The Stovebolt Geek:
> --On October 11, 2012 4:38:12 PM -0500 Noel Jones
> wrote:
>
> > On 10/11/2012 4:05 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> >> mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8,IP.Of.Fortimail.Firewall
> >
> > While that may mask the problem, it is almost certainly the wrong
> > solution.
> >
>
> Please explain
On 10/11/2012 11:34 PM, The Stovebolt Geek wrote:
> --On October 11, 2012 4:38:12 PM -0500 Noel Jones
> wrote:
>
>> On 10/11/2012 4:05 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
>>> mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8,IP.Of.Fortimail.Firewall
>>
>> While that may mask the problem, it is almost certainly the wrong
>> solution.
Am 12.10.2012 12:56, schrieb Noel Jones:
> On 10/11/2012 11:34 PM, The Stovebolt Geek wrote:
>> --On October 11, 2012 4:38:12 PM -0500 Noel Jones
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/11/2012 4:05 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8,IP.Of.Fortimail.Firewall
>>>
>>> While that may mask the pro
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 04:05:14PM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8,IP.Of.Fortimail.Firewall
(BTW the /32 is implied, you do not need to specify it.)
This in reply to:
> --On October 11, 2012 1:44:04 PM -0700 BeauSanders
> wrote:
>
> >I am attempting to configure a Postfix
Am 12.10.2012 13:55, schrieb /dev/rob0:
> I don't think open relay is likely to be the result, but again,
> there's no reason why a relayhost should EVER be in $mynetworks
surely it is
* barracuda as MX
* postfix as mail-server
* check_recipient_access proxy:mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql-spamfilter
Am 12.10.2012 13:05, schrieb Reindl Harald:
>
>
> Am 12.10.2012 12:56, schrieb Noel Jones:
>> On 10/11/2012 11:34 PM, The Stovebolt Geek wrote:
>>> --On October 11, 2012 4:38:12 PM -0500 Noel Jones
>>> wrote:
>>>
On 10/11/2012 4:05 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8,IP.O
Hello,
This might be off topic, but I was wondering I am using Postfix 2.9.x
and am wanting to integrate antivirus capabilities. What are the
differences between clamsmtp and clamav-milter? I'm wondering which
one would be better for an antivirus setup?
Thanks.
Dave.
On Friday, October 12, 2012 12:38:28 PM David Mehler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This might be off topic, but I was wondering I am using Postfix 2.9.x
> and am wanting to integrate antivirus capabilities. What are the
> differences between clamsmtp and clamav-milter? I'm wondering which
> one would be bet
On 10/12/2012 11:47 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Friday, October 12, 2012 12:38:28 PM David Mehler wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> This might be off topic, but I was wondering I am using Postfix 2.9.x
>> and am wanting to integrate antivirus capabilities. What are the
>> differences between clamsmtp and
Am 12.10.2012 18:47, schrieb Scott Kitterman:
> On Friday, October 12, 2012 12:38:28 PM David Mehler wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> This might be off topic, but I was wondering I am using Postfix 2.9.x
>> and am wanting to integrate antivirus capabilities. What are the
>> differences between clamsmtp and c
Dear all,
I am trying to resolve some LDAP issues, and I've been asked about
Postfix's connection management behavior. How many concurrent
connections to a given LDAP server will proxymap(8) open? When does
it close a connection, and when does it open a new one? I checked the
man page, but it
--On October 12, 2012 6:49:06 AM -0400 Wietse Venema
wrote:
The Stovebolt Geek:
--On October 11, 2012 4:38:12 PM -0500 Noel Jones
wrote:
> On 10/11/2012 4:05 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote:
>> mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8,IP.Of.Fortimail.Firewall
>
> While that may mask the problem, it is almost certa
Ben Rosengart:
> Dear all,
> I am trying to resolve some LDAP issues, and I've been asked about
> Postfix's connection management behavior. How many concurrent
> connections to a given LDAP server will proxymap(8) open?
One proxymap process should make zero or one LDAP connection per LDAP
confi
First, I would like to thank those of you that have replied to this thread. I
appreciate the feedback so far. I need to apologize for my typo...the email
gateway/firewall is Fortimail as you figured out.
I have implemented the suggestions that you have suggested so far:
1. Changed mynetworks to i
The Stovebolt Geek:
> In the case of the OP, the MX should be configured to only accept mail from
> the firewall when the final recipient is internal.
>
> Is there an alternative way to get the MX to accept mail from the firewall?
The proper way is one of the following:
- If the MX host is fina
BeauSanders:
> Inbound mail is being blocked apparently by our postfix server.
Can you see "connect from" logging in the Postfix logfile?
Can you see the network packets when something tries to connect to
your Postfix machine?
Does your Postfix machine have iptables etc. that block port 25?
Is
beau.sand...@gvltec.edu:
> tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:25 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
What about iptables, do you have a rule that permits port 25 traffic
into the machine?
Now, there may *also* be mistakes in Postfix configuration but those
mistakes don't matter while the machine can't rec
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 03:13:20PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > I am trying to resolve some LDAP issues, and I've been asked about
> > Postfix's connection management behavior. How many concurrent
> > connections to a given LDAP server will proxymap(8) open?
>
> One proxymap process should ma
Viktor Dukhovni:
> So the ADDINT macro should use " %lu" rather than "%lu".
Just to be safe, should not there be a delimiter between
string fields, too? That would be the equivalent of " %s".
Wietse
On Oct 12, 2012, at 19:04, Noel Jones wrote:
> On 10/12/2012 11:47 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> On Friday, October 12, 2012 12:38:28 PM David Mehler wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> This might be off topic, but I was wondering I am using Postfix 2.9.x
>>> and am wanting to integrate antivirus capabilit
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 07:13:43PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > So the ADDINT macro should use " %lu" rather than "%lu".
>
> Just to be safe, should not there be a delimiter between
> string fields, too? That would be the equivalent of " %s".
Those are already NUL delimited. The vstring_memca
21 matches
Mail list logo
