Hi,
While it's easy enough to spoof single IP packets, it's far more
difficult to spoof a whole SMTP conversation.
Very well. If adding the IP address to mynetworks provides sufficient
security against abuse of my server, I will leave it to that.
Thanks for the advice.
Lucas
Hi,
Since i have upgrade my postfix from 2.6.x to 2.8.x or 2.10.x postfix
don't send the command QUIT after the response (code 250) to END-OF-MESSAGE.
Debug :
Before with postfix 2.6.18 :
...
Apr 22 14:36:47 dedi dkimproxy.in[18373]: DKIM verify - none;
from=
Apr
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 03:01:04PM +0200, L.W. van Braam van Vloten wrote:
> > While it's easy enough to spoof single IP packets, it's far more
> > difficult to spoof a whole SMTP conversation.
>
> Very well. If adding the IP address to mynetworks provides sufficient
> security against abuse of my
Ludovic LEVET:
> Hi,
>
> Since i have upgrade my postfix from 2.6.x to 2.8.x or 2.10.x postfix
> don't send the command QUIT after the response (code 250) to END-OF-MESSAGE.
> dedi.ludosoft.org[127.0.0.1]
Why is this a problem, three years after the change was made?
Wietse
Sorry to not upgrade before, but 2.6.X version is already supported
version ... :-)
Sorry to see that this upper version brake the RFC protocol submission
(when it talk to proxy) since 3 years ...
Ludovic.
Le 22/04/2013 18:21, Wietse Venema a écrit :
Ludovic LEVET:
Hi,
Since i have upgrade
Hello,
I've been debugging timeout problems using openssl commandline client.
local.host:~# openssl s_client -connect 192.168.172.1:25 -starttls smtp
CONNECTED(0003)
depth=0 /CN=remote.mail.domain
verify error:num=18:self signed certificate
verify return:1
depth=0 /CN=remote.mail.domain
veri
This started showing up sporadically in our logs after upgrading to postfix
2.10:
Apr 22 14:42:50 zqa-061 postfix/trivial-rewrite[30487]: warning: do not
list domain zqa-061.eng.vmware.com in BOTH mydestination and
virtual_mailbox_domains
However, it is not listed in both:
zimbra@zqa-061:~
> Very well. If adding the IP address to mynetworks provides sufficient
> security against abuse of my server, I will leave it to that.
TCP and therefore SMTP is a bidirectional protocol (SYN-ACK and such).
If you really estimate an attacker between you and the remote end, you
will need *verified
no brake but broke
See RFC5321 :
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5321.txt
4.1.1.10. QUIT (QUIT)
This command specifies that the receiver MUST send a "221 OK" reply,
and then close the transmission channel.
The receiver MUST NOT intentionally close the transmission channel
until i
Juri Grabowski:
> postconf:
>
> 2bounce_notice_recipient = postmaster
No-one is going to read over 700 lines of output.
Perhaps you did not notice that you should send "postconf -n" output.
Wietse
Ludovic LEVET:
> no brake but broke
If your server cannot handle a missing QUIT, get a better one.
Wietse
Hello, my friend
This is tom, I'm sending my greeting from China
I got some problem, and need your help
This mail is in the queue, but I hold it,just like that
C94C6AC00D4!3372 Wed Apr 17 19:07:51 MAILER-DAEMON
(mail for uhb.com loops back to
myself)
12 matches
Mail list logo