On Sun, August 26, 2012 9:21 am, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Voytek:
> Yes, if you really want to. However I haven't used this code since
> it was written many years ago. Let me know if it still works.
Wietse,
thanks.
hmmm, I think maybe it's not the best idea... perhaps I should try a cacti
threshol
On Sun, August 26, 2012 8:35 am, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> is it a 'good idea' to firewall block such when they're from
>
> depends on your business
> i tend to do so at least for some days
Reindl,
so either of the two anvil/IP log lines indicates excess, yes ?
Aug 27 06:00:03 postfix/anvil[4396]
Am 26.08.2012 22:10, schrieb li...@sbt.net.au:
> so either of the two anvil/IP log lines indicates excess, yes ?
>
> Aug 27 06:00:03 postfix/anvil[4396]: statistics: max connection rate
> 15/1800s for (smtp:27.115.112.50) at Aug 27 05:59:14
> Aug 27 06:00:03 postfix/anvil[4396]: statistics: max
Den 2012-08-24 14:17, Wietse Venema skrev:
Shane:
Excellent! Issue solved with the following line in my main.cf
inet_protocols = ipv4
Postfix as distributed from postfix.org adds that by default.
in 2.9.x this is not ipv4 but all
and there is a warnning if ipv4 is in main.cf (to reminds o
Den 2012-08-24 05:57, Hari Hendaryanto skrev:
is there any specific reason why those features not allowed/exist?
# comment line in main.cf
On 8/24/2012 4:23 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 24.08.2012 11:09, schrieb Hari Hendaryanto:
On 8/24/2012 3:30 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 24.08.2012 05:57, schrieb Hari Hendaryanto:
it's not really a problem, just my curiosity. I wonder why Postfix does not
support comments such as "//
commen
On Mon, August 27, 2012 6:27 am, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Aug 27 06:00:03 postfix/anvil[4396]: statistics: max connection rate
>> 15/1800s for (smtp:27.115.112.50) at Aug 27 05:59:14
>> Aug 27 06:00:03 postfix/anvil[4396]: statistics: max connection count 1
>> for (smtp:27.115.112.50) at Aug 27 05:
