Re: Postfix 2.8.x and archive options

Hi, thanks for answer. I forgot to write our daily email's count - about 4. And as a email system we use cyrus. But I thought if postfix could store emails for archiving, alternate for "always_bcc" ... J.K. Cituji Robert Schetterer : Am 11.10.2012 07:28, schrieb Josef Karliak:

Re: Postfix 2.8.x and archive options

Am 11.10.2012 09:13, schrieb Josef Karliak: > Hi, > thanks for answer. I forgot to write our daily email's count - about > 4. number is not that relevant for basic archive actions, relevant for the archive storage is how much mail must be stored, where and for how long and what is the arc

smtpd_use_tls and smtp_use_tls ?

hello I would like to set up a small auxiliary mail server. I would like it use STARTTLS + SASL AUTH to send and SMTP without STARTTLS to receive emails. Do I have to use smtp_use_tls = yes and smtpd_use_tls = no to be able to configure this ? thank you

Re: smtpd_use_tls and smtp_use_tls ?

On 10/11/2012 10:40 AM, Frank Bonnet wrote: hello I would like to set up a small auxiliary mail server. I would like it use STARTTLS + SASL AUTH to send and SMTP without STARTTLS to receive emails. Do I have to use smtp_use_tls = yes and smtpd_use_tls = no to be able to configure this ?

Re: smtpd_use_tls and smtp_use_tls ?

Am 11.10.2012 10:40, schrieb Frank Bonnet: > hello > > I would like to set up a small auxiliary mail server. > > I would like it use STARTTLS + SASL AUTH to send > and SMTP without STARTTLS to receive emails. > > Do I have to use > > smtp_use_tls = yes > > and > > smtpd_use_tls = no smtp_*

Re: Is postscreen really this good? [how to configure postscreen]

On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:43:47 -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote: > readme files, but some of this stuff is above my pay grade. I get > confused and am not sure what to do. In order to benefit from postscreen you need to change both master.cf and main.cf. Assuming that you are starting with a fresh Postf

Re: Postfix 2.8.x and archive options

Hi, I want all emails. Email could be filtered as a spam (false positive). Co I want to have an option to resend the email - copy it into a spool or so. First option is that I've all emails in the another mailbox (in the cyrus mail system), the email could be forwarded to an original r

Re: smtpd_use_tls and smtp_use_tls ?

On 10/11/2012 10:53 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 11.10.2012 10:40, schrieb Frank Bonnet: hello I would like to set up a small auxiliary mail server. I would like it use STARTTLS + SASL AUTH to send and SMTP without STARTTLS to receive emails. Do I have to use smtp_use_tls = yes and smtpd_u

Re: smtpd_use_tls and smtp_use_tls ?

Am 11.10.2012 11:22, schrieb Frank Bonnet: > On 10/11/2012 10:53 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> Am 11.10.2012 10:40, schrieb Frank Bonnet: >>> hello >>> >>> I would like to set up a small auxiliary mail server. >>> >>> I would like it use STARTTLS + SASL AUTH to send >>> and SMTP without STARTTLS

Re: smtpd_use_tls and smtp_use_tls ?

On 10/11/2012 11:26 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 11.10.2012 11:22, schrieb Frank Bonnet: On 10/11/2012 10:53 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 11.10.2012 10:40, schrieb Frank Bonnet: hello I would like to set up a small auxiliary mail server. I would like it use STARTTLS + SASL AUTH to send and SM

Re: Postfix 2.8.x and archive options

Am 11.10.2012 11:12, schrieb Josef Karliak: > Hi, > I want all emails. > Email could be filtered as a spam (false positive). Co I want to have > an option to resend the email - copy it into a spool or so. First option > is that I've all emails in the another mailbox (in the cyrus mail > syste

Re: Postfix 2.8.x and archive options

On 11/10/2012 12:40, Robert Schetterer wrote: Am 11.10.2012 11:12, schrieb Josef Karliak: Hi, I want all emails. Email could be filtered as a spam (false positive). Co I want to have an option to resend the email - copy it into a spool or so. First option is that I've all emails in the

MX vs A records

Good afternoon list Today, i have started seeing alot of connection time-outs on queued mail. I have noticed miss-typed domain names, which have all been regsitered elsewhere, with NO MX records, but A records. as such, the mails are just sitting in the queues, doing nothing. How would one d

Re: MX vs A records

Am 11.10.2012 13:23, schrieb Tom Kinghorn: > Good afternoon list > > Today, i have started seeing alot of connection time-outs on queued mail. > > I have noticed miss-typed domain names, which have all been regsitered > elsewhere, with NO MX records, but A records. > > as such, the mails are

