Am 04.12.2012 08:54, schrieb Tomas Macek:
> On Tue, 4 Dec 2012, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>
>> Am 04.12.2012 08:20, schrieb Tomas Macek:
>>> On Tue, 4 Dec 2012, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>
Am 04.12.2012 07:58, schrieb Tomas Macek:
>
>> 2) why would you setup a submission service
Hi,
Dec 4 09:57:29 kartagis postfix/pickup[21399]: D576E9988: uid=48
from=
Dec 4 09:57:29 kartagis postfix/cleanup[21291]: D576E9988:
message-id=<20121204075729.d576e9...@mail.bilgisayarciniz.org>
Dec 4 09:57:29 kartagis postfix/qmgr[16547]: D576E9988:
from=, size=650, nrcpt=1 (queue active
Am 04.12.2012 08:54, schrieb Tomas Macek:
> Everyone here says me, that MUAs should send their mails through 587.
> I can't do that without iptables, because all
> the people here have Outlook Expresses setup with port 25 for sending
> emails from default configuration
so stop your whole proje
On Tue, 04 Dec 2012 10:10:05 +0200, Muzaffer Tolga Özses
wrote:
> ...
> append_dot_mydomain = no
> biff = no
> inet_interfaces = all
> recipient_delimiter = +
> relayhost =
You don't need to be re-declaring the postfix default settings again.
Try if the following helps simplifying your main.cf:
On 04/12/12 20:54, Tomas Macek wrote:
> Everyone here says me, that MUAs should send their mails through 587. I
> can't do that without iptables, because all the people here have Outlook
> Expresses setup with port 25 for sending emails from default configuration.
That's the general advice, yes, b
Reindl Harald skrev den 04-12-2012 08:12:
Am 04.12.2012 07:58, schrieb Tomas Macek:
2) why would you setup a submission service that doesn't require
auth
from MUAs?
make it simple to abuse
It's because they never had to. It is a historical problem. Now we
have thousands of customers, that >
Dan Lists:
> > Postfix avoids using using getpwnam() because it is fundamentally
> > broken on lots of systems (reporting "user does not exist" after
> > failure to complete the request).
> >
> > You can force Postfix to use getpwnam() if you know that you
> > will never use *SQL or LDAP etc. datba
On 12/04/2012 12:38 PM, Mark Alan wrote:
(postconf -d;postconf -n)|sort|uniq -d
I was asking about how to remove that queue. Other than that, thanks for
the tips.
Muzaffer
Hi everybody,
I'm running a postfix 2.5.5-1 on a old debian server, managing different
mail domains. I'm migrating now to a different mail provider, one domain
at time (es. example.com).
I removed example.com from "virtual_alias_domains" and/or
"mydestination" in main.cf. And restarted postfix.
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 11:59:01PM +1300, Peter wrote:
> On 04/12/12 20:54, Tomas Macek wrote:
> > Everyone here says me, that MUAs should send their mails through
> > 587. I can't do that without iptables, because all the people
> > here have Outlook Expresses setup with port 25 for sending emai
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 07:46:10AM -0600, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 11:59:01PM +1300, Peter wrote:
> > I would still also set up port 587 on the mail.example.com
> > IP as submission as well and try to encourage your users (at
> > least the ones you can) to use port 587 from now o
d.davo...@mastertraining.it:
> Hi everybody,
> I'm running a postfix 2.5.5-1 on a old debian server, managing different
> mail domains. I'm migrating now to a different mail provider, one domain
> at time (es. example.com).
> I removed example.com from "virtual_alias_domains" and/or
> "mydestina
Hi Wietse,
my machine is no more the final destination. It was but now no more.
Basically i removed the example.com from the config and changed the DNS
to point to different MX records.
That's what is driving me crazy :)
Now it MX records are:
# dig example.com MX +noall +answer
example.com.
Hi,
It was in 2006 That Mouss help me setup our Postfix box and it
worked flawlessly till November 27th 2012, when We had to upgrade the
box to the latest version of webmin for the ability to watch our raid
device, that the problems started. An unruly apt-get started deleting
files and bingo, o
d.davo...@mastertraining.it:
> Hi Wietse,
> my machine is no more the final destination. It was but now no more.
> Basically i removed the example.com from the config and changed the DNS
> to point to different MX records.
Is your Postfix system is getting stale information from DNS?
Postfix may
On 12/4/2012 8:59 AM, wispli...@airnet.ca wrote:
> Hi,
> It was in 2006 That Mouss help me setup our Postfix box and it
> worked flawlessly till November 27th 2012, when We had to upgrade
> the box to the latest version of webmin for the ability to watch our
> raid device, that the problems starte
The anonymized dig output I wrote before was the real one, except the
domain name.
It was run directly from the debian mail server I'm having the problem.
I don't want to waste anybody's time, just asking for some hint on what
and where to check.
Like if there is a way to debug the dns query pos
d.davo...@mastertraining.it:
> The anonymized dig output I wrote before was the real one, except the
> domain name.
> It was run directly from the debian mail server I'm having the problem.
> I don't want to waste anybody's time, just asking for some hint on what
> and where to check.
> Like if t
This is from /var/log/syslog:
Dec 4 15:13:41 mail2 postfix/smtpd[26204]: 4E21EA735A:
client=unknown[192.168.2.203]
Dec 4 15:13:41 mail2 postfix/cleanup[26207]: 4E21EA735A:
message-id=<20121204151341.3478.f-zambe...@mastertraining.it>
Dec 4 15:13:41 mail2 postfix/qmgr[24532]: 4E21EA735A:
fro
* d.davo...@mastertraining.it :
> This is from /var/log/syslog:
>
> Dec 4 15:13:41 mail2 postfix/smtpd[26204]: 4E21EA735A:
> client=unknown[192.168.2.203]
> Dec 4 15:13:41 mail2 postfix/cleanup[26207]: 4E21EA735A:
> message-id=<20121204151341.3478.f-zambe...@mastertraining.it>
> Dec 4 15:13:4
* d.davo...@mastertraining.it :
> Dec 4 15:13:41 mail2 postfix/smtp[26167]: 4E21EA735A:
> to=, relay=none, delay=0.1,
> delays=0.1/0/0/0, dsn=5.4.6, status=bounced (mail for mastervoice.it loops
> back to myself)
What is the result of
% host -t mx mastervoice.it
on that machine?
--
[*] sys4
Ralf Hildebrandt:
> * d.davo...@mastertraining.it :
>
> > Dec 4 15:13:41 mail2 postfix/smtp[26167]: 4E21EA735A:
> > to=, relay=none, delay=0.1,
> > delays=0.1/0/0/0, dsn=5.4.6, status=bounced (mail for mastervoice.it loops
> > back to myself)
>
> What is the result of
> % host -t mx mastervoic
Here the requested output:
mail2:~# host -t mx mastervoice.it
mastervoice.it MX 10 ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM
mastervoice.it MX 20 ALT1.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM
mastervoice.it MX 20 ALT2.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM
mastervoice.it MX 30 ASPMX2.GOOGLEMAIL.COM
masterv
Yes, we have read both before we posted and have researched heavily on
the internet. Hence the way the email sent, we have followed more than
one setup troubleshoot.
We were hoping a fresh pair of eyes would pick up the mistake we have
made.
You have a Good Day now,
Carl A Jeptha
http://www.
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> wimpunk:
>> If you want to check on malicious links, postfix could verify if the
>> link it points to is a file with the correct features.
>
> The .forward file is a "program" that can execute arbitrary shell
> commands and that can write to a
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 5:49 PM, /dev/rob0 wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 09:51:05AM +0100, wimpunk wrote:
>> The reason I searched for this is because I just wanted to make my
>> own management easier. I had a .forward+a file which filtered the
>> mail to a specific folder in my mailbox. Becau
wimpunk:
> Thanks for the feedback but still I don't get the point why it would
> make any difference between using a link or a file as .forward. That
> link could only be written by the sysadmin or me. The only thing you
> have to trust is having users with a little common sense. But you
HARDl
On 12/4/2012 2:05 PM, wispli...@airnet.ca wrote:
> Yes, we have read both before we posted and have researched heavily
> on the internet. Hence the way the email sent, we have followed more
> than one setup troubleshoot.
> We were hoping a fresh pair of eyes would pick up the mistake we
> have made
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 08:48:47PM +0100, Daniele Davolio wrote:
> Here the requested output:
> mail2:~# host -t mx mastervoice.it
> mastervoice.itMX 10 ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM
> mastervoice.itMX 20 ALT1.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM
> mastervoice.itMX 20 ALT2.ASPMX.L.GOOGL
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Muzaffer Tolga Özses wrote:
>
>Dec 4 09:57:29 kartagis postfix/smtp[21296]: D576E9988: to=
><[node:author:mail]@mail.bilgisayarciniz.org>, orig_to=<[node:author:mail]>,
>relay=none, delay=0.01, >delays=0.01/0/0.01/0, dsn=5.4.6, status=bounced (mail
>for mail.bilg
30 matches
Mail list logo
