Le 06/12/2012 06:22, Pierre-Gilles RAYNAUD a écrit :
> Hi Everyone,
>
> On 01/12/12 18:19, Noel Jones wrote:
>> On 12/1/2012 11:11 AM, PGR wrote:
>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>
>>> I would like to know how to stop/forbid this server to send us their emails
>>>
>>> The content of received email is
>>>
>>> Rec
Am 07.12.2012 22:29, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> Florian Pritz:
>
> Checking application/pgp-signature: FAILURE
> -- Start of PGP signed section.
> [ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've just seen the following log entry:
>>> postfix/smtp[21188]: A494013804C: host eggs.gnu.org
Am 08.12.2012 13:26, schrieb Robert Sander:
>> You assume that all response lines will have the same reply code,
>> but that is not necessarily true. If Postfix were to log the first
>> reply code only, then you would never be aware of the discrepancy.
>
> RFC821 Appendix E states:
>
> The for
On 8/12/2012 1:07 πμ, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
$ man 5 postconf | less +/^smtpd_sender_login_maps
$ man 5 postconf | less +/^reject_sender_login_mismatch
$ man 5 postconf | less +/^reject_authenticated_sender_login_mismatch
$ man 5 postconf | less +/^reject_unauthenticated_sender_login_mismatc
Someone who didn't read my reply:
> So I would assume that you could leave out response codes except for the
> first line for the log output when concatenating a multiple response.
No, because some server will use different reply codes on
different lines of the same reply.
Reindl Harald:
> the pr
Am 08.12.2012 17:14, schrieb Wietse Venema:
> Reindl Harald:
>> the problem is that nearly all clients are only display the LAST
>> respsonse-line which is as example currently a real problem with
>> "smtpd_reject_footer" because the user wil never see anything except
>> the footer, AFAIK the wil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/8/2012 10:35 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> i know, but i am really unsure if i can use the devel-release
> for production, technically the update is done in 5 minutes and
> the same time i am impressed about the way you are not breaking
> backward
Am 08.12.2012 20:01, schrieb Noel Jones:
> On 12/8/2012 10:35 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> i know, but i am really unsure if i can use the devel-release
>> for production, technically the update is done in 5 minutes and
>> the same time i am impressed about the way you are not breaking
>> backwar
Thanks all who replied :)
Regards
Muzaffer
On 7 December 2012 14:08, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 12/7/2012 5:26 AM, Muzaffer Tolga Özses wrote:
> > NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from mail-ea0-f172.google.com[209.85.215.172]:
> > 550 5.1.1 : Recipient address rejected:
> > User unknown in virtual mailbox ta
Each of my systems sends alerts to my mail server for delivery to my email
address through a special user account on my mail server with no shell
account which is only used for this purpose. Can I limit all mail sent by
authenticating through this user account so that it can only be delivered
to m
Having trouble getting postfix configured correctly to relay to Google Apps
some of the time.
I am seeing the following error in /var/log/mail.log
Dec 8 21:15:08 vps postfix/master[3924]: daemon started -- version 2.9.3,
configuration /etc/postfix
Dec 8 21:16:05 vps postfix/smtpd[3930]: warni
On Dec 8, 2012, at 9:33 PM, Cameron Smith wrote:
> Dec 8 21:16:05 vps postfix/smtpd[3930]: warning: hostname vps.abw.co does
> not resolve to address 199.101.51.160
WHOIS says the domain doesn't exist.
That would certainly explain the "unknown"s.
It resolves, although it took a good long while
12 matches
Mail list logo
