Re: Relay Exceptions

2013-01-25 Thread Jamie Paul Griffin
* Noel Jones [2013-01-23 12:37:28 -0600]: > On 1/23/2013 12:30 PM, Tom Tucker wrote: > > > > I think I got it. The ordering is critical. Thanks > > > > > > smtpd_recipient_restrictions = > > check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/relay_domains # > > This will allow clients missing

Re: how to use a mailing list

2013-01-25 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 25.01.2013 10:43, schrieb Dibyendra Hyoju: > I have installed postfix in my local machine and it's working. In the > configuration I added following line: > mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8 , 192.168.0.0/24 > > > However, in the rackspace having IP: 50.57

Re: how to use a mailing list

2013-01-25 Thread Tom Kinghorn
On 25/01/2013 13:21, Reindl Harald wrote: first: you should start wih a subject to your mails second: provide "postconf -n" output as statet in the welcome message third: describe your problem "could not get to work" is no description And read the documents..( I am not going to say RTFM)

Re: your mail

2013-01-25 Thread Wietse Venema
Dibyendra Hyoju: > I have installed postfix in my local machine and it's working. In the > configuration I added following line: > mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8, 192.168.0.0/24 > > However, in the rackspace having IP: 50.57.179.51, I could not get postfix > to work. I am not sure what configuration is

Re: Relay Exceptions

2013-01-25 Thread Noel Jones
On 1/25/2013 4:29 AM, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote: > * Noel Jones [2013-01-23 12:37:28 -0600]: > >> On 1/23/2013 12:30 PM, Tom Tucker wrote: >>> >>> I think I got it. The ordering is critical. Thanks >>> >>> >>> smtpd_recipient_restrictions = >>> check_recipient_access hash:/etc/postfix/re

misconfiguration standard spf

2013-01-25 Thread ml
hello guys hello I'm fine and everything is going well on the whole better. I want to evoke a thought higher of us. I followed the outstanding issues lately on hotmail and problems of validation spf (the spf is: do the simplest and shortest possible). I noticed the strange behavior in my validati

Re: Sufficiently locked down?

2013-01-25 Thread btb
On Jan 24, 2013, at 22.57, Stan Hoeppner wrote: >> commendably, he is at least making an attempt to properly use submission >> [which, btw, is far from "useless" and has nothing to do with the route a >> packet might take]. > > The primary features of the submission service are TLS encryption a

Re: Sufficiently locked down?

2013-01-25 Thread Stan Hoeppner
On 1/25/2013 10:18 AM, b...@bitrate.net wrote: > On Jan 24, 2013, at 22.57, Stan Hoeppner wrote: >> The primary features of the submission service are TLS encryption and >> authentication. > > the primary feature of the submission service is to provide different ports > for servers and clients,

Re: Sufficiently locked down?

2013-01-25 Thread btb
On Jan 25, 2013, at 13.29, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > On 1/25/2013 10:18 AM, b...@bitrate.net wrote: >> On Jan 24, 2013, at 22.57, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > >>> The primary features of the submission service are TLS encryption and >>> authentication. >> >> the primary feature of the submission service

Upgrade for Postfix & Mailman

2013-01-25 Thread Jeff Bernier
Hello All, I am currently running Mailman (2.1.14) and Postfix (2.4.3) on an aging Mac OS X server (10.5.8). Mailman and Postfix on this system are Apple's implementation on their platform of course. Apple no longer supports the Xserve platform, and I am in need of replacing this system, and upgra

Re: Upgrade for Postfix & Mailman

2013-01-25 Thread btb
On Jan 25, 2013, at 15.07, Jeff Bernier wrote: > Hello All, > > I am currently running Mailman (2.1.14) and Postfix (2.4.3) on an aging Mac > OS X server (10.5.8). Mailman and Postfix on this system are Apple's > implementation on their platform of course. Apple no longer supports the > Xserve pl

Re: Upgrade for Postfix & Mailman

2013-01-25 Thread Larry Stone
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013, b...@bitrate.net wrote: On Jan 25, 2013, at 15.07, Jeff Bernier wrote: Hello All, I am currently running Mailman (2.1.14) and Postfix (2.4.3) on an aging Mac OS X server (10.5.8). Mailman and Postfix on this system are Apple's implementation on their platform of course. A

Re: Upgrade for Postfix & Mailman

2013-01-25 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 25.01.2013 23:46, schrieb Larry Stone: > One of the problems of the past was Apple's constant behind the scenes > changes which required some reconfiguration > at every major upgrade. If I do ever move forward with trying to upgrade, I > most likely will go "build from > sources" for everyth

Re: Recommendations for antivirus

2013-01-25 Thread Jeroen Geilman
On 01/16/2013 10:55 PM, TFML wrote: I'm running a server on average week we receive 14,000, send 19,000, and in total deferred/bounced/rejected 5,000 Are you certain of those numbers ? For any publically-reachable MX host, the amount of spam rejected is AT LEAST 10 times the amount of desira