enable_long_queue_ids and pickup

2013-04-30 Thread Reindl Harald
Hi i have on all machines "enable_long_queue_ids = yes" and one of them is producing the old queue-id's daily by pickup via logwatch and interesting is that there exists a 1:1 clone (put one of the RAID1 disks into the same hardware and change only the machine-name) without this behavior [root@l

Re: enable_long_queue_ids and pickup

2013-04-30 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 11:33:25AM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > i have on all machines "enable_long_queue_ids = yes" and one of them is > producing > the old queue-id's daily by pickup via logwatch and interesting is that there > exists a 1:1 clone (put one of the RAID1 disks into the same hardw

Re: enable_long_queue_ids and pickup

2013-04-30 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 30.04.2013 16:02, schrieb Viktor Dukhovni: > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 11:33:25AM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > >> i have on all machines "enable_long_queue_ids = yes" and one of them is >> producing >> the old queue-id's daily by pickup via logwatch and interesting is that there >> exists a 1:1

Re: enable_long_queue_ids and pickup

2013-04-30 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 04:17:33PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Apr 29 02:33:03 localhost postfix/cleanup[8012]: 36CA45F1B2: > > > message-id=<20120429003303.36CA45F1B2@localhost> > > > > This log entry is from one year ago > > damned - where did you notice it is from 2012? I highly recom

Re: enable_long_queue_ids and pickup

2013-04-30 Thread Pau Amma
On Tue, April 30, 2013 2:17 pm, Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 30.04.2013 16:02, schrieb Viktor Dukhovni: >> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 11:33:25AM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> Apr 29 02:33:03 localhost postfix/cleanup[8012]: 36CA45F1B2: >>> message-id=<20120429003303.36CA45F1B2@localhost> > > damned - w

Re: enable_long_queue_ids and pickup

2013-04-30 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 30.04.2013 16:33, schrieb Pau Amma: > On Tue, April 30, 2013 2:17 pm, Reindl Harald wrote: >> Am 30.04.2013 16:02, schrieb Viktor Dukhovni: >>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 11:33:25AM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: Apr 29 02:33:03 localhost postfix/cleanup[8012]: 36CA45F1B2: message-id=<2012

Make install or upgrade for new install location

2013-04-30 Thread Larry Stone
I have been running Postfix under Mac OS X for a number of years (now on OS X 10.7.latest (Lion)). I am working on moving away from the Apple provided and customized Postfix to "real" Postfix built from sources. I've successfully built Postfix but not yet tested. To avoid having it overwritten

Re: Make install or upgrade for new install location

2013-04-30 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 12:02:11PM -0500, Larry Stone wrote: > I have been running Postfix under Mac OS X for a number of years > (now on OS X 10.7.latest (Lion)). I am working on moving away from > the Apple provided and customized Postfix to "real" Postfix built > from sources. I've successfully

Re: Make install or upgrade for new install location

2013-04-30 Thread Larry Stone
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: When it comes time to install, do I do "make install" or "make upgrade"? It's not clear to me if "make upgrade" will work when the upgrade is in a different location than the previous version. You could consider the Postfix from macports. I did con

Re: Make install or upgrade for new install location

2013-04-30 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 30.04.2013 21:20, schrieb Larry Stone: > FWIW, I consider Lion (10.7) to be the last version of OS X for which the > Apple provided Postfix is usable. For > Mountain Lion (10.8), they changed a lot of the default directories but also > removed amavisd-new (compatability > through OS upgrades a

Re: Make install or upgrade for new install location

2013-04-30 Thread Bill Cole
On 30 Apr 2013, at 15:20, Larry Stone wrote: On Tue, 30 Apr 2013, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: When it comes time to install, do I do "make install" or "make upgrade"? It's not clear to me if "make upgrade" will work when the upgrade is in a different location than the previous version. You could

Re: Make install or upgrade for new install location

2013-04-30 Thread James Brown
On 01/05/2013, at 3:02 AM, Larry Stone wrote: > I have been running Postfix under Mac OS X for a number of years (now on OS X > 10.7.latest (Lion)). I am working on moving away from the Apple provided and > customized Postfix to "real" Postfix built from sources. I've successfully > built Pos

Solution for Store in Virtual then Transport

2013-04-30 Thread Newton Pasqualini Filho
Dear List, I am facing some trouble to find a way to get a solution running. We have here two mail servers, one to serve PCs and another to serve Mobile devices. The first is the primary and setter as MX for the domain, the second in only a secondary store server, that will give mobile devices

Re: Make install or upgrade for new install location

2013-04-30 Thread Larry Stone
On Apr 30, 2013, at 2:27 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 30.04.2013 21:20, schrieb Larry Stone: >> FWIW, I consider Lion (10.7) to be the last version of OS X for which the >> Apple provided Postfix is usable. For >> Mountain Lion (10.8), they changed a lot of the default directories but also >>

Re: Make install or upgrade for new install location

2013-04-30 Thread Larry Stone
On Apr 30, 2013, at 7:02 PM, Bill Cole wrote: > Yes, it can. MacPorts creates its own world under /opt/local and uses very > limited parts of of the base system (e.g. the XCode build toolchain) where > necessary. There's no simple way to tell MacPorts that you've installed > dependencies out

Re: Solution for Store in Virtual then Transport

2013-04-30 Thread Noel Jones
On 4/30/2013 7:20 PM, Newton Pasqualini Filho wrote: > Dear List, > > I am facing some trouble to find a way to get a solution running. > > We have here two mail servers, one to serve PCs and another to serve > Mobile devices. > > The first is the primary and setter as MX for the domain, the sec