> I was lurking around for the best solution to graph postfix usage, the
> most detailed possible, in order to prevent and foresee problems.
> I'm finding sparse results, I'm not sure which one is the most current /
> complete.
> Do you have any suggestions ?
have a look at Glen's cacti stuff
ht
we have a contractor given an email address for use in contacting clients,
the boss would like to bcc all his outbound mails, is there a way to bcc
all outbound emails for one user ?
(I realize he can simply change his smtp to another smtp server to
overcome this, but, that's what the boss wants..
Is it possible to customize the bounce messages and include an encapsulated
html message for MIME-compliant clients? If yes, is there some reason why one
should not do that? I'd like to make postfix bounce messages easier readable
for the average user...
Thanks,
Juerg
Am 30.01.2013 13:13, schrieb Fernando Maior:
> In the area where my office is, internet providers cannot offer us links with
> fixed ip, only dhcp. I wonder if
> someone in the list knows about a mail forwarder server that can receive
> emails from my server and forwards them to
> the internet
Am 30.01.2013 13:43, schrieb Juerg Reimann:
> Is it possible to customize the bounce messages and include an encapsulated
> html message for MIME-compliant clients? If yes, is there some reason why one
> should not do that? I'd like to make postfix bounce messages easier readable
> for the ave
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 10:13:58 -0200
Fernando Maior articulated:
> In the area where my office is, internet providers cannot offer us
> links with fixed ip, only dhcp. I wonder if someone in the list knows
> about a mail forwarder server that can receive emails from my server
> and forwards them to
On 1/30/2013 6:13 AM, Fernando Maior wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> In the area where my office is, internet providers cannot offer us links
> with fixed ip, only dhcp. I wonder if someone in the list knows about a
> mail forwarder server that can receive emails from my server and forwards
> them to the
Juerg Reimann:
> Is it possible to customize the bounce messages and include an
> encapsulated html message for MIME-compliant clients? If yes, is
> there some reason why one should not do that? I'd like to make
> postfix bounce messages easier readable for the average user...
All Postfix features
On 1/30/2013 at 3:55 AM Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
|On 1/29/2013 8:07 PM, Mike. wrote:
|>
|> I implemented the postscreen capability on a small MTA I run for
|> friends and family. Once I got postscreen configuration producing
the
|> results I wanted, I soon tired of watching the detailed maillog to
Peter von Nostrand:
> dovecot unix - n n - - pipe
> flags=DRhu user=vmail:vmail argv=/usr/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-lda -f
> ${sender} -d ${recipient}
>
> How can I send to Dovecot the username from the mail or proxyaddress alias
> field?
perhaps surprisingly, this is described in the pipe(8) man
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:34:13AM -0300, Peter von Nostrand wrote:
> The users data is on Active Directory.
> Users has different email addresses to their username on AD and they have
> aliases on proxyaddress field.
>
> Here is the AD query:
>
> server_host = dc1.intranet.local
> search_base =
On Jan 30, 2013, at 09.34, Peter von Nostrand wrote:
> dovecot unix - n n - - pipe
> flags=DRhu user=vmail:vmail argv=/usr/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-lda -f
> ${sender} -d ${recipient}
i'd encourage you to consider delivering to dovecot via lmtp[1] rather than
pipe, and thus to consider using the
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:34:13AM -0300, Peter von Nostrand wrote:
>
> > query_filter = (&(objectclass=Person)(|(mail=%s)(proxyAddresses=%s)))
>
> This query is perhaps wrong, the "proxyAddresses" field in AD usually
> contains address fo
I made some changes to the script based upon the excellent feedback I
received here.
The script no longer wanders beyond the postscreen log records in order
to gather the information needed to determine the postscreen rejection
rate. So that removes the problems caused by multiple-recipient
m
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:13:58AM -0200, Fernando Maior wrote:
> In the area where my office is, internet providers cannot offer us
> links with fixed ip, only dhcp. I wonder if someone in the list
> knows about a mail forwarder server that can receive emails from my
> server and forwards them
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:31:21PM +1100, li...@sbt.net.au wrote:
> we have a contractor given an email address for use in contacting
> clients, the boss would like to bcc all his outbound mails, is
> there a way to bcc all outbound emails for one user ?
>
> (I realize he can simply change his s
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:22:35PM +0100, M. Fioretti wrote:
> of course, any comment on this is still welcome, as well as on any
> weakness in my server postconf -n output.
The original issue was to be able to relay from a dynamic residential
IP address on your server. Your solution, adding the
I seem to be missing smtp log events regarding delivery status for TLS
enabled mail when smtp_tls_loglevel = 3. I see a ton of TLS data as
expected, but the actual smtp result is no longer present. Is there any
explanation for this behavior?
mail_version = 2.6.6
#sample TLS mail
grep CAEAB20079
Asa Gage:
> I seem to be missing smtp log events regarding delivery status for TLS
> enabled mail when smtp_tls_loglevel = 3. I see a ton of TLS data as
> expected, but the actual smtp result is no longer present. Is there any
> explanation for this behavior?
syslog uses a connection-less trans
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 05:07:47PM -0500, Asa Gage wrote:
> I seem to be missing smtp log events regarding delivery status for
> TLS enabled mail when smtp_tls_loglevel = 3.
Below you have showed us nothing which would be affected by the
setting of smtp_tls_loglevel.
> I see a ton of TLS data a
Le 30/01/2013 13:13, Fernando Maior a écrit :
> Hello All,
>
> In the area where my office is, internet providers cannot offer us links
> with fixed ip, only dhcp. I wonder if someone in the list knows about a
> mail forwarder server that can receive emails from my server and forwards
> them to the
On 1/30/2013 4:32 PM, Mike. wrote:
=
I've tried it on logs up to 40MB, and it ran to completion in around
five seconds. However, for that test, I copied the log file off the
production mail server and on to a lightly loaded box.
It's a pretty decent speed.
I have wrote a script
22 matches
Mail list logo
