limited syntax in regexp:header_checks ?

2013-05-16 Thread Patrick Proniewski
Hello, I'm trying to create an header_check filter (regexp format) that would issue a warning (or info) when the "References:" header is longer than 800 characters. I've discovered that using this kind of syntax won't work: /^References: .\{800,\}$/ INFO too long /^Refere

virtual user (unknown user)

2013-05-16 Thread postfixml
Hi folks! After read many howto I try to use virtual user. I understand that user@domain2 goes to user@domain1. I need that user@domain2 goes to user@domain2 mailbox: virtual_alias_domains = nuvolabianca.org virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual virtual_mailbox_domains = nuvolabianca.or

Re: limited syntax in regexp:header_checks ?

2013-05-16 Thread LuKreme
Patrick Proniewski opined on Thursday 16-May-2013@05:53:38 > /^References: .{80,}$/ INFO too long > > But I really need 800, not 80. Any idea? If I member correctly the value for RE_DUPE_MAX is 255. Does /^References: .{200}.{200}.{200}.{200,}$/ INFO too long Work? -- Pl

virtual delivery and catch-all at a time

2013-05-16 Thread Sebastian Krajenski
Hello everybody,   I have an issue which I did not find covered in a manual so far, I hope you can help: (We're using postfix 2.7.x from Debian Squeeze)   main.cf: [...] virtual_mailbox_domains = company.de virtual_mailbox_maps = ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap-users-company.cf virtual_alias_maps =

Re: limited syntax in regexp:header_checks ?

2013-05-16 Thread Wietse Venema
Patrick Proniewski: > Hello, > > I'm trying to create an header_check filter (regexp format) that > would issue a warning (or info) when the "References:" header is > longer than 800 characters. I've discovered that using this kind > of syntax won't work: > > /^References: .\{800,\}$/

Re: Postfix not speaking with amavis?

2013-05-16 Thread Stan Hoeppner
On 5/15/2013 7:21 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > Viktor Dukhovni: >> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 06:37:14PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote: >> >>> You're making incorrect assumptions about the usefulness of software >>> based solely on revision numbers, of which you apparently have little or >>> no understandi

Re: virtual user (unknown user)

2013-05-16 Thread Wietse Venema
postfi...@fuckaround.org: > fuckaround postfix/local[5595]: ADDFD758237: to=, > relay=local, delay=0.06, delays=0.03/0.01/0/0.02, dsn=5.1.1, > status=bounced (unknown user: "fred") You use local(8). As documented "fred" MUST exist as a UNIX system account name, or as an alias in the LOCAL (NOT vir

Re: virtual user (unknown user)

2013-05-16 Thread Pol Hallen
> You use local(8). As documented "fred" MUST exist as a UNIX system > account name, or as an alias in the LOCAL (NOT virtual) aliases(5) > file (typically named /etc/aliases or similar). HI and thanks for your reply :-) I've this line: mailbox_command = /usr/bin/procmail -a "$EXTENSION" DEFAULT

Re: Postfix not speaking with amavis?

2013-05-16 Thread Wietse Venema
Stan Hoeppner: > On 5/15/2013 7:21 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > Viktor Dukhovni: > >> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 06:37:14PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > >> > >>> You're making incorrect assumptions about the usefulness of software > >>> based solely on revision numbers, of which you apparently have l

Re: virtual user (unknown user)

2013-05-16 Thread Wietse Venema
Pol Hallen: > > You use local(8). As documented "fred" MUST exist as a UNIX system > > account name, or as an alias in the LOCAL (NOT virtual) aliases(5) > > file (typically named /etc/aliases or similar). > > HI and thanks for your reply :-) > > I've this line: > > mailbox_command = /usr/bin/pr

Re: virtual user (unknown user)

2013-05-16 Thread Pol Hallen
> Why are you giving mail for "fred" to the local(8) delivery agent? Sorry :-) Tell me how does not give to "fred". Also commenting the line with mailbox_command, I don't understand how delivery mail to virtual host users. thanks

Re: virtual user (unknown user)

