On 04/16/2013 08:03 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Frank Bonnet:
hello
I use sender_canonical_maps to rewrite sender addresses
since years.
Due to end of support of vexira anti-virus for mail server
I moved to the amavis-new + clamav + spamassassin
installed from FreeBSD ports.
Everything works wel
Am 2013-04-17 10:00, schrieb Frank Bonnet:
-o local_header_rewrite_clients=
http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_REWRITING_README.html:
NOTE: Postfix versions 2.2 and later rewrite message headers from
remote SMTP clients only if the client matches the
local_header_rewrite_clients parameter,
Hiya,
Thanks for the replies, turns out that NATing was the answer and, as I
came here first, I thought I'd post instructions for anyone else with
the same problem whose searching even though it's not a postfix problem.
The UTM is Endian, here's the solution:
1, You don't need to set the ex
On 04/17/2013 10:08 AM, Timo Röhling wrote:
Am 2013-04-17 10:00, schrieb Frank Bonnet:
-o local_header_rewrite_clients=
http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_REWRITING_README.html:
NOTE: Postfix versions 2.2 and later rewrite message headers from
remote SMTP clients only if the client matches
Hi,
my Question is: Is it possible to implement routing control of locally
generated bounces in Postfix - WITHOUT impact to remotely generated bounces?
And in case it is: How can this be accomplished?
Thanks for any hint
Hi all!
Almost configured postfix on my lan, I can't discover how bounce mail
when the size attachments is too big to destination server.
i.e. I send an email with attachments 30Mb to @yahoo.it, @tiscali.it
by mailq I see the error: destination server can't accept that mail
because the attachmen
Hi all!
Almost configured postfix on my lan, I can't discover how bounce mail
when the size attachments is too big to destination server.
i.e. I send an email with attachments 30Mb to @yahoo.it, @tiscali.it
by mailq I see the error: destination server can't accept that mail
because the attachmen
Am 17.04.2013 14:46, schrieb Pol Hallen:
> Almost configured postfix on my lan, I can't discover how bounce mail
> when the size attachments is too big to destination server.
>
> i.e. I send an email with attachments 30Mb to @yahoo.it, @tiscali.it
>
> by mailq I see the error: destination serve
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 12:11:52PM +0200, nullnullachtfuenfz...@arcor.de wrote:
> my Question is: Is it possible to implement routing control of
> locally generated bounces in Postfix - WITHOUT impact to remotely
> generated bounces?
> And in case it is: How can this be accomplished?
What problem
Ave Maria!
I have Dovecot and Postifx setup with MySQL - emails seem to go through
the server but for some reason the pipe into the wrong Virtual Domain
any ideas (postfix/pipe)?
e.g. to=, orig_to=
why would it do this?
mail.info logs:
Apr 12 13:30:14 Server1 postfix/smtpd[21411]: connect
Dan Clovis:
> Apr 12 13:30:14 Server1 postfix/trivial-rewrite[21415]: warning: do not
> list domain ccpop.itco.co in BOTH mydestination and virtual_mailbox_domains
Is this the problem domain? Then that would explain why mail is
delivered into the wrong channel.
Wietse
Hi!
I have a special situation where Postfix doesn't replace the header-from
correctly while using sender_canonical_maps.
There's a working sender_canonical_maps:
root@mx01:~# postmap -q ckl...@example.com
ldap:/etc/postfix/canonical-sender.ldap
calvin.kl...@example.com
root@mx01:~#
And ever
Peer Heinlein:
> local_header_rewrite_clients = permit
I don't recall that "permit" is valid in this context.
Wietse
Am 17.04.2013 23:31, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> Peer Heinlein:
>> local_header_rewrite_clients = permit
>
> I don't recall that "permit" is valid in this context.
static:all hasn't worked too.
Peer
--
Heinlein Support GmbH
Schwedter Str. 8/9b, 10119 Berlin
http://www.heinlein-support.de
Tel:
Peer Heinlein:
> Am 17.04.2013 23:31, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> > Peer Heinlein:
> >> local_header_rewrite_clients = permit
> >
> > I don't recall that "permit" is valid in this context.
>
> static:all hasn't worked too.
It rewrites both envelope sender and header sender, as expected.
Perhaps you
15 matches
Mail list logo