On 2012-10-26 08:14, Wietse Venema wrote:
Robert JR:
1- Dovecot locks /var/mail/user using FCNTL (since a user is
downloading a large mail) 2- Posttix at the same time tries to FCNTL
/var/mail/user .. but it
Please show concrete evidence that Postfix performs fcntl BEFORE
dotlock, and that i
Robert JR:
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
> On 2012-10-26 08:14, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > Robert JR:
> >
> >> 1- Dovecot locks /var/mail/user using FCNTL (since a user is
> >> downloading a large mail) 2- Posttix at the same time tries to FCNTL
> >> /var/mail/user .. but it
> >
> >
On 10/16/12 8:15 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
Kaleb Hosie:
We host a mail server which runs Postfix and there has been a few
times where one of our clients computers becomes infected with
malware and the password is compromised.
How this has come to my attention is because every once in a while,
I
Hi all,
I have set up some new rules in smtpd_recipient_restrictions (see below)
on my test machine. They don't work exactly as I expected. Is there a
way to log the output of each lookup performed? For example, in my
configuration I see some logging from the SPF policy checker, but I have
no clue
On 26-10-2012 23:06, Freek Dijkstra wrote:
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions = reject_unauth_pipelining,
> reject_non_fqdn_recipient,
> reject_unknown_recipient_domain,
> permit_mynetworks,
> permit_sasl_authenticated,
> reject_unauth_destination,
> warn_if_reject check_sender
For the first try peer debugging
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#debug_peer
For the second you want a header check.
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Freek Dijkstra wrote:
> On 26-10-2012 23:06, Freek Dijkstra wrote:
>
> > smtpd_recipient_restrictions = reject_unauth_pipelining,
> >
On 10/26/2012 4:06 PM, Freek Dijkstra wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have set up some new rules in smtpd_recipient_restrictions (see below)
> on my test machine. They don't work exactly as I expected.
If you describe the the unexpected behavior, maybe someone can explain.
> Is there a
> way to log the
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 11:06:00PM +0200, Freek Dijkstra wrote:
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
> reject_unauth_pipelining,
> reject_non_fqdn_recipient,
> reject_unknown_recipient_domain,
You generally don't need this one except on port 587, usually after
permit_auth_destination. Yo
Hello I am tring to get incoming email relay working using a transport file
first off is this the correct way to get email to go from
some...@gmail.com - using gmail could be anywhere >>>
m...@tryingtogetincomingrelayworking.com on mx2.mail.com - my relay server >>>
me@tryingtogetincomingrelayw
hi ,
I just wondered if anyone can give me any suggestions on how to improve
this situation. I have been getting slammed by a bot net mostly for
accounts that don't actually exist since late morning. Almost all the
messages are being rejected by postfix or greylisting but at the same time
it's res
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 04:09:15PM -0600, RYAN M. vAN GINNEKEN wrote:
> Hello I am tring to get incoming email relay working using a
> transport file first off is this the correct way to get email to go
> from some...@gmail.com - using gmail could be anywhere >>>
> m...@tryingtogetincomingrelayw
Hi Wietse, et all.
Not sure whether this is known already or not,... in any case I think
it's quite critical..
I recently stumbled over several MUAs/tools (e.g. Evolution, getmail)
that have their problems with the mbox format, namely by corruption
stored or imported mail in not quoting From_ li
When I execute postconf -d mynetworks, it returns:
zimbra@zre-ldap002:~$ postconf -d mynetworks
mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8 10.137.242.0/24 [::1]/128 [fc00:10:137:242::]/64
[fe80::%eth0]/64
Which Zimbra uses for mynetworks values throughout our application where
necessary (Amavis, SA, OpenDKIM,
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
> When I execute postconf -d mynetworks, it returns:
>
> zimbra@zre-ldap002:~$ postconf -d mynetworks
> mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8 10.137.242.0/24 [::1]/128 [fc00:10:137:242::]/64
> [fe80::%eth0]/64
I though that as of a few releases Postfix drops the %interface
junk from an I
Christoph Anton Mitterer:
> Hi Wietse, et all.
>
>
> Not sure whether this is known already or not,... in any case I think
> it's quite critical..
Postfix implements traditional UNIX mbox format and locks.
Theoretically it is possible to add a support bazillion variants.
Unfortunatelt, there ar
On 10/26/2012 6:16 PM, John Baker wrote:
> hi ,
>
> I just wondered if anyone can give me any suggestions on how to improve
> this situation. I have been getting slammed by a bot net mostly for
> accounts that don't actually exist since late morning. Almost all the
> messages are being rejected by
--On Friday, October 26, 2012 10:21 PM -0400 Wietse Venema
wrote:
Quanah Gibson-Mount:
When I execute postconf -d mynetworks, it returns:
zimbra@zre-ldap002:~$ postconf -d mynetworks
mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8 10.137.242.0/24 [::1]/128
[fc00:10:137:242::]/64 [fe80::%eth0]/64
I though that a
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 09:49:39PM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> >>When I execute postconf -d mynetworks, it returns:
> >>
> >>zimbra@zre-ldap002:~$ postconf -d mynetworks
> >>mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8 10.137.242.0/24 [::1]/128
> >>[fc00:10:137:242::]/64 [fe80::%eth0]/64
> >
> >I thought tha
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:46:40PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 10/26/2012 6:16 PM, John Baker wrote:
> > I just wondered if anyone can give me any suggestions on how to
> > improve this situation. I have been getting slammed by a bot net
> > mostly for accounts that don't actually exist sinc
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 12:17:43AM -0500, I wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:46:40PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> > On 10/26/2012 6:16 PM, John Baker wrote:
> > > Is there anything I can do to alleviate the load on my ldap
> > > server? It's coming from so many IP's it's not going to do
> > > a
20 matches
Mail list logo