2013-05-16 Thread Wietse Venema
Pol Hallen: > > Why are you giving mail for "fred" to the local(8) delivery agent? > > Sorry :-) Tell me how does not give to "fred". You try to deliver mail for fred@domain-that-resolves-to-local(8) Why? - Is this the wrong domain name? What shuold it be instead? - Is this the right domain na

Re: virtual user (unknown user)

2013-05-16 Thread Pol Hallen
> - Is this the right domain name but the wrong delivery agent? myhostname = server1.fuckaround.org mydomain = fuckaround.org

Re: virtual user (unknown user)

2013-05-16 Thread Ansgar Wiechers
On 2013-05-16 postfi...@fuckaround.org wrote: > I understand that user@domain2 goes to user@domain1. I need that > user@domain2 goes to user@domain2 mailbox: > > virtual_alias_domains = nuvolabianca.org > virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual > > virtual_mailbox_domains = nuvolabianca.or

Re: virtual user (unknown user)

2013-05-16 Thread Wietse Venema
Pol Hallen: > > - Is this the right domain name but the wrong delivery agent? > > myhostname = server1.fuckaround.org > mydomain = fuckaround.org If this is the right domain but wrong delivery agent, see http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_CLASS_README.html which describes how Postfix selects the "kno

Re: limited syntax in regexp:header_checks ?

2013-05-16 Thread Patrick Proniewski
On 16 mai 2013, at 14:26, Wietse Venema wrote: > Patrick Proniewski: >> Hello, >> >> I'm trying to create an header_check filter (regexp format) that >> would issue a warning (or info) when the "References:" header is >> longer than 800 characters. I've discovered that using this kind >> of synta

Re: Postfix not speaking with amavis?

2013-05-16 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 07:27:59AM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote: [begin hostility] > >>> You're making incorrect assumptions about the usefulness of software > >>> based solely on revision numbers, of which you apparently have little or > >>> no understanding. [end hostility] [begin sarcasm] > >>>Y

postfix ssl errors in log, what does they mean?

2013-05-16 Thread Marko Weber | ZBF
hello , i find many of these in my mail.log: May 16 14:27:33 mail opendkim[2926]: 119CA2FB20: s=dktest d=porcupine.org SSL error:04091068:rsa routines:INT_RSA_VERIFY:bad signature is my openssl broken or something else glitchy? or does this mean the dkim from porcupine.org ist invalid? th

Re: postfix ssl errors in log, what does they mean?

2013-05-16 Thread /dev/rob0
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 09:08:08PM +0200, Marko Weber | ZBF wrote: > i find many of these in my mail.log: > > May 16 14:27:33 mail opendkim[2926]: 119CA2FB20: s=dktest > d=porcupine.org SSL error:04091068:rsa routines:INT_RSA_VERIFY:bad > signature I don't see "postfix" anywhere in that. > is my

Re: postscreen_dnsbl_whitelist_threshold

2013-05-16 Thread /dev/rob0
In the time since I've been running this, I saw the first thing that might be seen as a problem: dnsblog timing out on one of the DNSBL lookups: May 16 21:51:44 harrier postfix/postscreen[29502]: CONNECT from [208.66.205.36]:53814 to [207.223.116.211]:25 May 16 21:51:44 harrier postfix/dnsblog[

Tweaking DNS timeouts (was: postscreen_dnsbl_whitelist_threshold)

2013-05-16 Thread Wietse Venema
/dev/rob0: > In the time since I've been running this, I saw the first thing that > might be seen as a problem: dnsblog timing out on one of the DNSBL > lookups: > > May 16 21:51:44 harrier postfix/postscreen[29502]: CONNECT from > [208.66.205.36]:53814 to [207.223.116.211]:25 > May 16 21:51:44

Re: virtual user (unknown user)

2013-05-16 Thread Ansgar Wiechers
Please keep this conversation on-list. I don't do personal support for free. On 2013-05-16 Pol Hallen wrote: >> Remove that line from /etc/postfix/virtual (don't forget to re-hash >> it afterwards) and make sure you have a proper entry for the address >> in /etc/postfix/vmailbox. >> >> All of this