelisting of non-DNS tests
> consistent with DNS-based blocking (that's one less WTF factor).
> This requires minor code duplication.
Released as
s one
> > less WTF factor). This requires minor code duplication.
>
> Released as snapshot 20130517.
For testing I reenabled PSBL, and I'll see what comes in overnight.
I thought I could make my own pseudo-DNSBL on a random IP address
with blocked ports 53, but I need to set up a
12 matches
Mail list logo