Re: MX vs A records

* Tom Kinghorn : > Good afternoon list > > Today, i have started seeing alot of connection time-outs on queued mail. > > I have noticed miss-typed domain names, which have all been > regsitered elsewhere, with NO MX records, but A records. > > as such, the mails are just sitting in the queues, d

Re: MX vs A records

On 11/10/2012 13:30, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 11.10.2012 13:23, schrieb Tom Kinghorn: you can not deal with this expect create a error-transport for such domains manually - but be aware if this domain get later working mailservices to remove it! a domain does not need a MX record, that is how it

Re: MX vs A records

Am 11.10.2012 13:32, schrieb Ralf Hildebrandt: > * Tom Kinghorn : >> Good afternoon list >> >> Today, i have started seeing alot of connection time-outs on queued mail. >> >> I have noticed miss-typed domain names, which have all been >> regsitered elsewhere, with NO MX records, but A records. >>

Re: MX vs A records

* Reindl Harald : > but be careful remove the error-transport if the domain > becomes active mail-services! Oh yes! > i do this via mysql and a daily php-script which is > removing error-transport if the domain get a MX record > which is NOT fakemx.net > > currently the table has some thousand

Re: MX vs A records

On 11/10/2012 13:38, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: * Reindl Harald : but be careful remove the error-transport if the domain becomes active mail-services! Oh yes! looking at the domains, they all have a SOA record as ns1.sedoparking.com wish we could ban any domain hosted at sedoparking.

Re: MX vs A records

Am 11.10.2012 14:08, schrieb Tom Kinghorn: > On 11/10/2012 13:38, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: >> * Reindl Harald : >> >>> but be careful remove the error-transport if the domain >>> becomes active mail-services! >> Oh yes! >> > looking at the domains, they all have a SOA record as > > ns1.sedopar

Re: MX vs A records

Am 2012-10-11 13:36, schrieb Reindl Harald: i do this via mysql and a daily php-script which is removing error-transport if the domain get a MX record which is NOT fakemx.net currently the table has some thousand recors from the last 2 years Do you populate the database manually or automatica

Re: MX vs A records

Am 11.10.2012 14:20, schrieb Michael Storz: > Am 2012-10-11 13:36, schrieb Reindl Harald: > >> i do this via mysql and a daily php-script which is >> removing error-transport if the domain get a MX record >> which is NOT fakemx.net >> >> currently the table has some thousand recors from the last 2

Re: MX vs A records

Tom Kinghorn: > looking at the domains, they all have a SOA record as > > ns1.sedoparking.com > > wish we could ban any domain hosted at sedoparking. http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#check_sender_ns_access check_sender_ns_access type:table Search the specified access(5) database f

Re: MX vs A records

On 11/10/2012 12:33, Tom Kinghorn wrote: On 11/10/2012 13:30, Reindl Harald wrote: the side-effect is domains without any mail-address and a a-record are deferred for 5 days until the message bounces Thats exactly as i thought.. one can always hope though...:o) configure the firewall to

Re: MX vs A records

Am 11.10.2012 15:06, schrieb Jacqui Caren: > On 11/10/2012 12:33, Tom Kinghorn wrote: >> On 11/10/2012 13:30, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> the side-effect is domains without any mail-address and a a-record >>> are deferred for 5 days until the message bounces >>> >> Thats exactly as i thought.. >

Re: smtpd_use_tls and smtp_use_tls ?

On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 10:53:09AM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 11.10.2012 10:40, schrieb Frank Bonnet: > > I would like to set up a small auxiliary mail server. > > > > I would like it use STARTTLS + SASL AUTH to send > > and SMTP without STARTTLS to receive emails. > > > > Do I have to use

Re: smtpd_use_tls and smtp_use_tls ?

Frank Bonnet: [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ] > On 10/11/2012 10:40 AM, Frank Bonnet wrote: > > hello > > > > I would like to set up a small auxiliary mail server. > > > > I would like it use STARTTLS + SASL AUTH to send > > and SMTP without STARTTLS to receive emails. > > > > Do

Issues with address not listed for hostname

Hi, Over the last week or so I've noticed many instances of the following message in my mail.log. This warning is triggered everytime the local Nagios daemon performs to check if the smtpd is ok. Oct 7 06:45:38 bender postfix/smtpd[12981]: warning: 2600:3c03::f03c:91ff:fedf:219a: address not lis

Re: Issues with address not listed for hostname

staticsafe: > Hi, > > Over the last week or so I've noticed many instances of the following > message in my mail.log. This warning is triggered everytime the local > Nagios daemon performs to check if the smtpd is ok. > > Oct 7 06:45:38 bender postfix/smtpd[12981]: warning: > 2600:3c03::f03c:91f

Re: smtpd_use_tls and smtp_use_tls ?

On 10/11/2012 04:01 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: Frank Bonnet: [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ] On 10/11/2012 10:40 AM, Frank Bonnet wrote: hello I would like to set up a small auxiliary mail server. I would like it use STARTTLS + SASL AUTH to send and SMTP without STARTTLS to re

Re: Issues with address not listed for hostname

On 10/11/2012 10:08, Wietse Venema wrote: > staticsafe: >> Hi, >> >> Over the last week or so I've noticed many instances of the following >> message in my mail.log. This warning is triggered everytime the local >> Nagios daemon performs to check if the smtpd is ok. >> >> Oct 7 06:45:38 bender pos

On configuring a "dumb" postfix client ...

There's a local mail gateway for all inbound / outbound mail. Internal sendmail clients get configured to listen on loopback only and to send everything to the mail gateway: define(`SMART_HOST', `mailhost$?m.$m$.')dnl define(`MAIL_HUB', `mailhost$?m.$m$.')dnl define(`LOCAL_RELAY', `mail

Re: On configuring a "dumb" postfix client ...

On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 10:19:12AM -0400, Oscar Hodgson wrote: > More Linuxen are showing up with postfix already present; it might > be preferable to "simply" configure postfix to have the same > behavior and avoid the sendmail installation altogether. However, > simply setting /etc/postfix/main

Re: Issues with address not listed for hostname

staticsafe: > On 10/11/2012 10:08, Wietse Venema wrote: > > staticsafe: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Over the last week or so I've noticed many instances of the following > >> message in my mail.log. This warning is triggered everytime the local > >> Nagios daemon performs to check if the smtpd is ok. > >> >

Re: Is postscreen really this good? [how to configure postscreen]

On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 09:57:29AM +0100, Mark Alan wrote: > On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:43:47 -0500, Paul Schmehl > wrote: > > > readme files, but some of this stuff is above my pay grade. I > > get confused and am not sure what to do. > > In order to benefit from postscreen you need to change bo

Re: Issues with address not listed for hostname

On 10/11/2012 10:27, Wietse Venema wrote: > staticsafe: >> On 10/11/2012 10:08, Wietse Venema wrote: >>> staticsafe: Hi, Over the last week or so I've noticed many instances of the following message in my mail.log. This warning is triggered everytime the local Nagios daemon

Re: Issues with address not listed for hostname

staticsafe: > > First check the host.conf, hosts, and resolv.conf files in > > /var/spool/postfix/etc. > > > > If that does not cause the coin to drop, compile and run the attached > > getaddrinfo and getnameinfo programs. Postfix requires that the > > hostname from getnameinfo() will resolve with

Re: Issues with address not listed for hostname

On 10/11/2012 10:42, Wietse Venema wrote: > staticsafe: >>> First check the host.conf, hosts, and resolv.conf files in >>> /var/spool/postfix/etc. >>> >>> If that does not cause the coin to drop, compile and run the attached >>> getaddrinfo and getnameinfo programs. Postfix requires that the >>> ho

Re: Issues with address not listed for hostname

On 10/11/2012 10:42, Wietse Venema wrote: > staticsafe: >>> First check the host.conf, hosts, and resolv.conf files in >>> /var/spool/postfix/etc. >>> >>> If that does not cause the coin to drop, compile and run the attached >>> getaddrinfo and getnameinfo programs. Postfix requires that the >>> ho

Re: Issues with address not listed for hostname

staticsafe: > ./getnameinfo 2600:3c03::f03c:91ff:fedf:219a > Hostname: bender.entropynet.net > Address:2600:3c03::f03c:91ff:fedf:219a > > ./getaddrinfo bender.entropynet.net > Hostname: bender.entropynet.net > Addresses: 2600:3c03::f03c:91ff:fedf:219a 97.107.141.59 I presu

Re: On configuring a "dumb" postfix client ...

On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 10:24:44 -0400, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: While a null-client configuration may not be an appropriate default for an out of the box machine, it is definitely easily supported: http://www.postfix.org/MULTI_INSTANCE_README.html#quick Very helpful, more so than http

Re: On configuring a "dumb" postfix client ...

Oscar Hodgson: > On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 10:24:44 -0400, Viktor Dukhovni > wrote: > > > > While a null-client configuration may not be an appropriate default > > for an out of the box machine, it is definitely easily supported: > > > > http://www.postfix.org/MULTI_INSTANCE_README.html#quick > >

Re: Issues with address not listed for hostname

On 11/10/2012 11:51 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: staticsafe: ./getnameinfo 2600:3c03::f03c:91ff:fedf:219a Hostname: bender.entropynet.net Address:2600:3c03::f03c:91ff:fedf:219a ./getaddrinfo bender.entropynet.net Hostname: bender.entropynet.net Addresses: 2600:3c03::f03c:91

Re: Issues with address not listed for hostname

Am 11.10.2012 19:39, schrieb staticsafe: > That has fixed the issue. Thanks for all the help. I do find it a bit weird > that the Debian postfix maintainer > decided to leave that turned on in the default master.cf that ships with the > squeeze package. make a bugreport! Wietse has blamed him

Re: Issues with address not listed for hostname

On Thursday, October 11, 2012 07:46:22 PM Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 11.10.2012 19:39, schrieb staticsafe: > > That has fixed the issue. Thanks for all the help. I do find it a bit > > weird that the Debian postfix maintainer decided to leave that turned on > > in the default master.cf that ships wi

Re: Issues with address not listed for hostname

Scott Kitterman: > On Thursday, October 11, 2012 07:46:22 PM Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 11.10.2012 19:39, schrieb staticsafe: > > > That has fixed the issue. Thanks for all the help. I do find it a bit > > > weird that the Debian postfix maintainer decided to leave that turned on > > > in the defa

Re: Issues with address not listed for hostname

On Thursday, October 11, 2012 01:58:31 PM Wietse Venema wrote: > Scott Kitterman: > > On Thursday, October 11, 2012 07:46:22 PM Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 11.10.2012 19:39, schrieb staticsafe: > > > > That has fixed the issue. Thanks for all the help. I do find it a bit > > > > weird that the De

Re: Issues with address not listed for hostname

Scott Kitterman: > On Thursday, October 11, 2012 01:58:31 PM Wietse Venema wrote: > > Scott Kitterman: > > > On Thursday, October 11, 2012 07:46:22 PM Reindl Harald wrote: > > > > Am 11.10.2012 19:39, schrieb staticsafe: > > > > > That has fixed the issue. Thanks for all the help. I do find it a bi

Re: Issues with address not listed for hostname

Am 11.10.2012 20:05, schrieb Scott Kitterman: > On Thursday, October 11, 2012 01:58:31 PM Wietse Venema wrote: >> Scott Kitterman: >>> On Thursday, October 11, 2012 07:46:22 PM Reindl Harald wrote: Am 11.10.2012 19:39, schrieb staticsafe: > That has fixed the issue. Thanks for all the help

Postfix and Portimail Issues

I am attempting to configure a Postfix MTA in CentOS 6.3 for our school. The Postfix server has to send and receive email through a Fortimail firewall. Outgoing email is working fine. Email sent locally using the mail command to a local user on the CentOS/Postfix server works fine. However, all ema

Re: Postfix and Portimail Issues

On 10/11/2012 3:44 PM, BeauSanders wrote: > I am attempting to configure a Postfix MTA in CentOS 6.3 for our school. The > Postfix server has to send and receive email through a Fortimail firewall. > Outgoing email is working fine. Email sent locally using the mail command to > a local user on the

Re: Postfix and Portimail Issues

mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8,IP.Of.Fortimail.Firewall --On October 11, 2012 1:44:04 PM -0700 BeauSanders wrote: I am attempting to configure a Postfix MTA in CentOS 6.3 for our school. The Postfix server has to send and receive email through a Fortimail firewall. Outgoing email is working fine.

Re: Postfix and Portimail Issues

On 10/11/2012 4:05 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote: > mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8,IP.Of.Fortimail.Firewall While that may mask the problem, it is almost certainly the wrong solution. -- Noel Jones > > --On October 11, 2012 1:44:04 PM -0700 BeauSanders > wrote: > >> I am attempting to configure a Po

Re: Postfix and Portimail Issues

--On October 11, 2012 4:38:12 PM -0500 Noel Jones wrote: On 10/11/2012 4:05 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote: mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8,IP.Of.Fortimail.Firewall While that may mask the problem, it is almost certainly the wrong solution. Please explain why. I'll grant you I left off the CIDR mask.